Mathematics 9709/22 — May/June 2015
Cambridge AS Level · Pure Mathematics 2 · worked solutions for every part, with the mark scheme
Topics Algebra · Trigonometry · Differentiation · Integration · Logarithmic and Exponential Functions · Numerical Solution of Equations
Use logarithms to solve the equation , giving the answer correct to 3 significant figures.
Approach
Take logarithms of both sides so that the unknown index can be brought down using the power law, then solve for and round to 3 significant figures.
Working
Take logarithms of both sides:
Use the power law :
Divide by :
Evaluating with a calculator:
Rounded to 3 significant figures:
Answer
21.6
Walkthrough
The equation has the unknown in the exponent, so ordinary algebraic manipulation cannot isolate it directly. Taking logarithms of both sides is the standard technique because the logarithm of a power allows the exponent to be brought down as a multiplier. We apply the power law to obtain . Dividing both sides by gives . A calculator gives , and rounding to 3 significant figures gives .
Key Takeaways
This question tests the fundamental logarithm–index relationship: if , then . It also tests the power law of logarithms and the ability to round to a specified number of significant figures.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to apply the power law and leaving without bringing down.
- Using different bases in the two logarithms; any base is acceptable, but both logarithms must use the same base.
- Rounding too early and losing accuracy; keep the full calculator value before rounding.
- Giving the answer as instead of when 3 significant figures are requested.
Things to Be Careful About
Make sure both sides are logged, not just the left side. Also remember that in , the exponent multiplies , so the numerator is , not or similar. Finally, 3 significant figures means three digits total, so has three significant figures.
Hence determine the number of integers satisfying
Approach
Use the result from part (i) to rewrite the bounds and in terms of powers of . Since is an increasing function, the inequality becomes bounds on . Then count the integers in that interval.
Working
From part (i), with , so:
and therefore
The inequality is:
Since is strictly increasing, this is equivalent to:
The integers satisfying this are:
The number of integers from to inclusive is:
Answer
43
Walkthrough
Part (i) found the value of such that , namely . This lets us rewrite the upper bound as approximately . For the lower bound, is the reciprocal of , so it equals approximately . The inequality becomes . Since the exponential function is strictly increasing, we can compare exponents directly: . The integers in this open interval are from to inclusive. To count them, use .
Key Takeaways
This part connects an equation result to an inequality. It also reinforces that the exponential function is increasing, so the direction of the inequality is preserved when comparing exponents. Counting integers in an interval requires checking the endpoints carefully.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting that the lower bound is negative and writing only .
- Counting from to and doubling incorrectly, or forgetting to include .
- Using inclusive endpoints and counting or instead of .
- Confusing with ; the negative exponent means reciprocal, not a negative number.
Things to Be Careful About
The inequalities are strict: and . Since is not an integer, the strictness does not exclude the endpoints and , so both are included. The count from to inclusive is , because there are integers.
The rest of this paper
6 more questions- Q2Algebra6M
- Q3Trigonometry6M
- Q4Differentiation · Integration7M
- Q5Algebra · Numerical Solution of Equations8M
- Q6Algebra · Trigonometry · Integration9M
- Q7Differentiation10M