9702/51

Physics 9702/51May/June 2019

Cambridge A-Level · Planning, Analysis and Evaluation · worked solutions for every part, with the mark scheme

2
questions
30
marks
75
minutes

Topics Analysis, Conclusions and Evaluation · Planning

Q115MPlanningAnalysis, Conclusions and EvaluationFree sample

A student is investigating the bending of a loaded wooden strip. Fig. 1.1 shows a rectangular strip of width bb and thickness tt overhanging the edge of a bench. A length LL of the strip is unsupported.

A load of mass MM is positioned at point P. This causes the unsupported part of the strip to bend with a deflection ss, as shown in Fig. 1.2.

It is suggested that the relationship between ss and LL is

E=4MgL3bst3E = \frac{4MgL^3}{bst^3}

where gg is the acceleration of free fall and EE is the Young modulus of the wood.

Design a laboratory experiment to test the relationship between ss and LL.
Explain how your results could be used to determine a value for EE.

You should draw a diagram, on page 3, showing the arrangement of your equipment. In your account you should pay particular attention to:

  • the procedure to be followed
  • the measurements to be taken
  • the control of variables
  • the analysis of the data
  • any safety precautions to be taken.
DifficultyMedium-Hard
Worked solution

Answer

Variables

  • Independent variable: unsupported length LL.
  • Dependent variable: deflection ss at the end (point PP).
  • Keep constant: load mass MM; position of load at PP (at the free end each time); strip material; width bb and thickness tt (use same strip); orientation of strip; point of support/clamping and method of support.

Apparatus and arrangement

Wooden strip, bench with sharp edge, clamp(s)/G-clamp to prevent slipping, mass hanger + slotted masses, metre rule (for LL), micrometer screw gauge/vernier callipers (for tt and bb), dial gauge / travelling microscope / ruler with set square (for ss).

Procedure / measurements

  1. Clamp the strip flat on the bench so it overhangs; mark the support edge as the reference line.
  2. Measure bb and tt at several positions with a micrometer/vernier; take mean values.
  3. Set a value of LL by sliding the strip so the overhang from the support edge to the free end is LL; measure LL with a metre rule.
  4. With no load, record the end position (zero reading).
  5. Hang a fixed load MM at point PP (the free end). When stationary, measure the vertical deflection ss (difference between loaded and unloaded readings).
  6. Repeat the reading of ss at least twice for the same LL and average.
  7. Change LL over a wide range (e.g. 6+ values) and repeat steps 3–6, keeping MM, bb and tt constant.

Analysis (test of relationship and determination of EE)

From

E=4MgL3bst3E = \frac{4MgL^3}{bst^3}

rearrange to

s=4MgEbt3L3 s = \frac{4Mg}{Ebt^3} L^3

So plot a graph of ss (y-axis) against L3L^3 (x-axis). If the suggestion is correct, the graph is a straight line through the origin.

Gradient mm is

m=sL3=4MgEbt3 m = \frac{s}{L^3} = \frac{4Mg}{Ebt^3}

Hence

E=4Mgmbt3 E = \frac{4Mg}{m b t^3}

(use mean b,tb,t, and the best-fit gradient).

Safety

  • Ensure the clamp and strip are secure so the mass cannot fall.
  • Keep feet clear of the falling zone; do not overload the strip (avoid snapping / sudden release).
Final answer

See working (plan and analysis).

Detailed explanation

Background Concept

A cantilever is a beam fixed at one end and free at the other. When a load is applied at the free end, the beam bends and the end drops by a vertical deflection ss. For small deflections (elastic behaviour), the deflection is related to the load and the geometry of the beam.

The question gives the suggested relationship

E=4MgL3bst3E = \frac{4MgL^3}{bst^3}

where:

  • EE is Young modulus (a material property)
  • MM is the load mass, so the force is MgMg
  • LL is the unsupported length (overhang)
  • bb is width and tt is thickness of the strip
  • ss is the deflection at the free end

To test the relationship between ss and LL, we want to see whether ss varies as a power of LL (here, proportional to L3L^3 when other quantities are fixed). To determine EE, we use the gradient of a suitable straight-line graph.

Understanding the Question

You must design an experiment (Paper 5 planning style):

  • Choose what you vary and what you measure.
  • Explain how you will measure LL, ss, bb, tt, and keep MM constant.
  • Explain how you will process data to check the suggested dependence of ss on LL.
  • Explain how to obtain a numerical value of EE from your results.
  • Include a labelled diagram of the apparatus and safety points.

The key idea is that you can control MM, bb, tt by keeping the same strip and same load, and vary only LL. Then measure ss for each LL.

Approach

  1. Choose variables: vary LL (independent), measure ss (dependent).
  2. Control variables: keep MM constant; keep the strip the same (so b,tb,t constant); always place the load at the same point (the free end).
  3. Measurement strategy:
    • Measure LL from the support edge to the free end.
    • Measure ss as the change in vertical position of the free end when loaded compared with unloaded to reduce zero-offset issues.
    • Measure bb and tt carefully (especially tt because it is cubed).
  4. Linearise the relationship so that a straight-line graph can be used:
    • Rearrange to s=kL3s = k L^3 where k=4MgEbt3k = \frac{4Mg}{Ebt^3}.
    • Plot ss against L3L^3; gradient gives kk, then solve for EE.

Step-by-Step Reasoning

1) Setting up the cantilever

Clamp the strip to the bench so one end is fixed and a length LL overhangs. The support must not slip during loading; otherwise the effective LL changes and ruins the data.

2) Measuring bb and tt

  • Use vernier callipers for bb.
  • Use a micrometer screw gauge for tt.
  • Take readings at several points along the strip and average because wood thickness may vary.

This matters because tt is in t3t^3, so a small percentage error in tt produces roughly three times that percentage error in t3t^3.

3) Measuring LL

For each trial:

  • Slide the strip so the overhang from the support edge to the free end is the chosen LL.
  • Measure LL with a metre rule; read at eye level to reduce parallax.

4) Measuring ss reliably

Directly measuring a small deflection with a ruler can be difficult. Better options:

  • Dial gauge with its tip under the free end.
  • Travelling microscope viewing a pointer attached at the free end.
  • A ruler fixed vertically with a set square or pointer to align with the end.

Crucially, record an unloaded reading and a loaded reading, then

s=(loaded position)(unloaded position) s = \text{(loaded position)} - \text{(unloaded position)}

This removes systematic offsets (e.g. the strip not being perfectly horizontal initially).

Repeat ss readings for each LL and average to reduce random uncertainty.

5) Choosing the data range

Use at least 6 values of LL spanning as wide a range as possible while staying in the elastic region (no permanent bend). A wide range gives a clearer trend and a more reliable gradient.

6) Linearising and extracting EE

Start from the given expression and rearrange for ss:

E=4MgL3bst3s=4MgEbt3L3E = \frac{4MgL^3}{bst^3} \quad \Rightarrow \quad s = \frac{4Mg}{Ebt^3} L^3

Let

y=s,x=L3 y = s, \quad x = L^3

Then

y=mx y = mx

with

m=4MgEbt3 m = \frac{4Mg}{Ebt^3}

So:

  • Plot ss on the y-axis against L3L^3 on the x-axis.
  • Draw a best-fit straight line.
  • Determine the gradient mm using a large triangle.

Finally, rearrange for EE:

E=4Mgmbt3E = \frac{4Mg}{m b t^3}

(Use consistent SI units: LL and ss in m\text{m}, bb and tt in m\text{m}, MM in kg\text{kg}.)

7) Considering uncertainty (what you would discuss in evaluation)

  • The main uncertainty often comes from measuring ss and from tt.
  • If you draw a worst acceptable line as well as the best-fit line, you can estimate uncertainty in gradient Δm\Delta m and hence uncertainty in EE.

Key Takeaways

  • A planning question must clearly specify variables, apparatus, measurements, and how the data will be analysed.
  • Testing sL3s \propto L^3 is best done by plotting ss against L3L^3 for a straight-line check.
  • Once linearised, the gradient links directly to EE.
  • Control of variables (fixed MM, same strip, load always at the free end) is essential for a valid test.

Common Mistakes

  • Varying MM as well as LL: then changes in ss cannot be attributed solely to LL.
  • Not stating how ss is measured (or not using the change from unloaded to loaded).
  • Plotting ss against LL instead of L3L^3, which will not produce a straight line.
  • Forgetting to measure bb and tt (or using a ruler for tt), giving very large uncertainty in EE.
  • Not keeping the load position fixed: moving the load changes the bending moment.

Things to Be Careful About

  • Keep units consistent; use metres for all lengths when calculating EE.
  • Ensure the strip does not slip in the clamp; any slip changes LL.
  • Avoid large deflections: the formula assumes small deflection and elastic behaviour.
  • Measure tt carefully; because of t3t^3, even a small reading error strongly affects EE.
  • When finding gradient, use a large triangle and compute Δy/Δx\Delta y / \Delta x (not x/yx/y).
Techniques used
identify independent, dependent and controlled variablesmeasure deflection relative to an initial zero to remove systematic offsetslinearise the suggested relationship and choose an appropriate graphdetermine a constant from the gradient of a best-fit linereduce random error by repeating readings and using a wide data range

The rest of this paper

1 more questions
  • Q2Analysis, Conclusions and Evaluation15M
Loading the full paper…