Mathematics 9709/21 — October/November 2024
Cambridge AS Level · Pure Mathematics 2 · worked solutions for every part, with the mark scheme
Topics Logarithmic and Exponential Functions · Algebra · Differentiation · Integration · Trigonometry · Numerical Solution of Equations
The variables and satisfy the equation , where and are constants.
The graph of against is a straight line.
Approach
Take natural logarithms of both sides of , use the power law of logarithms, and rearrange into the form to identify the gradient.
Working
Take of both sides:
Using and the power law :
Divide by :
This is a straight line with gradient .
Answer
3/(2 ln a)
Walkthrough
The equation involves an unknown exponent on the left and an exponential on the right. Taking natural logarithms of both sides is the natural first step because logarithms turn exponents into multipliers. This gives . Since , the right-hand side becomes . On the left, the power law of logarithms gives . The equation is now . Dividing by writes it as , which is the equation of a straight line. The coefficient of is therefore the gradient.
Key Takeaways
Logarithms convert exponential equations into linear equations. The power law is essential when the variable appears in an exponent. Once an equation is written in the form , the gradient can be read directly as the coefficient of .
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to apply the power law to and writing incorrectly.
- Not showing the intermediate line . Part (a) is a "show that" question, so the necessary detail must be shown.
- Confusing the gradient with the intercept when reading the rearranged equation.
Things to Be Careful About
- is a constant because is a constant, so dividing by is valid.
- The gradient is the coefficient of , not the constant term .
- The answer must be stated as exactly.
Approach
Use the two given points to find the gradient of the straight line. Equate this to the gradient found in part (a), solve for , then substitute one point into the original equation to find .
Working
The gradient of the line through and is
From part (a), , so
Therefore
so
Substitute into :
Using ,
Since ,
Hence
Answer
a = e^(29/19) ≈ 4.6, k = 1.7
Walkthrough
First compute the gradient of the straight line from the two given points. The gradient is the change in divided by the change in : . From part (a), the gradient is also . Equating these gives an equation involving . Cross-multiply to solve for , then exponentiate to find . Finally, substitute one of the given points into the original equation . Since is now known, the only remaining unknown is . Comparing the exponents gives .
Key Takeaways
A straight-line graph of against can be used to find unknown constants in an exponential relationship. The gradient of the line gives information about the base , and substituting a point gives the remaining constant . This question connects coordinate geometry with logarithms and exponentials.
Common Mistakes
- Reversing the gradient formula and writing .
- Solving for but forgetting to exponentiate to find .
- Substituting the point into the linear form but making a sign error when finding .
- Rounding intermediate values too early; the mark scheme allows greater accuracy, so exact fractions are safer.
Things to Be Careful About
- The gradient is , not .
- Keep exact fractions such as while working to avoid rounding errors.
- When substituting , use and in the correct positions.
- Check that the final values of and satisfy both given points.
Solve the inequality .
Approach
Use the definition of the modulus function to split the inequality into two cases, depending on the sign of . Solve the resulting linear inequality in each case and keep only solutions consistent with the case condition.
Working
Case 1:
Here , so . The inequality becomes
Subtract and subtract :
But this contradicts , so there are no solutions from this case.
Case 2:
Here , so . The inequality becomes
Add and subtract :
This is consistent with , so the solutions from this case are .
Since Case 1 gives no solutions, the complete solution is
Answer
(Equivalently, .)
x < 4/5
Walkthrough
The modulus behaves differently depending on whether is non-negative or negative. So split at .
For , . Substituting this gives the linear inequality . Solving it gives . However, this contradicts the assumption : a number cannot be both at least 7 and less than . Therefore this case contributes no solutions.
For , . This gives , which simplifies to , so . This is compatible with , so every below is a solution.
Because the first case had no solutions, the final answer is just .
Key Takeaways
- To solve a modulus inequality, split by the sign of the expression inside the modulus.
- Always check that the solution found in each case satisfies the case condition.
- A case may produce an algebraic solution that must be discarded because it contradicts the assumed range of .
- The final solution is the union of the valid solutions from all cases.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to intersect the solution of each case with the case condition; this would incorrectly include values such as .
- Squaring both sides without checking signs. Squaring can introduce extra values, and extra checks are needed because can be negative.
- Reversing the inequality sign when subtracting or adding; here no division by a negative number is needed, so the sign should stay the same.
- Not explicitly stating that the first case gives no solutions, losing the 'no other value' mark.
Things to Be Careful About
- The inequality is strict, so is not included.
- The final interval is , not a bounded interval.
- When using the case method, the condition is automatically satisfied by , so no further restriction is needed.
- If using the squaring method, you must verify solutions against the original inequality because squaring is not reversible when the right-hand side may be negative.
The function is defined by for .
Approach
Differentiate using the chain rule, then substitute and evaluate using exact trigonometric values.
Working
Let . Then .
At , we have .
Answer
4√3
Walkthrough
We need to differentiate . This is a composite function: the outer function is squaring, and the inner function is . The chain rule says: differentiate the outer function, keep the inner function unchanged, then multiply by the derivative of the inner function.
Let . Then , so .
The derivative of with respect to is . The appears because of the chain rule applied to the argument .
Multiplying these together:
Now substitute . Then .
From standard exact values: and , so .
Therefore .
Key Takeaways
- The chain rule is essential for differentiating composite functions such as .
- The derivative of is .
- Exact trigonometric values at standard angles must be recalled accurately.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the factor from the chain rule on . The mark scheme's first mark accepts the form , so a wrong constant still earns the method mark but loses the accuracy marks.
- Confusing with — the correct relationship is .
- Evaluating incorrectly, e.g. forgetting to square the reciprocal of .
Things to Be Careful About
- The domain includes , so no domain restriction applies.
- The mark scheme allows using identities before differentiation; an alternative is to rewrite as first, then differentiate.
- Give the exact surd form , not a decimal approximation.
Approach
Rewrite using the identity , integrate term by term, then apply the limits of integration.
Working
Integrate term by term:
Evaluate from to :
At :
At :
Subtract:
Answer
3 - π/2
Walkthrough
We need to evaluate .
The term cannot be integrated directly. However, the Pythagorean identity rewrites it as , which is integrable.
So the integrand becomes .
Now integrate term by term:
- , because the derivative of is , so we need a factor of 2 to compensate.
- .
- .
So the antiderivative is .
Now apply the limits from 0 to .
At the upper limit :
At the lower limit :
Subtract the lower-limit value from the upper-limit value:
Key Takeaways
- The identity is the key to integrating of a linear function of .
- The integral of is .
- Definite integrals are evaluated by substituting the upper limit, substituting the lower limit, and subtracting.
Common Mistakes
- Trying to integrate directly without applying the identity. The mark scheme awards B1 specifically for expressing the integrand as .
- Getting the coefficient wrong when integrating — the correct antiderivative is , not .
- Sign error on : it is , so at the lower limit 0 it contributes , not .
Things to Be Careful About
- When subtracting the lower-limit value, watch for double negatives: .
- Give the exact answer ; the mark scheme also accepts exact equivalents such as .
- The domain ensures is well-defined throughout the interval of integration.
The polynomial is defined by
where is a constant. It is given that is a factor of .
Approach
Since is a factor of , the factor theorem states that . Substitute into the polynomial and solve the resulting linear equation for .
Working
Since is a factor, :
Answer
a = 4
Walkthrough
The factor theorem tells us that if is a factor of , then substituting into must give zero. We substitute into each term of the polynomial, being careful with the signs of the powers of : and . This gives . Setting this equal to zero and solving gives .
Key Takeaways
The factor theorem: is a factor of if and only if . Here the factor corresponds to the root . Substituting the root into the polynomial converts the factor condition into an equation we can solve for the unknown coefficient .
Common Mistakes
- Substituting instead of (confusing the sign of the root).
- Sign errors when computing powers of : , not , and , not .
- Arithmetic errors when combining like terms: , and .
Things to Be Careful About
The factor means the root is , since gives . Always double-check the signs when substituting negative values into polynomials with odd and even powers. The final equation must be solved correctly: .
Approach
With , the polynomial is . Divide by the known factor using polynomial long division, then factorise the resulting quadratic completely.
Working
Divide by . First term of the quotient: .
Subtract:
Next term: .
Subtract:
Next term: .
Subtract:
The quotient is , so:
Factorise the quadratic:
Therefore:
Answer
p(x) = (x + 2)(2x - 3)^2
Walkthrough
We substitute into the polynomial to get . Since is a known factor, we divide the cubic by using polynomial long division. The first term of the quotient is (since ). Multiplying by gives , which we subtract, leaving . The next term is (since ). Multiplying by gives , which we subtract, leaving . The final term is (since ). Multiplying by gives , which subtracts to leave remainder . The quotient is , which factors as since it is a perfect square. The complete factorisation is .
Key Takeaways
Polynomial long division breaks a higher-degree polynomial into a known factor times a lower-degree polynomial. Recognising as a perfect square requires spotting that , , and the middle term .
Common Mistakes
- Arithmetic errors in the subtraction steps of long division, especially with signs.
- Not recognising as a perfect square and leaving the factorisation incomplete.
- Forgetting to include the term at the end of the quotient.
Things to Be Careful About
Check the division by multiplying back: . The quadratic is a perfect square trinomial; the factorisation is the correct complete form. The final answer must have integer coefficients.
Approach
Substitute into the factorised form of . Set each factor to zero and solve. Use the identity to convert to an equation in , then find all angles in the given range.
Working
From part (b), the factorised form is:
Set :
Case 1:
This is impossible since for all .
Case 2:
Using :
For , both the positive and negative angles are in range:
Answer
θ = 54.7° or θ = -54.7°
Walkthrough
We substitute into the factorised form . The product equals zero, so either factor is zero. The first factor gives , which is impossible because and , so . The second factor gives , so . Taking square roots, . In the range , the arcsine of gives approximately , and the negative angle is also in range. No other angles in this interval satisfy the equation.
Key Takeaways
The identity converts a cosecant equation into a sine equation. When solving , remember that , giving both positive and negative angles. The restricted domain is the principal interval for arcsine, so both and are included.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting that has two signs, so missing the negative angle.
- Discarding the negative angle because it falls outside to — but the given range includes negative angles.
- Not checking that has no solution.
Things to Be Careful About
The range includes angles in the fourth quadrant (negative angles). Both and lie in this open interval. No angles beyond are allowed, so there are exactly two solutions. The value , so is an appropriate rounding.
It is given that , where is a constant greater than 1.
Approach
Integrate with respect to , apply the limits and , equate the result to 7, then use logarithm laws to rearrange into the required form for .
Working
Integrate the function:
Apply the limits and and equate to 7:
Combine the logarithms using :
Divide both sides by 5:
Exponentiate both sides:
Multiply both sides by :
Subtract 1 from both sides:
Divide by 2:
Take the cube root of both sides:
Answer
as required.
a = cube_root(0.5e^1.4(2a + 1) - 0.5)
Walkthrough
The problem asks us to show that given that and .
Step 1: Integrate the function. We need the antiderivative of . Recall the standard result . Here , so . Multiplying by the coefficient 10 gives . This earns the M1 and A1 marks.
Step 2: Apply the limits. The definite integral is . We set this equal to 7, which earns the first DM1 mark.
Step 3: Combine the logarithms. Using , we write this as . Dividing by 5: .
Step 4: Exponentiate. Raising both sides as powers of eliminates the logarithm: . This is the key step that earns the second DM1 mark.
Step 5: Rearrange. Multiply both sides by , subtract 1, divide by 2, and take the cube root. This gives the required form and earns the final A1 mark.
Key Takeaways
- The integral of is . This is a fundamental result for P2.
- Logarithm laws such as are essential for simplifying expressions with logarithms.
- To solve an equation involving , exponentiate both sides to remove the logarithm.
- In an "AG" (Answer Given) question, every step must be shown — you cannot skip working.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the factor of when integrating . The integral of is , not .
- Applying the limits in the wrong order — it must be .
- Incorrectly applying logarithm laws, e.g., writing instead of .
- Not showing enough detail for an AG question.
Things to Be Careful About
- Since , both and are positive, so the logarithms are well-defined without absolute value signs.
- The value comes from , which is used in the exponent .
- When exponentiating, apply to both sides of the equation simultaneously.
Use an iterative formula, based on the equation in part (a), to find the value of correct to 3 significant figures. Use an initial value of 2 and give the result of each iteration to 5 significant figures.
Approach
Use the iterative formula starting from , computing each iteration to 5 significant figures until the value stabilises.
Working
The iterative formula from part (a) is:
Starting with :
The sequence has converged to to 5 significant figures.
Answer
a = 2.18 (to 3 significant figures)
Walkthrough
The equation from part (a) gives , which is already in the form — perfect for iteration.
Step 1: Set up the iteration. Write with starting value as specified in the question.
Step 2: Perform iterations. Substitute each value into the formula to get the next. Continue until successive values agree to 5 significant figures. The sequence converges to approximately 2.1807.
Step 3: Round the final answer. The converged value 2.1807, rounded to 3 significant figures, is 2.18.
Key Takeaways
- An equation of the form can be solved iteratively using .
- The sequence converges when successive approximations agree to the required precision.
- Each iteration should be shown to more significant figures than the final answer requires (5 sf for a 3 sf answer).
Common Mistakes
- Rounding intermediate values too early, which can cause the sequence to converge to the wrong value.
- Not showing enough iterations to justify the final answer.
- Giving the answer to the wrong number of significant figures (e.g., 2.181 instead of 2.18).
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme requires either showing sufficient iterations to 5 sf OR showing a sign change in the interval to justify the answer.
- The final answer must be exactly 3 significant figures: 2.18.
- Use the initial value as stated in the question.
A curve has parametric equations
Approach
For parametric equations, use
Differentiate with respect to using the quotient rule, differentiate , then divide and simplify.
Working
Differentiate :
Differentiate using the quotient rule:
Simplify the numerator:
So
Therefore
Answer
dy/dx = 1/2 e^t (e^{2t}+1)^2
Walkthrough
We are given and in terms of a parameter . To find the gradient of the curve, use the parametric formula .
First differentiate . The derivative of is , and the derivative of the constant is , so .
For , use the quotient rule because is a quotient of two functions of . If and , then , and
Substituting gives the numerator shown in the working. Simplify it by factoring out ; the bracket simplifies to , so the numerator becomes .
Finally divide by . This is done by multiplying by the reciprocal of and cancelling the common factor , leaving . The mark scheme requires this simplification to be shown and the final answer to have no fraction within a fraction.
Key Takeaways
- Parametric differentiation: differentiate each coordinate with respect to the parameter, then divide by .
- The quotient rule is needed when the parametric expression for is a quotient.
- Simplifying the numerator before dividing avoids compound fractions.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to use the quotient rule for and differentiating the numerator and denominator separately.
- Writing the quotient rule numerator in the wrong order.
- Failing to simplify ; the mark scheme requires this simplification to be seen.
- Leaving the answer as a fraction inside a fraction, which is not accepted.
- Forgetting the factor when differentiating .
Things to Be Careful About
- The quotient rule numerator is , not .
- Both and equal , so the difference in brackets is .
- When dividing by , multiply by its reciprocal and cancel powers of correctly.
- The final expression must be fully simplified, with no fractions within fractions.
Approach
The curve crosses the -axis when . Set the parametric expression for equal to zero, solve for , then substitute this value into the gradient expression from part (a).
Working
Set :
so
Taking natural logarithms:
Substitute into
At :
Hence
Answer
9√2/2
Walkthrough
The curve crosses the -axis where . Since is given in terms of , set the parametric expression for equal to zero:
A fraction is zero when its numerator is zero, so , giving . Taking natural logarithms gives , so . This is the parameter value at the crossing point.
Now substitute this value into the gradient expression from part (a). Use the exponential-logarithm rules: and . Then
This is the exact gradient at the point where the curve crosses the -axis.
Key Takeaways
- The -axis is the line ; a curve crosses it when its -coordinate is zero.
- To solve , take natural logarithms: .
- , so .
- The parametric derivative is evaluated by substituting the parameter value, not by substituting or .
Common Mistakes
- Confusing the -axis with the -axis and setting instead of .
- Forgetting that a fraction equals zero only when its numerator is zero.
- Using instead of .
- Substituting into or instead of into .
- Giving a decimal instead of the exact surd .
Things to Be Careful About
- From , the correct parameter is , not .
- .
- The mark scheme awards a method mark for substituting the non-zero value of into their gradient expression and attempting simplification.
- Leave the final gradient in exact form unless a decimal is requested.
Approach
Use the compound-angle formulae to expand each cosine product, substitute the exact values of , , and , then simplify using and .
Working
Expand each factor using :
Substitute the exact values:
So the product becomes:
Expand:
Combine the middle terms:
Use and :
Answer
cos(θ + 30°)cos(θ + 60°) ≡ √3/4 - 1/2 sin 2θ
Walkthrough
We need to prove the given identity. Start by writing each cosine of a sum using the compound-angle formula. This turns the product into a product of two binomials. Then replace the trigonometric constants with their exact values. Expanding the binomials gives terms in , and . Use to combine the first and last terms, and use the double-angle formula to replace the remaining product. The result matches the right-hand side.
Key Takeaways
This question tests the compound-angle formula for cosine, exact values of standard angles, and the double-angle formula for sine. It also shows how an identity can be proved by transforming one side into the other using known identities.
Common Mistakes
A common mistake is expanding the product incorrectly or forgetting to distribute the negative signs. Another is using the wrong exact values, especially confusing and . A proof question requires showing the intermediate simplification; simply stating the identity is not enough.
Things to Be Careful About
Remember that , not . Also, when combining terms, must be doubled to obtain . The mark scheme requires the detail of showing the expansion and simplification.
Approach
Use the identity from part (a) with to replace the product of cosines, then solve the resulting equation for . Finally find all values of in the interval and divide by 4.
Working
From part (a):
Put :
Substitute into the equation:
Numerically:
Since , we have . The principal solution is:
The other solution in the range is:
Divide by 4:
Answer
α = 6.9° or 38.1°
Walkthrough
First apply the identity from part (a) by replacing with . This converts the product of cosines into an expression involving . Substitute this into the given equation and solve algebraically for . The value is about . Because is between and , is between and . A sine equation has two solutions in this range: the principal angle and its supplement . Divide both by 4 to obtain the two values of .
Key Takeaways
This question combines an algebraic identity with trigonometric equation solving. It is important to scale the domain correctly when the variable is multiplied by a constant. The general solution for in is and .
Common Mistakes
A common mistake is forgetting to multiply the domain by 4 when solving for . Another is only giving the principal solution and missing the supplementary solution. Also, if the question asks for exact or rounded values, make sure the final answers are given to the required accuracy.
Things to Be Careful About
The mark scheme accepts answers to greater accuracy, so and are acceptable. There are no other solutions between and because the next solutions for would be and , both outside . Ensure the calculator is in degree mode.
Approach
Use the identity from part (a) twice: once with to evaluate , and once with to evaluate . Then add the results, using .
Working
From part (a), for any :
Set :
Since :
Set :
Add the two results:
The sine terms cancel:
Answer
cos 20° cos 50° + cos 40° cos 70° = √3/2
Walkthrough
We need to evaluate the sum of two cosine products. Notice that each product matches the form in part (a) if we choose appropriate values of . For the first product, and both hold when . For the second product, and hold when . Substitute these values into the identity. The terms involving have opposite signs because , so they cancel when the two expressions are added. The remaining gives .
Key Takeaways
This question shows how a proven identity can be applied strategically by choosing substitutions that match the angles in the problem. It also reinforces the odd symmetry of sine, .
Common Mistakes
A common mistake is using for both products, which would give twice instead of the required first product. Another is forgetting that , which prevents the cancellation.
Things to Be Careful About
Make sure the substitutions are consistent: gives and , while gives and . The mark scheme requires clear indication that for full credit.