Mathematics 9709/23 — May/June 2024
Cambridge AS Level · Pure Mathematics 2 · worked solutions for every part, with the mark scheme
Topics Logarithmic and Exponential Functions · Differentiation · Integration · Algebra · Numerical Solution of Equations · Trigonometry
Solve the inequality .
Approach
To solve , we first find the critical values of where the two expressions are equal in magnitude. These values divide the number line into intervals. We then test a value from each interval to determine where the inequality holds.
Working
Solve the equality . This gives two linear equations:
Solving the first:
Solving the second:
The critical points are and . These divide the real line into three intervals: , , and .
Test a point in each interval:
- For , choose : and . Since , the inequality holds.
- For , choose : and . Since is false, the inequality does not hold.
- For , choose : and . Since , the inequality holds.
Therefore, the solution is the union of the two outer intervals.
Answer
x < -10/3 or x > -4/7
Walkthrough
The modulus of a number is its distance from zero, so means the distance of from zero is greater than the distance of from zero. The boundary between "greater" and "less" occurs where the two distances are equal, i.e. . Solving this equality gives the critical points. Since the expressions are linear, the inequality changes behaviour only at these points, so we test one value in each interval.
Alternatively, since both sides are non-negative, we can square both sides: , which simplifies to a quadratic inequality. Expanding gives , so . Factorising gives . The roots are and . Because the quadratic opens upwards, the inequality holds outside the roots, giving the same solution or .
Key Takeaways
- The critical point method for modulus inequalities: solve the equality to find boundaries, then test intervals.
- The squaring method: squaring both sides of a modulus inequality is valid because both sides are non-negative, converting it into a standard quadratic inequality.
- Understanding that the solution to such inequalities is often a union of two disjoint intervals, expressed with "or".
Common Mistakes
- Using "and" instead of "or" when writing the final answer. The mark scheme explicitly states A0 if '... and ...' is used.
- Forgetting to test the intervals after finding the critical points, leading to an incorrect final answer.
- Arithmetic errors when solving the linear equations, especially with the negative sign in .
- When squaring, incorrectly expanding (forgetting the term).
Things to Be Careful About
- The inequality is strict (), so the critical points themselves are not included in the solution set. The final answer must use strict inequalities.
- When testing intervals, choose convenient integer values that clearly fall into each interval.
- Ensure the final answer is written as two separate inequalities joined by "or", not "and".
Use logarithms to solve the equation . Give your answer correct to 4 significant figures.
Approach
Take natural logarithms of both sides so the unknown is brought down from the exponents. Use the power rule for logarithms on the left and the fact that on the right, then solve the resulting linear equation.
Working
Take of both sides:
Using and :
Expand the left-hand side:
Collect the -terms on one side:
Factor out :
Hence:
Evaluating:
Answer
x = 9.256
Walkthrough
We need to solve an equation in which appears in the exponents. Since logarithms are the inverse operation of exponentials, taking natural logarithms of both sides is the natural first step. The bases are different ( and ), so we cannot simply equate the exponents; taking logs allows each exponent to be brought down.
Taking of both sides gives:
On the left, the power rule for logarithms lets us move the exponent in front of . On the right, the product rule gives , and since , this becomes .
Expanding and rearranging turns the equation into a linear equation in :
Factorising and dividing by its coefficient gives the exact expression for . Finally, substituting the values of and and evaluating gives , correct to 4 significant figures.
The mark scheme awards the first two method marks for writing the two logarithmic forms, a dependent method mark for attempting to solve the linear equation, and the final accuracy mark for .
Key Takeaways
- Logarithms convert equations with the unknown in an exponent into linear equations.
- The power rule is essential for bringing exponents down.
- The product rule and the identity are needed to simplify the right-hand side.
- Always give the final answer to the required number of significant figures.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to take the logarithm of the whole right-hand side, so the product is not expanded correctly.
- Writing as instead of .
- Forgetting that , leaving an unnecessary term.
- Making sign errors when moving terms such as or across the equation.
- Rounding intermediate values too early, which can change the final digit.
Things to Be Careful About
- The right-hand side is a product, so use , not .
- Since , the term appears directly without a logarithm.
- Show the linear equation and its rearrangement to earn the dependent method mark.
- The final answer must be given to 4 significant figures: . Greater accuracy such as or is also accepted by the mark scheme.
The diagram shows the curve with equation . The curve crosses the -axis at the point and the -axis at the point . The shaded region is bounded by the curve and the two axes.
Approach
Point A is the y-intercept, so its x-coordinate is 0. Differentiate the curve equation with respect to to obtain the gradient function, then substitute to find the gradient at A.
Working
The equation of the curve is:
Differentiate with respect to :
At point A, :
Answer
-10
Walkthrough
First, identify that point A lies on the y-axis, which means its x-coordinate is 0. To find the gradient at A, we need the derivative . Differentiating gives and differentiating gives using the chain rule. Substituting into the derivative yields .
Key Takeaways
- The derivative of is .
- The gradient at a point on the y-axis is found by evaluating the derivative at .
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the chain rule when differentiating , resulting in instead of .
- Sign errors when differentiating .
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure all terms are differentiated correctly. , not 0.
Approach
To find the x-coordinate of B, set and solve for . To find the area of the shaded region, integrate the curve equation from to the x-coordinate of B.
Working
Finding the x-coordinate of B:
At point B, :
Multiply both sides by :
Take the natural logarithm of both sides:
Since , we have :
This shows that the x-coordinate of B is .
Finding the area of the shaded region:
The area is given by the definite integral:
Integrate:
Evaluate at the upper limit :
Evaluate at the lower limit :
Subtract the lower limit value from the upper limit value:
Answer
5/2
Walkthrough
First, find where the curve crosses the x-axis by setting . This gives . Multiplying by simplifies this to . Taking the natural log gives , so . Next, integrate the function from to . The antiderivative is . Evaluating at requires knowing that and . Evaluating at 0 gives . The difference is .
Key Takeaways
- Exponential equations can be solved by isolating the exponential term and using logarithms.
- Definite integrals with exponential functions require careful evaluation of limits, especially when limits involve logarithms.
Common Mistakes
- Failing to simplify correctly as .
- Sign errors when subtracting the lower limit evaluation from the upper limit evaluation.
- Forgetting the chain rule factor when integrating (must divide by 2).
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure the limits of integration are applied correctly: upper limit minus lower limit.
- Remember that and .
A curve is defined by the parametric equations
for values of such that .
Find the equation of the normal to the curve at the point for which . Give your answer in the form where , and are integers.
Approach
Differentiate and with respect to the parameter , then use
Evaluate at , take the negative reciprocal for the normal gradient, and form the equation of the normal through the corresponding point.
Working
Differentiate :
Differentiate :
At :
Therefore
The gradient of the normal is the negative reciprocal:
The point on the curve when is
So the normal has equation
Multiplying by 2 and rearranging:
Answer
4x - 2y - 9 = 0
Walkthrough
The curve is given in parametric form, so we cannot write directly as a function of . Instead, we differentiate both and with respect to the parameter , then use the chain rule relation
This is the key idea of parametric differentiation.
First differentiate . Using the chain rule, the derivative of is , so
The second form uses the double-angle identity .
Next differentiate . Again by the chain rule,
Now substitute into both derivatives. We have
and
Therefore the gradient of the tangent is
The normal is perpendicular to the tangent, so its gradient is the negative reciprocal:
We also need the coordinates of the point on the curve. Substitute into the original parametric equations:
Using the point-gradient form of a straight line,
Multiplying through by 2 and rearranging gives
Key Takeaways
- Parametric differentiation uses .
- The chain rule is essential for differentiating composite trigonometric functions such as and .
- The gradient of the normal is the negative reciprocal of the gradient of the tangent.
- Always find the point of contact by substituting the parameter value into the original equations.
- Present the final equation in the required form .
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the negative sign when differentiating : .
- Writing as instead of the reciprocal.
- Using the tangent gradient instead of the normal gradient.
- Substituting into the derivative formula but not into the original equations to find the point.
- Leaving the answer as instead of converting to the requested form.
Things to Be Careful About
- The domain means is valid, and all trig values used are standard.
- At , remember and .
- The mark scheme requires a visible attempt to substitute into the derivatives before stating .
- The final equation may be multiplied by a constant and still be correct, but the requested form asks for integer coefficients.
- Be careful with the sign of ; a sign error here changes the gradient and the final normal equation.
The polynomial is defined by .
Approach
Divide by using polynomial long division, matching leading terms until the remainder has degree less than the divisor.
Working
First term:
Multiply and subtract:
Next term:
Subtract:
Next term:
Subtract:
Thus
So the quotient is and the remainder is .
Answer
Quotient: ; remainder: .
Quotient: 3x^2 + 4x - 1; remainder: 6
Walkthrough
We need to divide by . Polynomial long division works like ordinary division: divide the leading term of the dividend by the leading term of the divisor, multiply back, and subtract. Repeating this removes the , then the , then the terms, leaving a constant remainder.
First, . Multiplying gives , and subtracting leaves . Next, . Multiplying and subtracting leaves . Finally, . Multiplying and subtracting leaves . Since has degree less than the divisor , the division stops. The quotient is and the remainder is .
Key Takeaways
This question tests polynomial division by a linear factor and the relationship . It also shows that the remainder is a constant because the divisor is linear.
Common Mistakes
- Stopping too early and not carrying the division down to the constant term.
- Sign errors when subtracting the product of the divisor and the current quotient term.
- Forgetting that the question says the remainder is given as 6, so the working must include enough detail to justify that remainder.
Things to Be Careful About
The divisor is , not , so the leading terms are divided by , not by . The remainder is the final constant left after the degree of the remainder is less than the degree of the divisor.
Approach
Use the quotient and remainder from part (a) to rewrite the integrand as a polynomial plus a fractional term. Then integrate each term separately, using , and evaluate between the limits.
Working
From part (a):
Therefore
Integrate term by term:
At :
At :
Subtract the lower limit from the upper limit:
Answer
14 + ln16
Walkthrough
Part (a) gives . Dividing by therefore gives . This is the key step: it turns a difficult-looking cubic-over-linear integrand into terms we can integrate directly.
Integrate each term: , , , and because the derivative of is .
Then evaluate at and . The upper limit gives ; the lower limit gives . Subtracting gives . Use the logarithm law to combine . Hence the value is .
Key Takeaways
This question combines polynomial division with integration. It also reinforces that and that logarithm laws are needed when evaluating definite integrals with logarithmic terms.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to divide the fractional coefficient correctly: , not .
- Forgetting to subtract the lower-limit value when evaluating the definite integral.
- Incorrectly combining logarithms, e.g. writing as instead of using the quotient law.
- Not using the result from part (a) and trying to integrate the original fraction directly.
Things to Be Careful About
The integral of is , so the factor gives . When substituting , the logarithmic term is , not . Finally, express the answer in the required form with integers and ; here and .
The diagram shows the curve with equation . The curve has a maximum point .
Approach
We differentiate using the quotient rule, with the chain rule supplying the derivative of .
Working
Identify and . By the quotient rule,
By the chain rule, , and . Substituting,
Answer
dy/dx = [(x+3)·(2/(2x+1)) - ln(2x+1)] / (x+3)²
Walkthrough
The function is a quotient of two functions of , so the quotient rule is the natural tool. Letting (the numerator) and (the denominator), the quotient rule states .
The derivative is immediate, but requires the chain rule. Since and has , we have . The factor of 2 is the chain-rule contribution; omitting it would give the wrong answer.
Substituting , , , into the quotient-rule formula gives the required expression. This derivative is the foundation for parts (b), (c) and (d).
Key Takeaways
- The quotient rule is the standard tool for differentiating a fraction of two functions of .
- The chain rule must be applied when differentiating , giving , not just .
- The expression for is needed in part (b) to locate the maximum.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the chain-rule factor of 2 when differentiating , giving instead of .
- Reversing the order in the quotient rule (it is , not ).
- Forgetting to square the denominator.
Things to Be Careful About
- The denominator is non-negative and positive for , so the sign of is determined by the numerator alone — useful in part (b).
Approach
At the maximum point , . We set the numerator of the expression from part (a) equal to zero and rearrange into the required form.
Working
Setting and clearing the positive denominator :
Rearrange:
Multiply both sides by :
Divide both sides by (which is positive for ):
This is the form identified in the mark scheme. Divide both sides by :
Rearrange to isolate :
Answer
x = (x+3)/ln(2x+1) - 0.5
Walkthrough
The maximum point is a turning point, so its gradient is zero. We use the result from part (a) and set the numerator of to zero. (The denominator is positive in the relevant range, so the sign of depends only on the numerator.)
Starting from
we multiply by to give , then divide by to isolate :
This is the form the mark scheme identifies. To reach the required form, divide both sides by to obtain , then rearrange to
Key Takeaways
- A maximum point occurs where the derivative is zero.
- Algebraic manipulation can convert the critical-point equation into an iteration-friendly form .
- The form derived here becomes the iteration formula in part (d).
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to clear the denominator or to divide by the leading coefficient .
- Dividing by when it is non-positive (for the logarithm is positive, so this is safe).
- Sign errors when isolating on the left-hand side.
Things to Be Careful About
- The denominator must be positive for the rearrangement to be valid; this holds for , which includes the region of interest.
- The required form is the iteration formula; keep (not ) on the right.
Approach
Define , which is zero precisely at the -coordinate of . We evaluate at the endpoints of and look for a sign change.
Working
At :
At :
Since and , the continuous function changes sign on . By the intermediate value theorem, has a root in this interval, so the -coordinate of lies between 2.5 and 3.0.
Answer
The -coordinate of lies between 2.5 and 3.0 (sign change from to is confirmed).
Sign change from -0.0696 to 0.4166 confirms the root is in [2.5, 3.0].
Walkthrough
To locate the root of the equation from part (b), we use the sign-change method. Define
This function is zero exactly when , i.e., at the -coordinate of .
Evaluate at the endpoints of the candidate interval :
- . Negative.
- . Positive.
The function is continuous on (since for ). By the intermediate value theorem, because changes sign across the interval, it must have a root in . Hence the -coordinate of lies in this interval.
Alternative view. Let . Then and , so the iteration maps the interval back into itself. By the fixed-point principle, has a fixed point in the interval, which is the desired -coordinate of .
Key Takeaways
- A sign change of a continuous function across an interval implies a root in the interval (intermediate value theorem).
- Working with turns a fixed-point problem into a root-locating problem.
- The interval identified here is the starting range for the iteration in part (d).
Common Mistakes
- Using the wrong sign in : it must be , not , so that .
- Computational slips in evaluating or .
- Stating numerical values without the explicit sign-change conclusion.
Things to Be Careful About
- The function is continuous wherever , i.e., . On this is fine.
- The unrounded values ( and ) are required to support the sign-change argument; the rounded values and are insufficient because the rounding could flip the sign.
Use an iterative formula based on the equation in part (b) to find the -coordinate of correct to 4 significant figures. Give the result of each iteration to 6 significant figures.
Approach
Use the iteration from part (b), starting from (a value in the interval established in part (c)). Iterate to 6 sf until consecutive values agree to the required precision.
Working
With :
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3
The values and both lie in the interval and agree to 6 significant figures, demonstrating convergence. The -coordinate of correct to 4 significant figures is .
Answer
x = 2.569
Walkthrough
The equation from part (b), , defines a fixed-point iteration where . Starting from a value in the interval identified in part (c), we generate successive approximations.
Begin with . Each iteration:
- Compute , then .
- Compute , divide by the logarithm, and subtract .
Iteration 1: .
Iteration 2: .
Iteration 3: .
The values and both lie in and agree to 6 significant figures, so the iteration has converged to the required accuracy. The 4 sf answer is .
(Equivalently, and , both of magnitude less than 1, so the iteration is a contraction on and converges quickly to the unique fixed point.)
Key Takeaways
- The fixed-point iteration converges to the root when started within the interval of convergence.
- Sufficient iterations to higher precision are required to justify a lower-precision final answer.
- A common stopping criterion is to check that consecutive values lie in a narrow interval bracketing the root, or that they agree to the required precision.
Common Mistakes
- Using the wrong iteration formula (e.g., a rearrangement that doesn't match the equation in part (b)).
- Insufficient iterations: only one or two iterations don't justify 4 sf accuracy.
- Premature rounding: each iteration should be carried to 6 sf or more so the final 4 sf answer is correct.
Things to Be Careful About
- The iteration converges quickly here, but at least three iterations are needed to verify the 4 sf answer.
- The sign of stays positive throughout (true for ), so no iteration fails.
- Final answer must be to exactly 4 sf: , not (5 sf) or (3 sf).
Approach
Rewrite using the definition of cosecant, then apply the double-angle identity for sine and simplify to show the result equals .
Working
Start with the left-hand side. Since :
Apply the double-angle identity :
Since , the identity is proved:
Answer
2 sin θ csc 2θ = sec θ
Walkthrough
We need to prove the identity . Since the answer is given, we must show every step of the working.
Step 1 — Rewrite the cosecant. Recall that . This converts the reciprocal function into a fraction involving only sine.
Step 2 — Substitute into the LHS. The left-hand side becomes .
Step 3 — Apply the double-angle identity. The denominator contains , which we expand as . This is the crucial step: it introduces the we need in the final answer.
Step 4 — Cancel common factors. Both numerator and denominator contain the factor , which cancels, leaving .
Step 5 — Recognise secant. By definition , so the expression equals , matching the right-hand side. The identity is proved.
Key Takeaways
- The definitions and .
- The double-angle identity .
- The general strategy for proving trig identities: convert everything to sines and cosines, then simplify.
Common Mistakes
- Writing incorrectly as instead of .
- Misapplying the double-angle formula, e.g. writing without the factor 2.
- Because the answer is given, the mark scheme requires full working — skipping steps loses the marks.
Things to Be Careful About
- The cancellation of is valid wherever the expression is defined (i.e. where and ). As an identity, we work on the common domain.
- Present the working as a chain of equalities from the LHS to the RHS so the proof is clear.
Approach
Use the identity proved in part (a) to replace with . Then apply the Pythagorean identity to obtain a quadratic equation in . Solve for , convert to , and find all solutions in .
Working
From part (a), , so:
Substitute into the equation:
Use :
Multiply through by 2:
Let . Solve using the quadratic formula:
Since :
So or . Taking reciprocals:
For : since cosine is even, .
For : .
All four solutions lie within .
Answer
θ = ±0.952, ±1.76
Walkthrough
We must solve for .
Step 1 — Use part (a). We proved , so dividing by 2 gives . This replaces the compound term with a simple multiple of .
Step 2 — Substitute. The equation becomes .
Step 3 — Unify the trig ratios. We have both and . The Pythagorean identity lets us express everything in terms of alone. Substituting gives .
Step 4 — Form a quadratic. Rearrange and multiply by 2: . This is a standard quadratic in the variable .
Step 5 — Solve the quadratic. Let . Using the quadratic formula, , giving or .
Step 6 — Convert to cosine. Since , we have or .
Step 7 — Find all angles in the interval. For , the principal value is . Because cosine is even, is also a solution. Similarly, gives . All four values lie strictly between and , so all are valid.
Key Takeaways
- Reusing an identity proved in an earlier part to simplify a trigonometric equation.
- The Pythagorean identity for converting between tangent and secant.
- Reducing a trigonometric equation to a quadratic and solving by substitution.
- When solving on , both and must be considered.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the factor of when converting using part (a).
- Using the wrong Pythagorean identity, e.g. writing .
- Only finding the positive solutions and missing and .
- Not showing the quadratic-formula working, which is required for the method marks.
Things to Be Careful About
- The interval is open, ; check that every solution is strictly inside (here , so all four are fine).
- When is negative, is negative, giving solutions in the second and third quadrants — these appear as the pairs with magnitude greater than .
- The mark scheme expects exactly four solutions and no others in the interval.
- Rounding: the mark scheme accepts or greater accuracy.
Approach
Rewrite as and use the double-angle identity to simplify the integrand to a constant multiple of . Then integrate using the standard result for .
Working
Using :
Substitute into the integrand:
Now integrate. Using with :
Answer
4 tan(x/2) + c
Walkthrough
We need to find .
Step 1 — Rewrite the cosecant. .
Step 2 — Use the double-angle identity. The integrand contains , and the denominator will contain . The identity relates these, giving .
Step 3 — Simplify. Substituting, the factors cancel:
The integrand is now a constant multiple of of a linear function of .
Step 4 — Integrate. Using with :
The factor of 2 inside (from ) is essential — it comes from the chain rule in reverse.
Key Takeaways
- Simplifying an integrand with reciprocal trig functions using double-angle identities before integrating.
- The standard integral .
- Recognising that .
Common Mistakes
- Trying to integrate the product directly without simplifying.
- Incorrectly expanding : forgetting the factor 4 in .
- Forgetting the factor when integrating , i.e. writing instead of .
Things to Be Careful About
- The constant of integration should be included (the mark scheme condones its omission, but it is good practice).
- Check the coefficient carefully: the simplification must give exactly , not or another multiple.
- When integrating , the derivative of is , so the antiderivative picks up a factor of 2.

