Physics 9702/31 — May/June 2019
Cambridge AS Level · Advanced Practical Skills · worked solutions for every part, with the mark scheme
Topics Manipulation, Measurement and Observation · Presentation of Data and Observations · Analysis, Conclusions and Evaluation
In this experiment, you will investigate the forces acting on a metre rule.
(a) • Set up the apparatus as shown in Fig. 1.1.
• The distance between the end of the rule and the loop of string attached to the spring is . Keep this distance constant throughout the experiment.
The distance between the end of the rule and the loop of string supporting the mass hanger is .
The distance between the end of the rule and the loop of string attached to stand B is .
Adjust the apparatus until and .
• The strings and spring should be vertical and the rule should be parallel to the bench.
The length of the coiled section of the spring is . To view this more clearly, you may use the adhesive putty to attach the white card to stand A behind the spring.
Measure and record .
= ______
Measure the length of the coiled section of the spring using a ruler (eye level).
Example reading:
v ≈ 4.80 cm (example)
Background Concept
In Paper 3 practical work, marks for a “measure and record” step are awarded for (i) taking the correct measurement of the stated quantity, and (ii) recording it with sensible precision and a unit.
A spring’s “coiled section length” is a length measurement, so it should be read from a scale with the eye perpendicular to the scale to reduce parallax error.
Understanding the Question
You are told that the apparatus must be adjusted so that the metre rule is parallel to the bench (horizontal) and the spring and strings are vertical. You then measure , the length of the coiled part of the spring.
So the task is simply: set the geometry correctly, then read and record .
Approach
- Ensure the rule is horizontal and the spring is vertical (so is a true vertical length).
- Read from the scale (or against the white card) at eye level.
- Record with an appropriate unit and precision.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- With the rule level and the spring vertical, the coiled section has a well-defined length.
- Place your eye in line with the endpoints of the coiled section (not above or below).
- Read off the length using a ruler/metre rule; record to the nearest mm () if that is the smallest clear scale division.
- Write the value with unit, e.g. .
Key Takeaways
- Practical marks often depend on how you measure and how you record (unit + appropriate precision).
- Keeping the spring vertical reduces systematic error in measuring a vertical length.
Common Mistakes
- Omitting the unit.
- Recording an unrealistic precision (e.g. too many decimal places for a simple ruler reading).
- Measuring the wrong part of the spring (including hooks/uncoiled sections).
Things to Be Careful About
- Parallax: read at eye level.
- Identify the exact endpoints of the “coiled section”.
- Keep the rule horizontal; if the spring is tilted, the measured length is not the true vertical length.
• Change by moving the loop of string supporting the mass hanger to a different position on the rule.
• Move stand B and slide the loop of string attached to stand B along the rule until has the same value as in (a).
• Ensure the strings and spring are vertical and the rule should be parallel to the bench.
• Measure and record and .
= ______
= ______
Move the mass hanger loop to a new position to change . Adjust stand B / the loop position until is the same as in (a). Measure and .
Example set:
x ≈ 45.0 cm, y ≈ 70.5 cm (example)
Background Concept
In this experiment you are changing one position () and then adjusting another position () until the spring length returns to the same value. This “keep constant” instruction is important because it keeps the spring extension (and therefore the spring force) constant.
For practical marks, what matters is that you can:
- change the loop position reliably,
- re-adjust to meet the condition ( same as before),
- measure and record and correctly.
Understanding the Question
You must:
- change by moving the mass hanger loop,
- move stand B and slide the loop on the rule until matches the value from (a),
- then measure and record the new and .
Approach
- Treat as the value you choose (by placing the mass hanger loop).
- Treat as the value you must adjust until the spring returns to the same extension (same ).
- Once balanced (rule horizontal, strings vertical, correct ), read and along the rule.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Move the mass hanger loop to a clearly different mark (large change helps produce a good range of data).
- Slide/move stand B and the loop attached to stand B until the coil length is the same as in (a).
- Check alignment: rule horizontal, strings and spring vertical.
- Read as the distance from the end of the rule (as defined in the stem) to the mass hanger loop.
- Read similarly to the support loop at stand B.
- Record both in to the same precision each time (commonly ).
Key Takeaways
- Achieving the condition (same ) comes before recording and .
- Large spread in values helps later when plotting the graph.
Common Mistakes
- Recording and without re-adjusting to make match the original.
- Letting the rule tilt (not parallel to the bench) while taking readings.
- Reading from the wrong end of the rule (must be the defined “end of the rule”).
Things to Be Careful About
- Re-check after any movement; tightening/loosening strings can shift the spring slightly.
- Avoid parallax when reading and on the rule.
- Keep units consistent (do not mix and ).
• Write down your value of from (a).
= ______
• Repeat (b) until you have six sets of values of and . Record your results in a table.
Record from (a):
Repeat (b) to obtain six pairs of and .
Results table (example):
| 35.0 | 61.6 |
| 40.0 | 66.0 |
| 45.0 | 70.5 |
| 50.0 | 75.0 |
| 55.0 | 79.4 |
| 65.0 | 88.6 |
Six sets of (x, y) recorded in a correctly headed table; v stated (student-dependent).
Background Concept
Good experimental data presentation is assessed by:
- having a single, clear table,
- headings that include quantity and unit (e.g. ),
- a sensible range and number of readings (here six sets),
- consistent precision (same decimal places in a column).
Repeating measurements across a range improves the reliability of the graph and the constants obtained from it.
Understanding the Question
You must:
- write down your measured from (a),
- repeat the method of (b) until you have six pairs of and ,
- record all readings in a table.
Approach
- Keep fixed at the value from (a) every time.
- Choose different values of (spread out over the rule) to give a wide range.
- For each chosen , adjust until matches, then record the corresponding .
- Present and in a two-column table with proper headings.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Write down exactly as measured (with unit).
- Pick a set of values (e.g. around 35 cm to 65 cm) so that points are spread out.
- For each :
- adjust until returns to the original value,
- ensure the rule is level and strings are vertical,
- read and from the metre rule.
- Build one table containing all six readings:
- left column: ,
- right column: ,
- consistent dp (often one dp, i.e. nearest mm).
Key Takeaways
- Six well-spaced readings are more useful than six tightly clustered readings.
- Table headings must include both symbol and unit.
Common Mistakes
- Splitting results into multiple tables.
- Missing units in the headings.
- Inconsistent decimal places (e.g. mixing 45, 45.0, 45.00 in one column).
- Not actually ensuring is the same for every reading.
Things to Be Careful About
- Make sure stays on the rule (do not choose values that force beyond 100 cm).
- Use the same reference end of the rule for all measurements.
- If readings fluctuate, re-check the level of the rule before recording.
Plot a graph of on the -axis against on the -axis.
Plot a graph with:
- vertical axis labelled
- horizontal axis labelled
- a simple scale using at least half the grid in both directions
- all six points plotted accurately.
Graph of y (cm) against x (cm) plotted with suitable scales and points.
Background Concept
Graph marks are awarded for correct scientific presentation:
- correct choice of axes (dependent variable on -axis, independent on -axis),
- clear axis labels with units,
- sensible scales (do not cram data into a corner),
- accurate plotting (small, neat points).
Understanding the Question
You are asked to plot (vertical axis) against (horizontal axis) using your table from (c). This is the starting point for extracting the relationship between and .
Approach
- Put on the horizontal axis and on the vertical axis.
- Choose axis limits that include all your points and spread them over the paper.
- Plot each pair as a small cross or dot with a circle.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Look at your minimum and maximum values of and .
- Choose a scale such as 2 cm on the grid representing 5 cm (or similar) so that:
- the smallest is not too near the origin,
- the largest is not at the very edge,
- similarly for .
- Label axes as and .
- Plot each data point carefully, keeping the plotted marks small and precise.
Key Takeaways
- Correct labels and good use of the graph area are essential for graph marks.
- Accurate plotting matters because the gradient depends on the line position.
Common Mistakes
- Swapping axes (plotting on the -axis).
- Missing units on axes.
- Using awkward scales (e.g. 3 squares = 7 cm) that make plotting inaccurate.
- Plotting thick blobs instead of small points.
Things to Be Careful About
- Do not force the axes to start at zero if your data are far from zero; choose a convenient range.
- Check each point twice against the table to avoid transposing numbers.
- Use a sharp pencil for plotting and line drawing.
Draw the straight line of best fit.
Draw a single straight line of best fit (not point-to-point), with roughly equal scatter of points above and below the line.
Straight line of best fit drawn.
Background Concept
When data follow an approximately linear relationship, the best-fit line is drawn to represent the overall trend. A correct best-fit line:
- is straight,
- is not a join-the-dots polyline,
- balances the scatter (similar number of points above and below).
Understanding the Question
After plotting against , you must draw the best straight line through your points. This line is used in (d)(iii) to find gradient and intercept.
Approach
- Use a ruler.
- Position it so the line passes through the trend of the points.
- Ignore small random scatter; do not force the line through every point.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Visually identify the linear trend.
- Place the ruler so that the distances of points above the line roughly match those below.
- Draw a thin, continuous line across the full range of values used.
Key Takeaways
- Best-fit is about the trend, not connecting points.
- A balanced line gives a more reliable gradient.
Common Mistakes
- Joining points in sequence.
- Drawing a line that goes through the first and last point regardless of scatter.
- Drawing a very short line segment rather than extending across the data range.
Things to Be Careful About
- If one point is clearly anomalous, you may still draw a line that fits the other points (but do not automatically discard points without good reason).
- Use a sharp pencil so the line position is clear for gradient calculations.
Determine the gradient and -intercept of this line.
gradient = ______
-intercept = ______
Working
Use two points on the best-fit line, well separated.
Example (from line): and (units: cm).
-intercept from the line at :
Answer
gradient
-intercept
gradient = 0.900, y-intercept = 30.0 cm (example)
Background Concept
For a straight-line graph of against , the line is described by
where:
- is the gradient (slope):
- is the -intercept (value of when ).
In practical exams you should calculate using two widely separated points on the drawn best-fit line to reduce percentage reading uncertainty.
Understanding the Question
You must obtain two numerical results from your plotted graph:
- the gradient of the best-fit line,
- the -intercept of the same line.
These are then used in part (e) to identify constants and .
Approach
- Choose two points on the best-fit line that are far apart (not necessarily your plotted data points).
- Read off their coordinates accurately.
- Compute .
- Find the -intercept by extending the line to and reading .
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Pick two points on the line with a large horizontal separation (large ) so that small reading errors have less effect.
- Read and from the axes, keeping the same units as your graph (often ).
- Calculate:
- To find the intercept, extend the line back to meet the -axis (where ) and read off .
Note: If your axes are in , then the gradient has unit , i.e. it is dimensionless.
Key Takeaways
- Use the best-fit line, not point-to-point differences.
- Use a large triangle for the gradient.
- Intercept is the value at .
Common Mistakes
- Using two data points that are close together (large percentage uncertainty).
- Calculating instead of .
- Forgetting that intercept must come from the line, not the nearest plotted point.
Things to Be Careful About
- Keep units consistent throughout; if the axes are in then keep and in for the gradient calculation.
- Read coordinates carefully (avoid parallax when reading the graph).
- Extend the best-fit line lightly in pencil to reach the -axis if needed.
It is suggested that the quantities and are related by the equation
where and are constants.
Using your answers in (d)(iii), determine the values of and . Give appropriate units.
= ______
= ______
Given
Comparing with :
Using (d)(iii) (example):
P = gradient (dimensionless), Q = y-intercept (length unit of y).
Background Concept
A straight-line relationship can always be written as
where is the gradient and is the intercept. If the question uses different letters (here and ), you identify them by matching the algebraic form.
Units:
- If and are both lengths measured in the same unit, then has unit which cancels, so is dimensionless.
- has the same unit as .
Understanding the Question
You are told that
and you have already found a gradient and intercept from your graph. You must state and (with units).
Approach
- Recognise that the plotted graph is against , so it matches the straight line form.
- Set equal to the measured gradient.
- Set equal to the measured -intercept.
- Attach appropriate units based on what you used on the axes.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- From (d)(iii) you have a value of gradient .
- Comparing forms term-by-term:
- coefficient of is the gradient, so ,
- constant term is the intercept, so .
- If you plotted and in , then is in .
Key Takeaways
- Matching to is the standard way to interpret gradients/intercepts.
- Units follow directly from the axis units.
Common Mistakes
- Swapping and .
- Giving the unit (it should be dimensionless if both axes are cm).
- Using a value from a single data point instead of the best-fit line values.
Things to Be Careful About
- If you used different units on axes (e.g. in m and in cm), then would carry units; normally you should keep both as the same length unit.
- Quote values to a sensible number of significant figures consistent with graph reading precision.
Theory suggests that
where is the mass of the metre rule and .
Calculate . Give your answer to three significant figures.
= ______
Working
Given
Rearrange:
Using and (example) :
Answer
R = 0.122 kg (example, using P = 0.900)
Background Concept
When theory links an experimental gradient/constant to a physical parameter, you combine:
- your experimental determination of a constant (here from the graph),
- the theoretical relationship (here involving and ),
- algebraic rearrangement to solve for the unknown.
Significant figures: the question explicitly requests three significant figures for .
Understanding the Question
You are given
with . You found from your graph in (e). You must calculate , the mass of the metre rule, to three significant figures.
Approach
- Make the subject of the equation.
- Substitute and your measured .
- Round to three significant figures and include units of .
Step-by-Step Reasoning
Starting with
Multiply both sides by :
Expand brackets:
Rearrange to isolate :
Divide by :
A useful equivalent form is:
Then substitute and your value from the graph. Finally, round to three significant figures.
Key Takeaways
- Practical graphs often provide constants that feed into a theoretical equation.
- Clean algebra (making the correct variable the subject) is essential.
- Always include the unit and the requested significant figures.
Common Mistakes
- Using the intercept instead of the gradient .
- Algebra errors when rearranging (especially with brackets in the denominator).
- Rounding too early and losing accuracy.
Things to Be Careful About
- Use your own experimentally determined from (e), not the example value.
- Ensure is dimensionless (if and used the same length unit), so comes out in .
- Round the final to three significant figures exactly as asked.
The rest of this paper
1 more questions- Q2Manipulation, Measurement and Observation · Analysis, Conclusions and Evaluation · Presentation of Data and Observations20M

