9702/52

Physics 9702/52February/March 2017

Cambridge A-Level · Planning, Analysis and Evaluation · worked solutions for every part, with the mark scheme

2
questions
30
marks
75
minutes

Topics Analysis, Conclusions and Evaluation · Planning

Q115MPlanningAnalysis, Conclusions and EvaluationFree sample

A student is investigating the speed of a vehicle on a track when a small ball is projected into the vehicle, as shown in Fig. 1.1.

The ball is projected towards the vehicle by a compressed spring. It is suggested that the relationship between the speed vv of the vehicle and its mass MM, after the ball embeds itself in the vehicle, is

kx2=(M+b)v2kx^2 = (M + b)v^2

where bb is the mass of the ball, kk is the spring constant and xx is the compression of the spring.

Design a laboratory experiment to test the relationship between vv and MM. Explain how your results could be used to plot a graph with 1/v21/v^2 on the yy-axis and to determine a value for kk. You should draw a diagram, on page 3, showing the arrangement of your equipment.

In your account you should pay particular attention to

  • the procedure to be followed
  • the measurements to be taken
  • the control of variables
  • the analysis of the data
  • any safety precautions to be taken.
DifficultyMedium-Hard
Worked solution

Variables

  • Independent variable: total mass MM of vehicle (add known masses).
  • Dependent variable: speed vv of vehicle immediately after the ball embeds.
  • Control: same ball (constant bb), same spring and same compression xx, same track (level), same launch position and alignment, same method ensuring the ball embeds (no rebound).

Apparatus

Dynamics track + trolley/vehicle, ball, spring launcher with latch, metre rule/vernier to measure xx, top-pan balance for MM and bb, light gate(s) + data logger, card/flag of known length on vehicle, additional masses, end-stop/catch box.

Procedure / measurements

  1. Measure mass of ball bb using a balance.
  2. Set track horizontal (adjust until trolley does not roll when released).
  3. Attach a card of length LL to the vehicle; place a light gate just after the collision region so it measures speed after embedding.
  4. Set spring compression to fixed xx (measure from uncompressed position with a ruler/vernier); latch and release in the same way each time.
  5. For a chosen added mass, measure total vehicle mass MM (vehicle + added masses) using a balance.
  6. Fire ball so it embeds in the vehicle; record vv from light gate using v=L/tv = L/t (where tt is the gate blocking time).
  7. Repeat at least 3 times for each MM and average vv.
  8. Repeat for at least 6 different values of MM.

Analysis

From

kx2=(M+b)v2kx^2 = (M+b)v^2

rearrange to

1v2=M+bkx2=(1kx2)M+bkx2.\frac{1}{v^2} = \frac{M+b}{kx^2} = \left(\frac{1}{kx^2}\right)M + \frac{b}{kx^2}.

Calculate 1/v21/v^2 for each MM and plot a graph of 1/v21/v^2 (y-axis) against MM (x-axis).
Gradient

m=1kx2m = \frac{1}{kx^2}

so

k=1mx2.k = \frac{1}{mx^2}.

(Intercept gives c=b/(kx2)c = b/(kx^2) as a check.)

Safety

Wear eye protection; keep hands/face away from the launcher; use a stop/end-buffer to prevent the vehicle leaving the track; ensure the ball is caught/contained after use; secure added masses to the vehicle so they cannot fall off.

Final answer

See working

Detailed explanation

Background Concept

The spring stores elastic potential energy when compressed. For an ideal spring,

E=12kx2E = \frac{1}{2}kx^2

where kk is the spring constant and xx is the compression.

In this question you are given (so you do not need to derive) the proposed relationship linking the spring compression to the speed of the vehicle after the ball embeds:

kx2=(M+b)v2.kx^2 = (M+b)v^2.

This has the structure “constant (\times x^2)” equals “(total moving mass) (\times v^2)”. To test such a relationship experimentally, you vary one quantity (here MM), measure the response (here vv), keep other factors fixed (xx, bb), and then look for a straight-line graph after rearranging to linear form.

Understanding the Question

You must design a workable lab experiment to test how the final speed vv depends on the vehicle mass MM when the same ball (mass bb) is fired into it by the same spring compression xx.

You are specifically asked to:

  1. Explain a procedure and the measurements.
  2. Explain control of variables.
  3. Show how to process the results to plot a graph with 1/v21/v^2 on the y-axis.
  4. Explain how to determine kk from that graph.

A diagram of the equipment arrangement is required.

Approach

  1. Choose MM as the independent variable: add known masses to the vehicle and measure total MM each time.
  2. Keep xx constant for all runs so the left-hand side kx2kx^2 is constant.
  3. Measure the speed after embedding using light gates (most direct and accurate in school labs).
  4. Repeat runs to reduce random error.
  5. Linearise the equation into the form y=mX+cy = mX + c with y=1/v2y = 1/v^2 and X=MX = M.
  6. Use the gradient to calculate kk.

Step-by-Step Reasoning

1) Choosing variables and how to vary them

  • Independent variable: MM (mass of vehicle after adding masses). This is easy to vary in steps by placing slotted masses on the vehicle.
  • Dependent variable: vv immediately after the ball is embedded. This must be measured after the collision, not before.
  • Controlled variables:
    • xx: spring compression. Must be set to the same value every time (measure and latch at the same mark).
    • bb: mass of the ball. Use the same ball throughout and measure bb once with a balance.
    • Track conditions: keep the track horizontal and the same surface/section used for each run.
    • “Embedding” condition: ensure the ball sticks each time (e.g. using putty/Velcro on the inside face of the vehicle). Rebound would change the energy/momentum transfer and invalidate the suggested relationship.

2) Measuring the speed vv

A standard method is a light gate and a card/flag of known length LL attached to the vehicle.

  • The data logger gives the time tt for which the light beam is blocked.
  • Then
v=Lt.v = \frac{L}{t}.

Place the light gate just after the impact region so the measured speed corresponds to “after the ball embeds”.

(Alternative acceptable methods include two light gates a known distance apart, or a motion sensor, but the key is: measure vv after the embedding.)

3) Collecting sufficient data

For each chosen MM:

  • Perform several launches (at least 3 repeats).
  • Average the measured vv to reduce random scatter.
  • Use at least 6 different MM values to make a convincing graph.

4) Linearising for the requested graph

Starting from the suggested relationship:

kx2=(M+b)v2kx^2 = (M+b)v^2

Divide both sides by (kx2v2)(kx^2v^2):

1v2=M+bkx2.\frac{1}{v^2} = \frac{M+b}{kx^2}.

Split the numerator:

1v2=(1kx2)M+bkx2.\frac{1}{v^2} = \left(\frac{1}{kx^2}\right)M + \frac{b}{kx^2}.

This matches y=mX+cy=mX+c with:

  • y=1/v2y = 1/v^2
  • X=MX = M
  • gradient m=1/(kx2)m = 1/(kx^2)
  • intercept c=b/(kx2)c = b/(kx^2)

So a plot of 1/v21/v^2 against MM should be a straight line if the relationship is correct.

5) Determining kk from the gradient

From

m=1kx2m = \frac{1}{kx^2}

rearrange:

k=1mx2.k = \frac{1}{mx^2}.

So you read/find the gradient mm from the best-fit line and substitute the known fixed compression xx.

A useful consistency check is that the intercept should satisfy

c=bkx2c = \frac{b}{kx^2}

so if you also know bb, you could compare the kk found from the gradient with that implied by the intercept (within experimental uncertainty).

6) Safety precautions (what and why)

  • Eye protection: the ball is a projectile.
  • Keep hands/face away from the spring launcher during release.
  • Use an end stop/catch tray so the vehicle/ball does not leave the bench.
  • Secure added masses so they cannot fall off and become hazards.

Key Takeaways

  • In a planning question, marks come from: clear variable choice, a workable measurement method, control of key variables, and a graph-based analysis.
  • Linearising to y=mX+cy=mX+c tells you exactly what to plot and how to obtain constants.
  • To measure a speed reliably, light gates + a measured flag length are a strong standard method.

Common Mistakes

  • Measuring the speed before embedding rather than after.
  • Failing to state that xx must be kept constant (or not explaining how it is set/repeated).
  • Not measuring MM with a balance (assuming added masses are exact without checking total mass).
  • Plotting the wrong graph (e.g. vv against MM) and not using 1/v21/v^2 as requested.
  • Forgetting to explain how to get kk from the gradient.
  • Vague safety statements (e.g. “be careful”) without identifying the hazard (projectile / spring / falling masses).

Things to Be Careful About

  • Ensure the ball truly embeds every time; any bounce changes the interaction.
  • Place the light gate so it measures the post-collision motion only.
  • Keep the track level: otherwise gravity adds/steals kinetic energy as the vehicle moves.
  • Use enough different MM values and repeats to get a meaningful best-fit line.
  • Keep units consistent: xx in m\text{m}, masses in kg\text{kg}, and vv in m s1\text{m s}^{-1}, so that kk comes out in N m1\text{N m}^{-1}.
Techniques used
identify independent, dependent and controlled variablesdesign a repeatable method to measure speed using light gateslinearise the given relationship to match a straight-line graphdetermine a constant from the gradient of a graphreduce random uncertainty by repeats and averaging

The rest of this paper

1 more questions
  • Q2Analysis, Conclusions and Evaluation15M
Loading the full paper…