9702/53

Physics 9702/53May/June 2021

Cambridge A-Level · Planning, Analysis and Evaluation · worked solutions for every part, with the mark scheme

2
questions
30
marks
75
minutes

Topics Analysis, Conclusions and Evaluation · Planning

Q115MPlanningAnalysis, Conclusions and EvaluationFree sample

A student investigates the current in a coil and a resistor connected in series, as shown in Fig. 1.1.

The student connects a high-voltage d.c. power supply and a switch across the series combination.

When the switch is closed, it takes time tt for the current in the resistor of resistance RR to reach a maximum value. The time tt is a few milliseconds.

There are a number of different unmarked resistors available.

It is suggested that the relationship between tt and RR is

t=KN2ALRt = \frac{KN^2A}{LR}

where NN is the number of turns of wire on the coil, AA is the cross-sectional area of the coil, LL is the length of the coil and KK is a constant.

Design a laboratory experiment to test the relationship between tt and RR.
Explain how your results could be used to determine a value for KK.

You should draw a diagram, on page 3, showing the arrangement of your equipment. In your account you should pay particular attention to:

● the procedure to be followed
● the measurements to be taken
● the control of variables
● the analysis of the data
● any safety precautions to be taken.

DifficultyMedium-Hard
Worked solution

Answer

Variables

  • Independent variable: RR (use different unmarked resistors; measure each RR with a digital multimeter).
  • Dependent variable: time tt for the current to reach its maximum steady value after the switch is closed.
  • Controlled variables: same coil (fixed NN, AA, LL), same power-supply setting (constant VV), same shunt resistor, same switching method, keep coil temperature approximately constant.

Apparatus / arrangement

  • High-voltage d.c. supply, switch.
  • Coil (test inductor).
  • Set of resistors.
  • Small shunt resistor rsr_s (low value, known) in series to measure current.
  • Digital oscilloscope (or data logger) to record VsV_s across rsr_s.

Procedure and measurements

  1. Connect the series circuit: supply–switch–coil–test resistor RR–shunt rsr_s.
  2. Connect the oscilloscope across rsr_s so VsV_s is measured; then I=Vs/rsI = V_s / r_s.
  3. Set oscilloscope to single-shot, triggering at switch closure; choose a time-base of a few ms.
  4. Close the switch briefly to apply a step d.c. voltage. Record the trace of Vs(t)V_s(t) and hence I(t)I(t).
  5. Determine ImaxI_{\max} from the plateau value. Measure tt from the switching instant to when the trace has reached the maximum steady value (e.g. when II first becomes constant within the oscilloscope resolution, or equivalently when II reaches a stated fraction such as 0.99Imax0.99I_{\max}, used consistently for all runs).
  6. Repeat at least 3 times for the same RR and take the mean tt. Repeat for at least 6 different values of RR.

Control of variables

  • Use the same coil throughout (so NN, AA, LL constant).
  • Keep VV constant by not changing the supply setting.
  • Keep coil resistance/temperature approximately constant: keep switch closed only briefly, allow cooling time between runs, and keep current limited (choose RR values so RR \gg coil resistance).
  • Keep rsr_s constant and small so it does not significantly change the chosen RR (or include it as a constant offset in all runs).

Analysis of data and determining KK

Given

t=KN2ALR t = \frac{KN^2A}{LR}

Rearrange to linear form:

t=(KN2AL)(1R) t = \left(\frac{KN^2A}{L}\right)\left(\frac{1}{R}\right)
  • Make a table of RR, 1/R1/R, and mean tt (with uncertainties).
  • Plot a graph of tt (y-axis) against 1/R1/R (x-axis).
  • A straight line through the origin supports the suggested relationship.
  • Gradient m=KN2ALm = \dfrac{KN^2A}{L}, so
K=mLN2A. K = \frac{mL}{N^2A}.

(Measure LL and AA of the coil; A=πr2A = \pi r^2 using calipers for radius rr; NN from coil specification or by counting.)

Uncertainties

  • Uncertainty in tt: from oscilloscope time-base resolution and repeat scatter; use repeats and take half-range/standard deviation.
  • Uncertainty in RR: from multimeter resolution.
  • Add error bars to the graph; uncertainty in gradient from worst acceptable line; propagate to KK.

Safety

  • High voltage: use insulated leads, do not touch exposed conductors, switch off before changing resistors.
  • Limit current (use sufficiently large RR and check resistor power rating to avoid overheating).
  • Avoid heating the coil by keeping the switch closed only briefly.
Final answer

See working

Detailed explanation

Background Concept

When a d.c. supply is suddenly connected to a series combination of a coil (inductor) and a resistor, the current does not jump instantly to its final value. The inductor produces an induced emf that opposes changes in current, so the current rises over a short time.

In a simple series RLRL circuit, the rise of current after a step in voltage is governed by an exponential approach to a steady value, with a characteristic timescale called the time constant. In general, the larger the resistance, the faster the current reaches its steady value.

The question suggests a specific relationship:

t=KN2ALR t = \frac{KN^2A}{LR}

Here NN, AA, and LL are properties of the coil, and KK is a constant. If the coil is unchanged, then NN, AA, and LL are constant, so the equation predicts that t1/Rt \propto 1/R.

Understanding the Question

You are asked to design an experiment (Paper 5 planning style) to test whether tt depends on RR in the way suggested, when a switch connects a high-voltage d.c. supply to a series coil + resistor.

So you must:

  • vary RR (independent variable),
  • measure the time tt for the current to reach its maximum/steady value (dependent variable),
  • keep coil geometry (NN, AA, LL) and other conditions constant,
  • decide how to measure a current that changes over a few milliseconds,
  • analyse results using a graph to check the relationship and extract KK.

Because the change occurs in a few ms, a meter is too slow; an oscilloscope or data logger is appropriate.

Approach

  1. Measure current indirectly: place a small known shunt resistor in series and measure the voltage across it; since V=IrV = Ir, the measured voltage is proportional to current.
  2. Use single-shot recording: trigger the oscilloscope at switch closure to capture the transient.
  3. Repeat for multiple RR values and average tt to reduce random error.
  4. Linearise the given relationship: since t1/Rt \propto 1/R, plot tt against 1/R1/R.
  5. Use gradient to find KK because the gradient contains KK multiplied/divided by known coil parameters.

Step-by-Step Reasoning

1) Choosing variables

  • You can control RR easily by swapping resistors.
  • The coil parameters NN, AA, LL must remain fixed: therefore use the same coil for all runs.
  • The time tt is what you are trying to see change, so it is the dependent variable.

2) Capturing a millisecond transient

A standard ammeter typically cannot resolve the current change over a few milliseconds. Instead:

  • Put a small resistor rsr_s in series.
  • Measure Vs(t)V_s(t) across rsr_s with an oscilloscope.
  • Convert to current using:
I(t)=Vs(t)rs. I(t) = \frac{V_s(t)}{r_s}.

This method has two big advantages:

  • the oscilloscope has ms (or better) time resolution,
  • measuring a voltage is easy and fast.

3) Defining and measuring tt

The question states “time for the current in the resistor to reach a maximum value”. In reality, the current approaches a steady value; it does not usually become perfectly constant instantly.

So you must adopt an operational definition of “reaches maximum” and keep it consistent, for example:

  • measure the time from switch closure to the point where the trace first becomes flat within the oscilloscope resolution, or
  • measure time to reach a stated fraction (e.g. 0.99Imax0.99I_{\max}).

Either is acceptable in a plan as long as you state what you will do and apply it consistently.

4) Controlling variables (what could accidentally change)

  • Supply voltage: keep the power supply setting fixed.
  • Coil temperature: repeated large currents can heat the coil and change its resistance and inductive behaviour. Minimise by using short switching times and cooling intervals, and/or choose RR values that limit current.
  • Extra resistances (leads, shunt, coil resistance): keep the same shunt and wiring each time. If necessary, choose RR values much larger than coil resistance so the tested RR dominates.

5) Analysis to test the relationship

Start with the given model:

t=KN2ALR t = \frac{KN^2A}{LR}

Treat N2A/LN^2A/L as constant (because the coil is unchanged). Then:

t=(KN2AL)(1R) t = \left(\frac{KN^2A}{L}\right)\left(\frac{1}{R}\right)

This is of the form y=mxy = mx with y=ty=t and x=1/Rx=1/R.

So:

  • make a table of RR, 1/R1/R, and measured mean tt,
  • plot tt vs 1/R1/R,
  • check for a straight line passing through (0,0) within uncertainties.

6) Finding KK from the gradient

If the graph is straight, its gradient mm is:

m=KN2AL. m = \frac{KN^2A}{L}.

So:

K=mLN2A. K = \frac{mL}{N^2A}.

You then need values for NN, AA and LL:

  • LL measured with a ruler (coil length),
  • AA from A=πr2A=\pi r^2 using radius rr measured with calipers,
  • NN from specification or counting turns.

7) Uncertainties (what you would write to gain evaluation marks)

  • Repeat traces for each RR to estimate random uncertainty in tt.
  • Read tt using oscilloscope cursors; uncertainty is related to time-base resolution and how clearly the plateau is defined.
  • Measure RR with a multimeter; record its uncertainty from meter resolution.
  • Use error bars on tt (and possibly on 1/R1/R), draw a best-fit line and a worst acceptable line to estimate uncertainty in gradient, then propagate to KK.

8) Safety

High-voltage d.c. supplies can be dangerous. Sensible precautions:

  • power off before changing resistors or wiring,
  • use insulated leads and a properly rated switch,
  • limit current to prevent overheating of resistors/coil (check power ratings),
  • keep switch closed only briefly to avoid excessive heating.

Key Takeaways

  • In a planning question, marks come from: clear variables, workable measurement method, control of variables, correct linearising graph, and extracting constants from gradient/intercept.
  • For fast transients, use an oscilloscope and a shunt resistor to measure current indirectly.
  • To test t1/Rt \propto 1/R, plot tt against 1/R1/R and use the gradient to find KK.

Common Mistakes

  • Trying to measure ms-scale changes with an ammeter (too slow).
  • Not stating how tt is defined/measured from the trace (needs a clear criterion).
  • Plotting tt against RR instead of 1/R1/R (won’t be linear for this model).
  • Forgetting to measure the actual resistor values (unmarked resistors cannot be assumed correct).
  • Failing to mention control of coil temperature/current (heating changes behaviour).

Things to Be Careful About

  • Keep the definition of “maximum current reached” consistent across all runs.
  • Ensure the shunt resistor is small and of suitable power rating; otherwise it alters the circuit significantly or overheats.
  • Choose a suitable range of RR so that tt values spread out enough to see a trend (not all clustered within timing resolution).
  • When extracting gradient, use a large triangle and correct units: tt in s\text{s} and 1/R1/R in Ω1\Omega^{-1}.
  • When calculating A=πr2A=\pi r^2, use rr in metres if you want SI consistency, and quote KK with appropriate significant figures based on measurement precision.
Techniques used
identify independent, dependent and controlled variablesmeasure a transient current using a shunt resistor and an oscilloscopelinearise a reciprocal relationship by plotting against the inverse variabledetermine a constant from the gradient of a best-fit linereduce uncertainty by repeating measurements and using suitable ranges

The rest of this paper

1 more questions
  • Q2Analysis, Conclusions and Evaluation15M
Loading the full paper…