Physics 9702/21 — May/June 2020
Cambridge AS Level · AS Level Structured Questions · worked solutions for every part, with the mark scheme
Topics Electricity · Work, Energy and Power · Physical Quantities and Units · Measurement Techniques · Dynamics · Kinematics · +7 more
Answer all the questions in the spaces provided.
Use an expression for work done, in terms of force, to show that the SI base units of energy are .
Working
Work done:
So
Answer
SI base units of energy are .
kg m^2 s^-2
Background Concept
Energy is measured in joules (J), which is a derived SI unit. A reliable way to find SI base units is to start from a defining equation and replace each quantity by its SI base units.
For work done by a force,
where is work done (energy transferred), is force, and is distance moved in the direction of the force.
Also,
from Newton's second law .
Understanding the Question
You are asked to show that the SI base units of energy are , using an expression for work done in terms of force. That means you must:
- write the work equation,
- replace force with its SI base units,
- multiply by the metre from distance.
Approach
Use . Convert from newtons to base units using , then multiply by (metres) to obtain the base units for .
Step-by-Step Reasoning
Start with
Force:
Units of mass are . Units of acceleration are . So
Distance has units . Therefore
This is the SI base-unit form of the joule.
Key Takeaways
- Use a defining equation (here ) to determine derived units.
- Convert derived units like newtons into base units using fundamental definitions (here ).
- Keep careful track of indices when multiplying units.
Common Mistakes
- Using the wrong work equation (e.g. confusing with ) and getting extra seconds.
- Forgetting that is distance in metres, so missing one factor of .
- Writing (incorrect: that is a joule, not a newton).
Things to Be Careful About
- assumes the force and displacement are along the same line (or you use the component along the displacement). For units, the same base units result.
- Write units in negative-index form (e.g. ) as expected in Cambridge mark schemes.
The energy stored in an electrical component is given by
where is charge and is a constant.
Use this equation and the information in (a) to determine the SI base units of .
SI base units = ______
Working
Given
So
Units: and .
Answer
A^2 s^4 kg^-1 m^-2
Background Concept
When a formula links physical quantities, the equation must be dimensionally consistent. You can find the SI base units of an unknown constant by rearranging the formula and substituting SI base units for all known quantities.
Key base-unit facts used here:
- Energy (joule) has base units .
- Charge is related to current by
So .
Understanding the Question
You are given
and told that is a constant (here it has the same dimensions as capacitance). Using the base units of energy from part (a) and the SI base units of charge, you must determine the SI base units of .
Approach
Rearrange the equation to make the subject. Then replace with and with . The factor of 2 has no units, so it does not affect the unit calculation.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
Start with
Rearrange for :
Now substitute units:
- so .
- .
Therefore
Dividing by is equivalent to multiplying by :
Key Takeaways
- Constants in equations can have units; find them by rearranging and substituting base units.
- Use to express charge in base units ().
- Pure numbers (like 2) do not affect units.
Common Mistakes
- Treating coulomb (C) as a base unit instead of converting to .
- Forgetting to square the charge units: .
- Handling indices incorrectly when dividing by (you must add 2 to the power of ).
Things to Be Careful About
- Write the final answer entirely in SI base units (kg, m, s, A).
- Keep the order and indices clear: is equivalent to .
Measurements of a constant current in a wire are taken using an analogue ammeter.
For these measurements, describe one possible cause of:
-
a random error
-
a systematic error.
Answer
-
Random error: difficulty judging the pointer position on the analogue scale (limited resolution / pointer thickness), so repeated readings vary slightly.
-
Systematic error: zero error of the ammeter (pointer not at zero when no current flows), so all readings are offset by the same amount.
Random: reading uncertainty of pointer position; Systematic: zero error of ammeter.
Background Concept
A measurement error is the difference between a measured value and the true value.
- Random errors cause readings to scatter about a mean value. They affect precision (how close repeated readings are to each other). If you repeat measurements and average, the effect of random error is reduced.
- Systematic errors shift all readings in the same direction (all too large or all too small). They affect accuracy (how close the mean is to the true value). Repeating and averaging does not remove systematic error; you must correct the cause (e.g. re-zero, recalibrate).
For an analogue ammeter, the main issues come from reading the pointer and from the instrument calibration/zero.
Understanding the Question
The current is stated to be constant, and it is measured using an analogue ammeter. You must give:
- one possible cause of a random error in these readings,
- one possible cause of a systematic error.
The question is about the measurement process with an analogue meter, not about fluctuations in the circuit design.
Approach
Pick one credible, specific instrument-related source for each type:
- Random: something that varies unpredictably from reading to reading (e.g. judgement of pointer position).
- Systematic: something that biases every reading the same way (e.g. zero error or miscalibration).
Step-by-Step Reasoning
Random error example (analogue scale reading):
- The pointer has a finite thickness and the scale has finite spacing.
- When you read the scale, you must estimate between divisions.
- Small differences in where your eye is and how you judge the pointer position lead to slightly different values each time.
- Result: readings are spread around a mean value.
Systematic error example (zero error):
- If the ammeter does not read exactly zero when no current flows, then every current reading is shifted by that zero offset.
- For example, if it reads at zero, then every measurement is too high.
- Result: repeated readings are consistent (precise) but all wrong by the same amount.
Other acceptable systematic causes could include a miscalibrated ammeter scale or consistently viewing the scale at an angle (consistent parallax).
Key Takeaways
- Random error: produces scatter; reduced by repeats and averaging.
- Systematic error: produces bias; fixed by correcting the instrument or method.
- Analogue meters commonly produce random reading uncertainty and systematic zero/calibration errors.
Common Mistakes
- Giving a vague answer like “human error” without specifying what physically causes the error.
- Mixing up parallax: if the viewing angle changes each time it can be random; if you always view from the same wrong angle it becomes systematic.
- Saying “random error is due to zero error” (zero error is systematic).
Things to Be Careful About
- The question specifies a constant current, so do not rely solely on “current fluctuates” unless you clearly link it to measurement noise or pointer fluctuations.
- Make sure your systematic error clearly implies all readings shift in the same direction by the same amount.
The rest of this paper
5 more questions- Q2Dynamics · Kinematics · Work, Energy and Power11M
- Q3Forces, Density and Pressure · Deformation of Solids · Work, Energy and Power13M
- Q4Waves · Superposition8M
- Q5Electricity · D.C. Circuits12M
- Q6Electric Fields · Particle Physics10M