Physics 9702/35 — May/June 2010
Cambridge AS Level · Advanced Practical Skills · worked solutions for every part, with the mark scheme
Topics Manipulation, Measurement and Observation · Presentation of Data and Observations · Analysis, Conclusions and Evaluation
You may not need to use all of the materials provided.
In this experiment, you will investigate the relationship between the power dissipated in a filament lamp and the resistance of the lamp.
Assemble the circuit of Fig. 1.1.
Answer
Circuit assembled as in Fig. 1.1, with the ammeter in series with the lamp and the voltmeter connected in parallel across the lamp.
Circuit assembled as in Fig. 1.1.
Background Concept
In d.c. circuits:
- An ammeter measures current and must be placed in series so the same current flows through it as through the component.
- A voltmeter measures potential difference and must be placed in parallel across the component so it measures the p.d. across that component.
Ammeters have very low resistance (so they do not change the circuit current much). Voltmeters have very high resistance (so they draw negligible current).
Understanding the Question
You are asked to build the circuit shown in Fig. 1.1 so you can measure:
- the current through the filament lamp (ammeter reading), and
- the potential difference across the lamp (voltmeter reading).
These two readings are needed later to calculate power and resistance .
Approach
Follow the diagram exactly:
- Put the supply, switch, and ammeter all in one series loop with the lamp.
- Connect the voltmeter directly across the two terminals of the lamp.
- Check that connections are secure and polarities are sensible (meter reads positive).
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Connect the power supply to the switch.
- From the switch, connect to the ammeter, then to the lamp, and back to the power supply: this makes the lamp current pass through the ammeter.
- Connect the voltmeter across the lamp terminals (one lead to each side of the lamp). This ensures the voltmeter reads the p.d. across the lamp only.
- Before switching on, check for loose leads and correct meter ranges.
Key Takeaways
- Ammeter in series, voltmeter in parallel.
- Correct placement ensures is the lamp current and is the lamp p.d.
Common Mistakes
- Putting the ammeter in parallel (can short-circuit and blow a fuse).
- Putting the voltmeter in series (gives meaningless readings because of its high resistance).
- Measuring across more than just the lamp (e.g. including the ammeter or leads).
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure the voltmeter is across the lamp, not across the whole supply.
- Use appropriate ranges (start high, then reduce for better resolution).
- Switch off/open the switch when changing connections.
Set the power supply voltage to and close the switch so that the lamp lights. Record the voltmeter reading and the ammeter reading .
= ______
= ______
Answer
(Example readings)
Example: V = 12.1 V, I = 0.30 A
Background Concept
To determine how a lamp behaves electrically, you measure:
- Potential difference across it, (volts), using a voltmeter in parallel.
- Current through it, (amperes), using an ammeter in series.
Good experimental practice is to record values to the resolution of the instrument (e.g. 0.1 V, 0.01 A) and to include units.
Understanding the Question
You are told to set the supply to and then record the voltmeter reading and ammeter reading while the lamp is lit.
Note: the voltmeter reading across the lamp may not be exactly if there are internal resistances or other voltage drops, so you must record the meter readings rather than assume .
Approach
- Set the supply to approximately .
- Close the switch and allow the reading to settle.
- Read from the voltmeter and from the ammeter.
- Record each with sensible precision and units.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Adjust the power supply control until its output is near .
- Close the switch; the lamp heats up and may cause readings to change briefly before stabilising.
- Read the voltmeter across the lamp: record to the smallest division/display.
- Read the current on the ammeter: again record to the instrument resolution.
(Your actual values depend on the specific lamp and power supply; the values in the solution are a representative example.)
Key Takeaways
- Always record the measured and , not the nominal supply setting.
- Use correct units and appropriate decimal places.
Common Mistakes
- Writing without reading the voltmeter.
- Omitting units.
- Over-precision (e.g. writing when the meter reads only to ).
Things to Be Careful About
- If using analogue meters, avoid parallax error (eye level with the pointer).
- Ensure the lamp is not overheating; keep readings brief and open the switch between adjustments if needed.
Reduce the power supply voltage, recording and until you have six sets of readings.
Open the switch when you have finished your measurements.
Include in your table of results values of , and , where is the power dissipated in the lamp and is the resistance of the lamp.
Answer
Take six sets of readings of and as the supply voltage is reduced.
Calculate for each set:
Record all values in one table with headings and units (example shown).
| 12.1 | 0.30 | 3.63 | 40.3 | |
| 9.3 | 0.26 | 2.42 | 35.8 | |
| 7.0 | 0.22 | 1.54 | 31.8 | |
| 5.1 | 0.18 | 0.918 | 28.3 | |
| 3.5 | 0.15 | 0.525 | 23.3 | |
| 2.3 | 0.12 | 0.276 | 19.2 |
(Open the switch when finished.)
See working (table of V, I, and calculated P, R, R^4).
Background Concept
The question requires you to investigate how the power dissipated in a filament lamp depends on its resistance.
The key electrical relationships are:
and
So if you measure and for different operating conditions, you can compute:
- (power dissipated in the lamp), and
- (lamp resistance at that operating point).
You are also asked to calculate because plotting against may produce a straight-line graph.
Understanding the Question
You must:
- Reduce the supply voltage in steps and collect six pairs of readings .
- Put all raw and calculated values into a single results table.
- Include calculated columns for , and .
The independent variable you control is effectively the supply setting (which changes and ), and you observe how and change.
Approach
- Choose about six different supply settings spanning a good range (from near maximum brightness down to dim, but still measurable).
- For each setting, wait for readings to stabilise (filament temperature affects ).
- Record and .
- Compute and from the measured values, then compute .
- Present all values with correct headings, units, and sensible significant figures.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
-
Collecting data
- Start at the highest setting (around ) and record and .
- Reduce the supply in steps, recording new and each time, until you have six sets.
- Using a wide range matters because it makes any relationship clearer on a graph and reduces percentage uncertainty in the gradient.
-
Calculating
- Multiply the measured values:
- Units check: .
- Calculating
- Units check: .
- Calculating
- This number becomes large quickly, so it is often best written in standard form (e.g. ).
- Table quality
- One clear table containing all data is expected.
- Column headings should be of the form quantity/unit (e.g. ).
- Use consistent decimal places for a column of measured quantities (e.g. all to 0.1 V if that is your meter resolution).
(The numerical table in the solution is an example format; your values will depend on the lamp and readings obtained.)
Key Takeaways
- Measure and directly, then compute , , and .
- Good tables need headings with units, consistent precision, and a sensible range of data.
Common Mistakes
- Fewer than six sets of readings.
- Missing units in headings, or mixing units within a column.
- Inconsistent precision (e.g. then without justification).
- Calculating using instead of .
- Arithmetic errors when raising to the fourth power.
Things to Be Careful About
- The filament lamp is non-ohmic: changes with temperature, so allow readings to stabilise.
- If becomes very small at low voltage, the percentage uncertainty in becomes large; avoid readings where the ammeter resolution dominates.
- When computing , use enough significant figures in to avoid excessive rounding error, then round sensibly (often 3 s.f.).
Plot a graph of on the -axis against on the -axis.
Answer
Plot (in ) on the -axis against (in ) on the -axis, using an appropriate scale and plotting all six points.
Graph of P (y) against R^4 (x) with correct labels and plotted points.
Background Concept
A graph is used to test whether two variables have a linear relationship. If the suggested relationship is of the form
then plotting (vertical axis) against (horizontal axis) should produce a straight line.
Good graphing practice includes:
- axes labelled with quantity and unit,
- a scale that uses at least half the grid in each direction,
- neat, accurate points (small crosses or dots in circles),
- avoiding awkward scales (e.g. 3 squares = 1 unit).
Understanding the Question
You have calculated and for six readings. You must now transfer these pairs onto a graph with:
- on the -axis,
- on the -axis.
Approach
- Decide sensible axis ranges that include all your data.
- Label axes: and .
- Because may be large, use a scaled axis such as if helpful (but label it clearly).
- Plot all six points accurately.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- From your table, take each value as an -coordinate and the corresponding as a -coordinate.
- Choose a scale so the smallest and largest values are well separated on the page.
- Plot each point carefully; if one point appears anomalous, still plot it (do not omit points unless instructed).
Key Takeaways
- To test , the correct graph is vs .
- Clear labels and sensible scales are essential for marks.
Common Mistakes
- Swapping axes (plotting on and on ).
- Missing units or unclear axis labels.
- Using a compressed scale so points bunch together.
- Plotting instead of .
Things to Be Careful About
- If you rescale the -axis (e.g. dividing by ), remember it affects the numerical value of the gradient unless you account for the factor.
- Points should be precise; avoid large blobs that hide accuracy.
Draw the straight line of best fit.
Answer
Draw a single straight line of best fit through the plotted points (balanced so there are roughly equal numbers of points on either side of the line).
Straight line of best fit drawn.
Background Concept
A best-fit line represents the overall trend in data when scatter is present due to random uncertainties. For a linear relationship, you should draw one straight line that best represents all points, not join-the-dots.
A good best-fit line:
- is a single straight line,
- passes through the middle of the cluster of points,
- has roughly equal scatter of points above and below.
Understanding the Question
After plotting against , you are asked to draw the straight line of best fit. This line will then be used to find the gradient and intercept.
Approach
- Use a ruler.
- Visually judge the overall straight-line trend.
- Do not force the line through every point or through the origin unless the points strongly justify it.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Look for the general trend of the plotted points.
- Place a ruler so the line passes as centrally as possible through the data.
- Adjust so the number (and spread) of points above the line is similar to the number (and spread) below.
- Draw the line as long as practical across the graph area to allow accurate gradient/intercept readings.
Key Takeaways
- Best fit is about the overall trend, not perfect agreement with every point.
- A long, well-placed line improves the accuracy of gradient/intercept.
Common Mistakes
- Joining points with segments.
- Drawing a line that goes through an outlier at the expense of the rest.
- Drawing a very short line (makes gradient less accurate).
Things to Be Careful About
- If one point is clearly anomalous, the best-fit line can still be drawn to fit the remaining trend, but do not automatically exclude points without good reason.
- Keep the line thin and precise; a thick line increases reading uncertainty.
Determine the gradient and -intercept of this line.
gradient = ______
-intercept = ______
Working
Using two well-separated points on the best-fit line (example):
-intercept (at ) .
Answer
gradient
-intercept
gradient ≈ 1.3×10^-6 W Ω^-4, y-intercept ≈ 0.09 W (example)
Background Concept
For a straight-line graph, the general form is
where:
- is the gradient (slope),
- is the -intercept (value of when ).
On a graph of (y-axis) against (x-axis):
- gradient ,
- intercept is the value of when .
Units:
- is in ,
- is in ,
so gradient units are .
Understanding the Question
You must use your best-fit line (not individual data points) to determine:
- the gradient, and
- the y-intercept.
These will be used in the next part to identify constants in the proposed equation.
Approach
- Pick two points on the drawn best-fit line that are far apart (to reduce percentage reading error).
- Read off their coordinates and .
- Compute:
- Read the -intercept by extending the line to and reading there.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Gradient: draw a large triangle on the best-fit line. The vertical side is and the horizontal side is . Then calculate .
- Using points far apart makes and large, so any small reading uncertainty has a smaller percentage effect.
- Intercept: where the best-fit line crosses the -axis (at ) is the y-intercept. If the line does not reach the axis within the graph, extend it with a ruler.
The numerical values depend on the graph you have drawn. The worked numbers in the solution are an example to show method and correct units.
Key Takeaways
- Always use the best-fit line, not point-to-point calculations.
- Gradient is , with correct units.
- The intercept is read at .
Common Mistakes
- Using instead of .
- Choosing two data points instead of two points on the best-fit line.
- Using two points too close together (large percentage uncertainty).
- Forgetting units, especially the unusual .
Things to Be Careful About
- If you scaled the -axis (e.g. plotted ), then the gradient you calculate from the graph must be converted back by the scale factor.
- When reading coordinates, use the correct number of significant figures consistent with graph-reading precision.
It is suggested that the relationship between and is
where and are constants.
Using your answers from (d)(iii), determine the values of and . Give appropriate units.
= ______
= ______
Working
Given
Comparing with for a graph of (y-axis) against (x-axis):
Units:
Answer
a = gradient (W Ω^-4), b = y-intercept (W)
Background Concept
If a relationship can be written in the straight-line form
then plotting against produces a straight line with:
- gradient ,
- intercept .
Here the suggested model is
This is already linear in , so if you plot against :
- corresponds to the gradient,
- corresponds to the -intercept.
Understanding the Question
You have already found the gradient and y-intercept from your graph in part (d)(iii). This part asks you to convert those graphical values into the constants and in the proposed equation, and to state the units.
Approach
- Identify and for the graph: , .
- Compare with .
- Set and .
- Determine units from the axes.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Since the graph is (y-axis) against (x-axis), the straight-line equation is:
- Comparing with the model gives:
- Units:
- is in watts (W).
- is in .
- Therefore
and
- Substitute your measured gradient and intercept values to obtain numerical values of and .
Key Takeaways
- When you plot the variables in the correct linear form, constants come directly from gradient and intercept.
- Units of gradient come from (units of )/(units of ).
Common Mistakes
- Swapping and .
- Giving the wrong unit (e.g. instead of ).
- Using values from two data points rather than the gradient/intercept from the best-fit line.
Things to Be Careful About
- If your -axis was scaled (e.g. ), convert the gradient back to per before quoting .
- Quote and to a sensible number of significant figures consistent with the graph-reading uncertainty.
The rest of this paper
1 more questions- Q2Manipulation, Measurement and Observation · Presentation of Data and Observations · Analysis, Conclusions and Evaluation



