Mathematics 9709/23 — October/November 2024
Cambridge AS Level · Pure Mathematics 2 · worked solutions for every part, with the mark scheme
Topics Logarithmic and Exponential Functions · Algebra · Differentiation · Integration · Trigonometry · Numerical Solution of Equations
The variables and satisfy the equation , where and are constants. The graph of against is a straight line.
Approach
Take natural logarithms of both sides of , use the power law of logarithms to bring the exponent down, then rearrange into the form to read off the gradient.
Working
Take natural logarithms of both sides:
Using the power law of logarithms, , and since :
Divide both sides by :
This is in the form , so the gradient is the coefficient of .
Answer
The gradient of the straight line is , as required.
The gradient is 3/(2 ln a)
Walkthrough
The equation is exponential in form. To show that the graph of against is a straight line, we need to express as a linear function of . Taking natural logarithms of both sides is the key step: it converts the exponential equation into a linear one, because logarithms turn exponents into coefficients.
On the left-hand side, simplifies using the power law of logarithms: . This brings the exponent down as a coefficient. On the right-hand side, simplifies to because the natural logarithm and the exponential function are inverse operations.
This gives the linear equation . Dividing through by isolates :
This is in the standard slope-intercept form , where the gradient is the coefficient of , namely .
Key Takeaways
The essential skill is recognising that taking logarithms converts an exponential relationship into a linear one. The power law is the tool that brings exponents down. The inverse relationship simplifies the right-hand side directly. Once in the form , the gradient and intercept can be read off immediately.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to apply the power law: writing without simplifying it to .
- Confusing with — the power law applies to the exponent, not to the logarithm itself.
- Stopping at without isolating — the gradient is the coefficient of only after is the subject.
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme notes "AG – necessary detail needed", meaning the intermediate step must be shown explicitly; simply stating the final gradient without working would not earn the mark.
- The gradient is the coefficient of after is isolated, so the rearrangement to form is essential.
Approach
Compute the gradient of the line through the two given points and equate it to from part (a). Solve for , then substitute one of the points into the linear equation to find .
Working
The gradient of the line through and is:
From part (a), the gradient is also , so:
Solve for :
Therefore:
Now use the equation with the point :
Answer
a = e^(29/19) ≈ 4.6, k = 1.7
Walkthrough
From part (a), we know the gradient of the line is . We are given two points on the line, and , so we can compute the gradient directly from the points:
Equating this to the gradient from part (a) gives an equation in only:
Cross-multiplying and solving:
Exponentiating both sides gives .
With known, we substitute one of the given points into the linear equation to find . Using :
Key Takeaways
This question ties together several ideas: the gradient of a line through two points, the linear form obtained by taking logarithms, and solving for unknown constants by substitution. It shows how the linear form from part (a) connects the geometry of the line (its gradient) to the constants and .
Common Mistakes
- Using the gradient formula incorrectly, e.g. instead of .
- Arithmetic errors when simplifying or when computing .
- Forgetting to substitute the point back into the correct equation — the linear form (or equivalently the original exponential form, as in the mark scheme's alternative method).
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme says "Allow greater accuracy", so both (rounded to 2 significant figures) and (exact) are acceptable.
- Either point can be used to find ; both should give . It is good practice to check with the second point.
- The mark scheme's alternative method works directly with the exponential form: and , leading to the same values of and .
Solve the inequality .
Approach
Because the expression inside the modulus changes sign at , split the inequality into two cases. In each case, remove the modulus sign, solve the resulting linear inequality, and intersect the solution with the case condition.
Working
For , . The inequality becomes
Solve:
This contradicts , so this case gives no solutions.
For , . The inequality becomes
Solve:
Since , the condition is automatically satisfied, so this case gives .
Combining the cases, the only valid solutions come from the second case.
Answer
Equivalently, .
x < 4/5
Walkthrough
The modulus is defined differently depending on whether is non-negative or negative. It changes at , so we split the problem there.
For , the expression inside the modulus is non-negative, so . Substituting this into the inequality gives . Solving this linear inequality gives . However, we are working under the assumption , and no number can be both and . Therefore this case contributes no solutions.
For , the expression inside the modulus is negative, so . The inequality becomes . Solving gives , so . Since , every number with automatically satisfies . Thus this case gives the full solution set.
Combining the two cases, the solution is , which can also be written as .
Key Takeaways
- A modulus inequality must be handled by considering the sign of the expression inside the modulus.
- After solving each case, intersect the solution with the case's domain.
- A case can produce no solutions; this must be stated clearly.
- The final answer can be given as an inequality or interval notation; both are accepted.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to split at and treating as everywhere.
- Solving a case but failing to check whether the result is compatible with the case condition.
- Squaring both sides of the inequality without considering the sign of . This can introduce an incorrect lower bound such as , which is not part of the true solution set.
- Not showing the method; the mark scheme requires an attempt at solving the inequality, not just a final answer.
Things to Be Careful About
- At , the modulus is 0 and the right-hand side is , so is not a solution.
- The boundary comes from the case ; it is less than 7, so the case condition does not remove any part of the solution.
- The solution set is unbounded below: any sufficiently negative makes the right-hand side negative, so the inequality is automatically true.
- The mark scheme allows the interval form as an equivalent answer.
The function is defined by for .
Approach
Differentiate using the chain rule, then substitute and evaluate using exact trigonometric values.
Working
Write as a composite function and apply the chain rule:
Simplify:
Substitute :
So:
Using and :
Answer
4√3
Walkthrough
We are asked to differentiate and evaluate the derivative at . The function is a composite: the outer operation is squaring, applied to , which is itself a composite of with .
The chain rule requires us to differentiate from the outside in. First, differentiate the square: . Keep the inner function unchanged. Next, differentiate : the derivative of is , so this gives . Finally, differentiate , which gives . Multiplying these three factors gives .
Now substitute . Then . We need the exact values and . Squaring the secant gives , so the derivative evaluates to .
Key Takeaways
- The chain rule applies layer by layer to composite functions; here there are two layers inside the square.
- Exact trigonometric values at standard angles such as are needed to give an exact final answer.
- , so .
Common Mistakes
- Dropping the factor of from the innermost derivative, which yields instead of the correct .
- Forgetting to square the secant when computing — , so .
- Mixing up radians and degrees when evaluating the trig functions.
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme allows unsimplified forms, but the exact value is the expected final answer.
- The domain guarantees is valid and that lies in , where and are defined and positive.
Approach
Rewrite the integrand using the Pythagorean identity , integrate term by term, then apply the limits.
Working
Use the identity :
Integrate term by term:
So:
Evaluate at the upper limit :
Evaluate at the lower limit :
Subtract:
Answer
3 - pi/2
Walkthrough
We need to evaluate .
The integrand contains , which has no direct standard integral. The Pythagorean identity rewrites it as . Now every term is integrable: integrates to (because the derivative of is , so we multiply by the reciprocal ), the constant integrates to , and integrates to .
The antiderivative is therefore . We evaluate this at the limits.
At : .
At : .
Subtracting the lower value from the upper value: .
Key Takeaways
- The Pythagorean identity is the standard tool for integrating terms.
- .
- Definite integrals are evaluated by substituting both limits and subtracting, carefully handling signs.
Common Mistakes
- Writing and forgetting the factor — the correct antiderivative is .
- Using the wrong sign for ; it is , not .
- Forgetting that , so the lower-limit substitution contributes , and the subtraction becomes .
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme awards B1 for writing and M1 for the integration step — both must be shown explicitly.
- Leave the answer in exact form ; do not convert to a decimal.
- The limits are in radians; evaluate the trig functions in radian mode.
The polynomial is defined by
where is a constant. It is given that is a factor of .
Approach
Since is a factor of , the factor theorem gives . Substitute into the polynomial and solve for .
Working
Substitute :
Simplify:
Since is a factor, :
Solve:
Answer
a = 4
Walkthrough
The factor theorem says that if is a factor of , then . This is because a factor corresponds to a root . Here . Substitute into :
Set this equal to zero and solve:
This single equation determines the unknown coefficient.
Key Takeaways
- The factor theorem links factors and roots: being a factor means is a root.
- Substituting a known root into a polynomial gives an equation that can determine an unknown coefficient.
Common Mistakes
- Using instead of .
- Sign errors when evaluating and .
- Incorrectly combining .
Things to Be Careful About
- Always write , not .
- Check the final value by substituting back into the polynomial if time allows.
Approach
Use the known factor to divide by . The quotient is a quadratic, which can then be factorised completely.
Working
With , the polynomial is
Divide by using synthetic division:
So the quotient is and the remainder is :
Factorise the quadratic:
Therefore:
Answer
p(x) = (x + 2)(2x - 3)^2
Walkthrough
With , the polynomial becomes . Since is a factor, divide the cubic by . Synthetic division with gives:
The quotient is and the remainder is , so
The quadratic is a perfect square:
Hence the complete factorisation is
Key Takeaways
- Polynomial division reduces a cubic to a quadratic once a linear factor is known.
- Recognising perfect squares helps complete factorisation quickly.
- The complete factorisation must include repeated factors with their powers.
Common Mistakes
- Arithmetic errors in synthetic division, especially signs when multiplying by .
- Forgetting to factorise the quadratic quotient completely.
- Expanding incorrectly.
Things to Be Careful About
- Check the factorisation by expanding: should return the original cubic.
- The remainder must be because is a factor.
Approach
Let . Substitute into the factorised form of . Since , the factor cannot be zero, so only the squared factor can vanish. Then use to solve for in the given interval.
Working
Using the factorisation from part (b),
Since , the first factor is never zero:
So
Using :
Therefore
and
For , the solutions are
Evaluating:
Answer
θ = 54.7° and θ = -54.7°
Walkthrough
We substitute into the factorised polynomial. Since , the factor is always positive and cannot be zero. Therefore the only way the product is zero is
so . Using the reciprocal identity :
Taking square roots gives . On the interval , sine is strictly increasing, so each value occurs exactly once: one positive angle and one negative angle. These are and .
Key Takeaways
- A polynomial equation can be solved after substituting a trigonometric expression by using the factorised form.
- , so factors like never vanish.
- Solving requires considering both positive and negative square roots.
Common Mistakes
- Trying to solve , which has no real solution.
- Forgetting the negative solution when taking the square root.
- Giving angles outside the required interval, such as or .
Things to Be Careful About
- The domain is open, so are not included.
- Since sine is one-to-one on this interval, there are exactly two solutions.
- Use sufficient accuracy: is accepted, and the exact form is also acceptable.
It is given that , where is a constant greater than 1.
Approach
Integrate the given function, apply the limits, set the result equal to 7, then use the logarithm property and exponentiate to solve for .
Working
Since , we have
Apply the limits to :
Use :
Exponentiate both sides:
Multiply through:
Solve for :
Taking cube roots:
as required.
Answer
a = cube root(0.5 e^1.4 (2a + 1) - 0.5)
Walkthrough
The question gives a definite integral equal to 7 and asks you to show that satisfies a particular equation. The first step is to integrate . Because , multiplying by 5 gives exactly , so the antiderivative is .
Next, apply the limits. Substitute the upper limit and the lower limit , and subtract:
This earns the mark for applying limits correctly and equating to 7.
The key step is to combine the two logarithms. The difference of two logarithms with the same base is the logarithm of the quotient:
This is essential because it lets us isolate the fraction . The mark scheme explicitly says this detail is necessary for a 'show that' question.
After dividing by 5, we get . To remove the logarithm, exponentiate both sides. Then multiply through by and rearrange to solve for . Finally, take the cube root to obtain the required form.
Key Takeaways
- The integral of is .
- The logarithm law is used to simplify differences of logarithms.
- To solve an equation of the form , exponentiate both sides to get .
- In a 'show that' question, every algebraic step must be shown.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the factor 5 when integrating . Since the derivative of is , you need to multiply by 5 to obtain .
- Not applying the logarithm property to combine the two logs; the mark scheme requires this detail for the 'show that' proof.
- Making sign errors when subtracting the lower limit: it is , not the other way round.
- Algebraic errors when multiplying by and dividing by 2.
Things to Be Careful About
- Since , both and are positive, so no absolute value signs are needed.
- Keep exact in the working rather than replacing it with a decimal.
- The final answer is given in the question, so the proof must be complete and convincing.
Use an iterative formula, based on the equation in part (a), to find the value of correct to 3 significant figures. Use an initial value of 2 and give the result of each iteration to 5 significant figures.
Approach
Rewrite the result of part (a) as an iteration formula
Starting from , evaluate successive approximations, rounding each to 5 significant figures, until the value is stable to 3 significant figures.
Working
Let
Use .
| (5 sf) | |
|---|---|
| 0 | 2 |
| 1 | 2.1281 |
| 2 | 2.1657 |
| 3 | 2.1765 |
| 4 | 2.1795 |
| 5 | 2.1804 |
| 6 | 2.1807 |
| 7 | 2.1807 |
| 8 | 2.1807 |
| 9 | 2.1808 |
| 10 | 2.1808 |
| 11 | 2.1808 |
The successive values settle to to 5 significant figures, so to 3 significant figures:
(Alternatively, substituting and into gives a sign change, confirming the root lies in .)
Answer
a ≈ 2.18
Walkthrough
The equation from part (a) is already written in the form , so it can be used directly as an iteration formula:
Start with the given initial value . Substitute it into the right-hand side to get , then substitute to get , and so on.
Each value should be recorded to 5 significant figures. This is more precise than the final 3-significant-figure answer and prevents rounding errors from accumulating. The sequence increases towards the root: .
Once successive values agree to 3 significant figures, the iteration has converged. Here the values settle at to 5 significant figures, so to 3 significant figures the answer is . The mark scheme also accepts showing a sign change in the interval as an alternative justification.
Key Takeaways
- A fixed-point iteration formula has the form .
- Starting from a sensible initial value, repeated substitution can produce a sequence converging to the root.
- Rounding intermediate results to more significant figures than the final answer (here 5 sf) avoids premature rounding error.
- To justify a final answer to significant figures, either show enough iterations or demonstrate a sign change in a suitable interval.
Common Mistakes
- Not showing enough iterations; the mark scheme requires sufficient iterations to 5 significant figures or a sign change in .
- Giving the final answer as instead of rounding to exactly 3 significant figures, .
- Rounding each iteration to 3 significant figures too early, which can shift the converged value.
- Using the wrong iteration formula or an incorrect initial value.
Things to Be Careful About
- The iteration must be based on the equation from part (a).
- Record every iteration to 5 significant figures.
- The final answer must be exactly 3 significant figures: .
- If using a sign change, the interval must be and the signs at the two endpoints must be different.
A curve has parametric equations
Approach
This curve is given parametrically, so
Differentiate with respect to using the quotient rule, differentiate with respect to , then divide and simplify.
Working
Differentiate :
Simplify the numerator:
Differentiate :
Therefore,
Simplify:
Answer
dy/dx = (1/2)e^t(e^(2t)+1)^2
Walkthrough
This is a parametric differentiation question. Since both and are given in terms of , the gradient is found using
First differentiate with respect to . This is a quotient, so apply the quotient rule: multiply the denominator by the derivative of the numerator, subtract the numerator times the derivative of the denominator, and divide by the denominator squared. The derivative of is , so the numerator becomes . Factor out ; the bracket simplifies to , giving .
Next differentiate . Since the derivative of is , we get .
Finally divide by . Dividing by a fraction means multiplying by its reciprocal, so
The simplification uses and .
Key Takeaways
The main skill is parametric differentiation: when and are functions of a parameter , use . This question also tests the quotient rule and differentiation of exponential functions such as , whose derivative is .
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to use the quotient rule for and instead differentiating the numerator and denominator separately.
- Making a sign error in the quotient rule numerator.
- Leaving the answer as a fraction within a fraction; the mark scheme requires a simplified form with no fractions inside fractions.
- Cancelling incorrectly when simplifying .
Things to Be Careful About
- Show the quotient rule numerator explicitly to earn the method mark.
- The derivative of is , not .
- When forming , divide by , not by .
- Simplify the final expression fully; an unsimplified equivalent is acceptable for the final accuracy mark, but it must contain no fractions within fractions.
Approach
The curve crosses the -axis where . Solve for , substitute this value into the expression for , and simplify using laws of indices.
Working
Set :
The denominator is never zero, so
Take natural logarithms:
Substitute into :
At ,
Therefore,
Answer
9√2/2
Walkthrough
The curve crosses the -axis at the point where its -coordinate is . Therefore set
Since the denominator is never zero, this is equivalent to , so . Taking natural logarithms gives , hence .
Now substitute this value into the gradient expression from part (a):
Using and , the gradient becomes
Key Takeaways
This part combines solving an exponential equation with evaluating a parametric derivative. To find where a parametric curve crosses an axis, set the relevant coordinate equal to zero and solve for the parameter. Exact answers require using the laws of logarithms and indices rather than decimals.
Common Mistakes
- Setting instead of when finding the crossing with the -axis.
- Forgetting to take the natural logarithm when solving .
- Writing as instead of .
- Substituting a decimal approximation for and losing the exact form required.
Things to Be Careful About
- The denominator is always positive, so there is no risk of division by zero when setting .
- The exact parameter value is , not .
- Use the expression for from part (a); the mark scheme allows substitution into the candidate's own expression.
- Give the final gradient as an exact value, , not as a decimal.
Approach
Expand each and using the compound-angle formula, multiply out, then simplify using and the double-angle formula .
Working
Using :
Multiplying:
Since , we have . Therefore:
Answer
cos(theta+30)cos(theta+60) = sqrt(3)/4 - (1/2)sin(2theta)
Walkthrough
The identity is an answer-given proof, so every step must be shown. Start by expanding each factor using the compound-angle formula . Substitute the exact values , , , . Then multiply the two brackets. There are four products: two give and , and the cross terms give . Use to get . Finally use to replace by , giving the required right-hand side.
Key Takeaways
This question tests compound-angle expansions, exact trigonometric values, the Pythagorean identity, and the double-angle formula for sine. It also shows how a product of two cosines can be rewritten as a combination of a constant and .
Common Mistakes
- Using incorrect exact values for or .
- Dropping the minus sign in the compound-angle expansion.
- Forgetting that the cross terms combine to .
- Stopping at without converting to .
Things to Be Careful About
- Since the answer is given, the mark scheme requires all necessary detail; an unsupported conclusion may lose marks.
- Keep and grouped so the Pythagorean identity is clear.
- Use consistently; do not mix it with prematurely.
Approach
Apply the identity from part (a) with to turn the product into a single sine term. Solve for , then find all angles in the allowed interval and divide by 4.
Working
Let . From part (a):
Substitute into the equation:
Numerically:
Since , we need . The solutions of in this interval are:
Therefore:
No further solutions occur in .
Answer
alpha = 6.9 degrees or alpha = 38.1 degrees
Walkthrough
Use the identity from part (a) with . This converts the product of cosines into . Multiply by 5 and set equal to 1. Rearrange to isolate , obtaining . Because , the angle lies in . Sine is positive in the first and second quadrants, so take the principal value and also . Divide by 4 to get and . No other angles in the interval satisfy the equation.
Key Takeaways
This part combines a proven identity with solving a trigonometric equation. The key skill is to solve for the inner angle first, over its full range, and then divide by 4. It also reinforces that has two solutions in to when .
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to multiply the whole bracket by 5.
- Solving for but forgetting to divide by 4.
- Taking only the principal-value solution and missing the second-quadrant solution.
- Giving solutions for instead of for .
- Not checking that the final values lie in .
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme requires a correct process to obtain at least one value of , so show the inverse-sine step and the division by 4.
- Use degrees throughout; the range is given in degrees.
- The exact form is equivalent to ; either is acceptable.
- There are no additional solutions such as because that exceeds .
Approach
Use the identity from part (a) twice, choosing and so that the two sine terms cancel. Then add the two results.
Working
From part (a):
Put :
Put :
Adding:
Since . Therefore:
Answer
cos20 cos50 + cos40 cos70 = sqrt(3)/2
Walkthrough
The expression is exactly the left-hand side of the identity from part (a) for two different choices of . For the first term, choose because and . For the second term, choose because and . Substituting gives two expressions involving with opposite signs: and . Adding cancels the sine terms, leaving . The key point is .
Key Takeaways
This shows how a single identity can be reused with different substitutions to evaluate a sum of trigonometric products. It also uses the odd symmetry of sine and exact trigonometric values.
Common Mistakes
- Choosing the wrong values of so the angles do not match.
- Forgetting that , which would prevent the cancellation.
- Writing the final answer as instead of .
- Not showing the substitution steps clearly in an answer-given question.
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme awards separate marks for each substitution and for the final addition, so show both substitutions explicitly.
- The answer is given; all necessary detail must be shown.
- and are the same value; either form is acceptable.