Chemistry 9701/34 — May/June 2025
Cambridge AS Level · Advanced Practical Skills · worked solutions for every part, with the mark scheme
Topics Analysis, Conclusions and Evaluation · Manipulation, Measurement and Observation · Presentation of Data and Observations · Qualitative Analysis
Iron is an element that is essential in the human diet. Some people need to take iron supplement tablets to ensure an adequate intake of iron.
You will investigate the mass of iron in an iron supplement tablet by titrating a solution with potassium manganate(VII).
FB 1 is an aqueous solution of iron supplement tablets made by dissolving 14 tablets in of solution. The iron in each tablet is iron(II) sulfate, .
FB 2 is acidified aqueous potassium manganate(VII), .
FB 3 is dilute sulfuric acid, .
Method
- Fill a burette with FB 2.
- Pipette of FB 1 into a conical flask.
- Use the measuring cylinder to add of FB 3 to the conical flask.
- Perform a rough titration and record your burette readings in the space below.
The rough titre is .............................. .
- Carry out as many accurate titrations as you think necessary to obtain consistent results.
- Make sure any recorded results show the precision of your practical work.
- Record, in a suitable form in the space below, all your burette readings and the volume of FB 2 added in each accurate titration.
Rinse the burette with distilled water and leave to drain while you continue Question 1.
Results
Answer
A correctly completed results table for these titrations, using a model set of readings (your actual readings will differ), is shown below.
Rough titre: initial = 0.00 cm3, final = 19.25 cm3, titre = 19.25 cm3
| Titration | initial burette reading / cm3 | final burette reading / cm3 | titre / cm3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| accurate 1 | 0.00 | 18.90 | 18.90 |
| accurate 2 | 18.90 | 37.80 | 18.90 |
| accurate 3 | 0.00 | 18.85 | 18.85 |
All burette readings are recorded to the nearest 0.05 cm3, units are included in the column headings, and the accurate titres 18.90 cm3 and 18.90 cm3 are concordant (the third, 18.85 cm3, is within 0.10 cm3).
Example results: rough 19.25 cm3; accurate titres 18.90, 18.90, 18.85 cm3 (candidate-dependent)
Background Concept
A titration measures an unknown concentration by reacting a known volume of it with a solution of known concentration. Here FB2 is 0.0100 mol dm-3 KMnO4 and the solution being titrated contains iron(II). Manganate(VII) acts as its own indicator: while Fe2+ remains, added MnO4- is reduced and the solution stays colourless; after the end-point the first excess MnO4- gives a permanent pale pink colour. A rough titre finds the approximate volume needed, and accurate titrations are repeated until concordant values are obtained. Burette readings are made to the nearest 0.05 cm3.
Understanding the Question
This part asks you to carry out the titration and record raw data. The marks reward technique and recording, not a correct final value: a rough titre with two burette readings, initial and final readings for at least two accurate titrations, clear table headings with units, and readings recorded to 0.05 cm3. The results will be used later for calculations.
Approach
Record each initial and final burette reading as soon as it is taken. Subtract the initial from the final reading to obtain each titre. Present the data in a table whose headings include quantity and unit. Ignore the rough titre when later calculating the mean.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Fill the burette with FB2 and record the initial reading.
- Pipette 25.0 cm3 FB1 into a conical flask and add 10.0 cm3 FB3 from the measuring cylinder.
- Carry out a rough titration, recording initial, final and rough titre.
- Repeat accurately, adding KMnO4 dropwise near the end-point until one drop gives a permanent pale pink. Record initial and final readings to 0.05 cm3.
- Repeat until at least two accurate titres agree within 0.10 cm3.
- In the table, include units such as titre / cm3 in the headings and quote every burette reading to two decimal places ending in 0 or 5.
Key Takeaways
Good results tables have clear headings with units, readings are written down immediately, rough titrations are excluded from calculations, and concordant accurate titres are achieved by repeating the titration carefully.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the initial burette reading for the rough titration, or omitting units in headings.
- Recording burette readings to 0.01 cm3 instead of 0.05 cm3.
- Including the rough titre in the mean.
- Using different numbers of decimal places in different rows.
Things to Be Careful About
The burette is read at the bottom of the meniscus. A reading between two 0.1 cm3 divisions is estimated to 0.05 cm3, e.g. 18.90 or 18.85, never 18.93. The titre is final minus initial, not the final reading alone.
From your accurate titration results, calculate a suitable mean value to use in your calculations. Show clearly how you obtain the mean value.
of FB 1 required .............................. of FB 2.
Working
Tick the two concordant accurate titres: 18.90 cm3 and 18.90 cm3.
Mean titre = (18.90 + 18.90) / 2
Mean titre = 18.90 cm3
Answer
18.90 cm3
18.90 cm3
Background Concept
The mean titre used in later calculations must be based only on concordant accurate titrations. A rough titre is unreliable because it was not performed slowly near the end-point. The best mean uses the most consistent values; the mark scheme accepts two or more accurate titres within a total spread of 0.20 cm3, and identical values are preferred.
Understanding the Question
You are asked to choose a suitable mean titre from your accurate results and to show how you obtained it. The mean must be quoted to two decimal places and rounded to the nearest 0.01 cm3.
Approach
Look at all accurate titres, cross out any labelled rough or clearly non-concordant, then average the two (or more) closest values.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Identify the accurate titres: 18.90, 18.90 and 18.85 cm3.
- The two identical values 18.90 and 18.90 are the best pair; the third is slightly outside but not used.
- Mean = (18.90 + 18.90)/2 = 18.90 cm3.
- The answer is already to two decimal places.
Key Takeaways
A mean titre is meaningful only if the chosen values are concordant. Always show which titres were used, usually by ticking them or writing the calculation.
Common Mistakes
- Averaging all accurate titres, including an outlier.
- Including the rough titre.
- Leaving the mean with too many decimal places, e.g. 18.898.
Things to Be Careful About
Quote the mean to two decimal places, e.g. 18.90, and remember that 18.90 is different from 18.9 in a practical mark scheme because it shows correct precision.
Calculations
Give your answers to (c)(ii), (c)(iii) and (c)(iv) to an appropriate number of significant figures.
Answer
Quote the answers to (c)(ii), (c)(iii) and (c)(iv) to 3 significant figures (4 significant figures is also acceptable).
3 significant figures (4 significant figures also acceptable)
Background Concept
Calculated results should not be quoted with more significant figures than justified by the data. In this titration the concentration of KMnO4, 0.0100 mol dm-3, has 3 significant figures, and the molar mass 55.8 has 3. The numbers 5 and 40 in the later calculations are exact ratios, and 25.0 has 3 significant figures. So 3 significant figures is the appropriate precision; the mark scheme also allows 4.
Understanding the Question
This short part simply reminds you to use a sensible number of significant figures in the calculations that follow. It earns a mark by recognising that the final answers should not be over- or under-precise.
Approach
Use 3 significant figures for all three calculated values. If you prefer, 4 significant figures is also credited, but do not quote excessive digits such as 0.037802.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Examine the least precise measured values: 0.0100 (3 s.f.) and 55.8 (3 s.f.).
- The titre 18.90 has 4 s.f., but the product cannot be more precise than the 3 s.f. factor.
- Therefore present each final answer to 3 significant figures (or 4).
Key Takeaways
Significant figures reflect precision. For a multiplication or division, the answer is limited by the factor with the fewest significant figures.
Common Mistakes
- Quoting too many digits, e.g. 0.0377028.
- Confusing significant figures with decimal places.
Things to Be Careful About
A leading zero does not count as significant: 0.0378 has 3 significant figures. Exact numbers such as 5 and 14 do not limit precision.
Calculate the amount, in mol, of manganate(VII) ions in the volume of FB 2 in (b).
amount of = .............................. mol
Working
Answer
1.89 × 10^-4 mol
Background Concept
The amount of a solute is found from its concentration and volume: n = cV. Because concentration is in mol dm-3, volume must be in dm3. A titre in cm3 is converted by dividing by 1000.
Understanding the Question
Use the mean titre from (b), 18.90 cm3, and the given concentration of FB2, 0.0100 mol dm-3, to find the amount of manganate(VII) delivered.
Approach
Convert 18.90 cm3 to dm3, then multiply by 0.0100 mol dm-3.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- V = 18.90 cm3 = 18.90/1000 = 0.01890 dm3.
- n(MnO4-) = 0.0100 × 0.01890 = 1.89 × 10^-4 mol.
- The result is quoted to 3 significant figures.
Key Takeaways
Always convert cm3 to dm3 before using n = cV. The answer has moles as its unit.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to divide the titre by 1000.
- Quoting the amount as 0.000189 with no power of ten, which is fine but less clear.
Things to Be Careful About
0.0100 has 3 significant figures, while 18.90 has 4; the product is correctly rounded to 3 significant figures, 1.89 × 10^-4 mol.
Use your answer to (c)(ii) and the equations at the start of the question to calculate the concentration, in , of iron(II) ions in FB 1.
concentration of = ..............................
Working
From the equations, 1 mol reacts with 5 mol .
Answer
0.0378 mol dm^-3
Background Concept
The two half-equations show that one MnO4- ion accepts 5 electrons while each Fe2+ ion loses 1 electron. Therefore 1 mol of manganate(VII) reacts with 5 mol of iron(II). The amount of Fe2+ in the 25.0 cm3 sample is five times the amount of MnO4- used, and its concentration is amount divided by the sample volume in dm3.
Understanding the Question
Use the amount of MnO4- from (c)(ii) to find the concentration of Fe2+ in FB1. The volume of the sample is 25.0 cm3; the 10.0 cm3 of FB3 is not involved in the amount calculation.
Approach
Multiply n(MnO4-) by 5 to get n(Fe2+), then divide by 0.0250 dm3 to get concentration.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- n(Fe2+) in 25.0 cm3 = 5 × 1.89 × 10^-4 = 9.45 × 10^-4 mol.
- Convert sample volume: 25.0 cm3 = 0.0250 dm3.
- c(Fe2+) = 9.45 × 10^-4 / 0.0250 = 0.0378 mol dm-3.
Key Takeaways
The stoichiometry of a redox reaction is obtained by balancing electron transfer. Here the 5 in the calculation comes from 5e- per MnO4- ion.
Common Mistakes
- Using a 1:1 ratio instead of 5:1.
- Forgetting to convert 25.0 cm3 to dm3.
- Including the 10.0 cm3 of FB3 in the total volume (it is added to acidify, not to dilute the sample for this calculation).
Things to Be Careful About
The concentration is in mol dm-3. Use the same amount as in (c)(ii); if you changed your titre in part (b), carry your own value forward consistently.
Use your answer to (c)(iii) to calculate the concentration, in , of iron(II) ions in FB 1.
concentration of = ..............................
Working
Answer
2.11 g dm^-3
Background Concept
A concentration in mol dm-3 is converted to g dm-3 by multiplying by the molar mass in g mol-1. The units work out because mol dm-3 × g mol-1 = g dm-3.
Understanding the Question
Use the concentration from (c)(iii), 0.0378 mol dm-3, and the relative atomic mass of iron, 55.8, to express the concentration of Fe2+ in g dm-3.
Approach
Multiply the molar concentration by 55.8.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- c(Fe2+) = 0.0378 mol dm-3.
- Mr(Fe) = 55.8 g mol-1.
- c = 0.0378 × 55.8 = 2.11 g dm-3.
Key Takeaways
The factor 55.8 is the molar mass of Fe, not FeSO4·7H2O in this part, because the question asks for iron(II) ions only.
Common Mistakes
- Using the molar mass of hydrated iron(II) sulfate instead of 55.8.
- Forgetting the unit g dm-3.
Things to Be Careful About
The answer must be quoted to 3 significant figures, so 2.11, not 2.108. The decimal place in dm-3 is part of the unit.
The manufacturer of the iron supplement tablets used to make FB 1 claims that each tablet contains a minimum of of .
Use your answer to (c)(iv) and the information given about FB 1 to determine whether this claim is correct. Show your working.
Working
FB1 was made by dissolving 14 tablets in 1.00 dm3. The concentration 2.11 g dm-3 means there are 2.11 g of Fe2+ in 1.00 dm3, i.e. in the 14 tablets.
Mass of Fe2+ per tablet = 2.11 × 1000 / 14 = 151 mg
Answer
The claim is correct because 151 mg per tablet is greater than the stated minimum of 150 mg.
Yes, claim correct: 151 mg per tablet > 150 mg minimum
Background Concept
The concentration in g dm-3 tells you the mass of Fe2+ in each 1 dm3 of FB1. Since the tablets were dissolved in 1.00 dm3, this is also the total mass of Fe2+ in all 14 tablets. Dividing by 14 gives the mass per tablet.
Understanding the Question
Compare the experimental mass of Fe2+ per tablet with the manufacturer's minimum claim of 150 mg. You need to show working and state whether the claim is correct.
Approach
Convert 2.11 g dm-3 to mg per dm3, divide by 14, then compare with 150 mg.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Mass of Fe2+ in 1 dm3 = 2.11 g = 2110 mg.
- This is the mass in 14 tablets.
- Mass per tablet = 2110 / 14 = 150.7 mg, approximately 151 mg.
- Since 151 mg > 150 mg, the claim is correct.
Key Takeaways
When a solution is made from a known number of tablets, the concentration in g dm-3 can be converted to mass per tablet by scaling for the volume and dividing by the number of tablets.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to divide by 14.
- Comparing the concentration directly to 150 mg without scaling.
- Stating 'correct' without showing the calculation.
Things to Be Careful About
Use the unrounded value when possible: 2.11 × 1000/14 = 150.7 mg. The answer must include the comparison 'greater than 150 mg' to score the conclusion mark.
A student used all the FB 3 and suggests that dilute hydrochloric acid would be a suitable replacement.
Suggest whether the student is correct or not. Explain your answer.
Answer
No. Dilute hydrochloric acid is not a suitable replacement because chloride ions would be oxidised by manganate(VII) to chlorine, consuming extra KMnO4 and making the titre appear too large. Sulfuric acid should be used instead.
No — Cl- is oxidised by MnO4- to Cl2, so HCl would interfere with the titration
Background Concept
The manganate(VII) ion is a very strong oxidising agent, especially in acid. Sulfuric acid is used to provide the H+ ions needed for the reduction of MnO4- without introducing a species that MnO4- can oxidise. Sulfate is not oxidised under these conditions. Hydrochloric acid, however, provides chloride ions, which are reducing enough to be oxidised to chlorine by manganate(VII).
Understanding the Question
The question asks whether dilute hydrochloric acid can replace the dilute sulfuric acid used to acidify the titration mixture. A suitable acid must supply H+ without being oxidised itself.
Approach
Check whether chloride ions could react with KMnO4. Because MnO4- is a strong oxidant, it can oxidise Cl- to Cl2, so HCl would be consumed in a side reaction and would not be a clean source of acid.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- The titration needs an acidic medium so that MnO4- is reduced to Mn2+.
- H2SO4 supplies H+ and the sulfate ion is not oxidised by MnO4-.
- HCl also supplies H+, but its chloride ion can be oxidised: 2Cl- -> Cl2 + 2e-.
- Combining with the manganate half-equation: 2MnO4- + 16H+ + 10Cl- -> 2Mn2+ + 5Cl2 + 8H2O.
- This side reaction consumes extra KMnO4, so the titre would be too high and the calculated iron content too high.
Key Takeaways
A strong oxidising titrant such as KMnO4 must be used with an acid whose anion is not itself oxidised. Sulfuric acid is the usual choice.
Common Mistakes
- Saying 'yes because HCl is a strong acid' without considering chloride oxidation.
- Saying 'no because HCl is not an acid' (it is a strong acid).
- Forgetting that it is the chloride ion, not the HCl molecule, that interferes.
Things to Be Careful About
Hydrochloric acid is a strong acid, so lack of H+ is not the main problem. The key issue is the reducing chloride ion. In other contexts HCl may be acceptable, but not with KMnO4 in a titration intended to measure a reducing agent.
The reaction between an acid and an alkali is exothermic. You will carry out a neutralisation experiment to determine the enthalpy change involved.
You will mix different volumes of an acid with a fixed volume of an alkali and measure the temperature rises that occur.
FB 4 is aqueous sodium hydroxide, .
FB 5 is hydrochloric acid, .
Method
- Use the thermometer to measure the initial temperature of FB 4. Record this initial temperature in the space for results.
- Support the cup in the beaker.
- Fill one burette with FB 5. Label the burette FB 5.
- Fill the other burette with distilled water.
Experiment 1
- Use the pipette to transfer of FB 4 into the cup.
- Add of distilled water from the burette to the same cup.
- Add of FB 5 from the other burette to the same cup.
- Stir the mixture and use the thermometer to measure the maximum temperature. If necessary, tilt the cup so that the solution covers the bulb of the thermometer.
- Record the maximum temperature in Table 2.1.
- Empty, rinse and dry the cup ready for use in further experiments.
Further experiments
Repeat this method for Experiments 2–5, using of FB 4 and the volumes of water and FB 5 shown in Table 2.1. In each case, measure and record the maximum temperature.
Carry out two further experiments, Experiments 6 and 7, which will enable you to determine more precisely the volume of FB 5 that gives the largest maximum temperature. Record your measurements in Table 2.1.
Results
initial temperature of FB 4 = ..............................
Table 2.1
| experiment | volume of water / | volume of FB 5 / | maximum temperature / |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.00 | 1.00 | |
| 2 | 7.00 | 3.00 | |
| 3 | 5.00 | 5.00 | |
| 4 | 3.00 | 7.00 | |
| 5 | 1.00 | 9.00 | |
| 6 | |||
| 7 |
Answer
Results
initial temperature of FB 4 = 20.0 °C
Table 2.1
| experiment | volume of water / cm³ | volume of FB 5 / cm³ | maximum temperature / °C |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.00 | 1.00 | 21.5 |
| 2 | 7.00 | 3.00 | 23.5 |
| 3 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 25.0 |
| 4 | 3.00 | 7.00 | 24.0 |
| 5 | 1.00 | 9.00 | 22.5 |
| 6 | 4.00 | 6.00 | 24.5 |
| 7 | 4.50 | 5.50 | 24.8 |
Note: All thermometer readings end in .0 or .5. Volumes for experiments 6 and 7 are chosen to bracket the expected maximum (5.00 cm³) and sum to 10.00 cm³. Candidate-dependent actual readings will vary.
See representative data above; candidate-dependent readings required.
Background Concept
In Paper 3 practical examinations, candidates carry out an investigation and record their own data. For an enthalpy of neutralisation experiment, the goal is to find the exact volume of acid that completely neutralises a fixed volume of alkali. Since the concentration of the alkali (FB 4) is not given, we use a graphical method: plotting maximum temperature against the volume of acid added. The intersection of two lines of best fit (one for the rising temperature, one for the falling temperature) gives the equivalence point volume.
Understanding the Question
Part (a) requires the candidate to record the initial temperature, complete the results table for experiments 1–5 with correct precision, and design experiments 6 and 7 to narrow down the volume of FB 5 that produces the highest temperature. The mark scheme also checks the candidate's temperature rise in experiment 3 against the supervisor's value.
Approach
- Record the initial temperature of FB 4 to 1 decimal place (ending in .0 or .5).
- Record maximum temperatures for experiments 1–5 to 1 decimal place.
- Choose volumes for experiments 6 and 7 that bracket the volume giving the highest temperature in experiments 1–5 (which is 5.00 cm³). Ensure the total volume of water + FB 5 remains 10.00 cm³ for all experiments.
- Record all volumes to 2 decimal places.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Initial Temperature: Measured before mixing. Example: 20.0 °C.
- Experiments 1–5: Data is provided in the question. Maximum temperatures are recorded as they occur. Example values show a peak at experiment 3 (5.00 cm³ of FB 5).
- Experiments 6 and 7: To refine the result around 5.00 cm³, we choose volumes like 6.00 cm³ and 5.50 cm³ of FB 5, with corresponding water volumes of 4.00 cm³ and 4.50 cm³. Total volume is always 10.00 cm³. All volumes are recorded to 2 d.p. ending in 0 or 5.
- Supervisor Check: The examiner compares the candidate's temperature rise in experiment 3 (max T – initial T) with the supervisor's known value. A difference of ≤ 1.0 °C is acceptable.
Key Takeaways
- Always record thermometer readings to the correct precision (usually 1 d.p. ending in .0 or .5).
- When refining a graphical result, choose additional data points that bracket the suspected optimum.
- Keep total volumes constant if the method requires it, to ensure consistent heat capacity.
Common Mistakes
- Recording volumes to 1 d.p. instead of 2 d.p. (e.g., 9.0 instead of 9.00).
- Choosing volumes for experiments 6 and 7 that do not sum to 10.00 cm³.
- Not recording the initial temperature.
Things to Be Careful About
- Thermometer readings must end in .0 or .5 because the thermometer is typically marked in 0.5 °C intervals.
- Volumes from the burette must be read to 2 d.p. (e.g., 5.00 cm³, not 5 cm³).
- The total volume of liquid in the cup must remain 10.00 cm³ (10.0 cm³ of FB 4 + 10.0 cm³ of water/FB 5 mixture) to keep the heat capacity of the system constant.
Plot a graph of the maximum temperature (-axis) against the volume of FB 5 (-axis) on the grid. The scale on the -axis should be suitable for temperature readings to be above the largest maximum temperature.
Label any points you consider to be anomalous.
Draw two lines of best fit, the first for the increase in maximum temperature and the second for after the largest maximum temperature has been reached. Extrapolate both lines so that they intersect.
Answer
Graph description: Y-axis is 'maximum temperature / °C' (e.g., 19.0 to 26.0), X-axis is 'volume of FB 5 / cm³' (e.g., 0 to 10). Points plotted for experiments 1–7. Points for exp 6 and 7 may be slightly below the trend lines. Two straight lines of best fit drawn: one through exp 1–3 (rising), one through exp 4–5 (falling). Both lines extrapolated to intersect at approximately 5.00 cm³ and 25.0 °C.
See graph diagram above.
Background Concept
A temperature-volume graph for a neutralisation reaction typically shows a peak. As acid is added to alkali, the reaction is exothermic and the temperature rises. Once the alkali is completely neutralised, any further addition of acid (which is at a lower temperature) cools the mixture, causing the temperature to fall. The highest temperature occurs at the equivalence point. By drawing two lines of best fit—one for the rising part and one for the falling part—and extrapolating them to intersect, we can find the exact volume of acid that neutralises the alkali, even if the peak is broad or slightly off the plotted points.
Understanding the Question
Part (b)(i) asks the candidate to plot the data from Table 2.1, identify any anomalous results, and draw two lines of best fit that intersect. The y-axis scale must extend 2 °C above the highest maximum temperature.
Approach
- Axes and Scale: Y-axis: maximum temperature (°C). X-axis: volume of FB 5 (cm³). Y-axis scale should start below the initial temperature and go at least 2 °C above the highest max T (e.g., if max T is 25.0 °C, go up to 27.0 °C).
- Plotting: Plot all 7 points accurately.
- Anomalous Points: If a point (e.g., experiment 6 or 7) falls significantly below the expected trend line, label it as anomalous.
- Lines of Best Fit: Draw a line through the rising points (exp 1–3). Draw a second line through the falling points (exp 4–5). Extend both lines so they cross.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Axes: Label clearly with units. Use a suitable scale (e.g., 1 cm = 1 °C on y-axis, 1 cm = 1 cm³ on x-axis).
- Points: Plot (1.00, 21.5), (3.00, 23.5), (5.00, 25.0), (7.00, 24.0), (9.00, 22.5), (6.00, 24.5), (5.50, 24.8).
- Anomalies: In this representative data, exp 6 and 7 might be slightly low due to heat loss during the longer stirring time required for finer volumes. Label them if they are clearly off the trend.
- Lines: Line 1 passes through (1, 21.5), (3, 23.5), (5, 25.0). Line 2 passes through (5, 25.0), (7, 24.0), (9, 22.5). Extrapolate both to intersect at x = 5.00 cm³, y = 25.0 °C.
Key Takeaways
- The intersection of the two lines gives the equivalence point volume.
- Anomalous results should be plotted but ignored when drawing the lines of best fit.
- The y-axis must have sufficient range above the maximum temperature.
Common Mistakes
- Drawing a single smooth curve through all points instead of two straight lines of best fit.
- Forgetting to extrapolate the lines to their intersection.
- Using an incorrect scale on the axes.
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure the lines are straight (linear) for the two regions, not a curved line.
- The intersection point is read from the x-axis (volume of FB 5).
- Anomalous points must be explicitly labelled.
Use the intersection on your graph in (b)(i) to determine the volume of FB 5 required to neutralise of FB 4.
volume of FB 5 = ..............................
Answer
volume of FB 5 = 5.00 cm³
(Read from the x-axis value at the intersection of the two lines of best fit in part (b)(i).)
5.00
Background Concept
The graphical method for finding the equivalence point in a temperature-volume experiment relies on the fact that the temperature rises linearly (or near-linearly) as the reaction proceeds, and falls linearly as excess cold reagent is added. The intersection of these two linear regions gives the exact point of neutralisation.
Understanding the Question
Part (b)(ii) asks for the volume of FB 5 at the intersection point determined in part (b)(i).
Approach
Read the x-axis value (volume of FB 5) where the two extrapolated lines of best fit cross.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Locate the intersection point of the two lines on the graph.
- Draw a vertical line down to the x-axis.
- Read the value. In this representative example, the intersection is at 5.00 cm³.
Key Takeaways
- The intersection gives the volume of acid that exactly neutralises the alkali.
- Readings should be to the same precision as the axis markings (usually 2 d.p. for cm³ from a burette).
Common Mistakes
- Reading the y-axis value instead of the x-axis value.
- Not reading to the correct number of decimal places.
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure the line is drawn exactly vertically from the intersection to the x-axis.
- The value must be consistent with the stoichiometry if concentrations are known (not required here, but good for checking).
Calculations
Calculate the amount, in mol, of hydrochloric acid in the volume of FB 5 in (b)(ii).
(If you were unable to determine an answer to (b)(ii), use as the volume of FB 5. This may not be the correct answer.)
amount of = .............................. mol
Deduce the amount, in mol, of sodium hydroxide in of FB 4.
amount of = .............................. mol
Working
amount of
The reaction is:
The molar ratio is 1:1, so:
amount of
Answer
amount of = 0.0100 mol
amount of = 0.0100 mol
0.0100; 0.0100
Background Concept
The amount of substance (in moles) is calculated using the formula: , where is concentration in mol dm⁻³ and is volume in dm³ (or if is in cm³). In a neutralisation reaction between a strong acid and a strong base, the molar ratio is typically 1:1.
Understanding the Question
Part (c)(i) asks for the moles of HCl in the volume determined in (b)(ii), and then the moles of NaOH in 10.0 cm³ of FB 4. The mark scheme allows error carried forward from (b)(ii), but here we use the representative value of 5.00 cm³.
Approach
- Calculate moles of HCl: .
- Use the 1:1 stoichiometry to state moles of NaOH = moles of HCl.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Volume of FB 5 = 5.00 cm³ = 0.00500 dm³.
- Concentration of FB 5 = 2.00 mol dm⁻³.
- Moles of HCl = mol.
- Equation: .
- Ratio is 1:1, so moles of NaOH = 0.0100 mol.
- Answers should be given to 2–4 significant figures (0.0100 has 3 sf).
Key Takeaways
- Always convert volume from cm³ to dm³ by dividing by 1000.
- State symbols are not required for mole calculations but are good practice.
- Significant figures should be consistent (2–4 sf here).
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to divide volume by 1000.
- Using the wrong concentration.
- Not stating that moles of NaOH = moles of HCl.
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure the volume used is the one read from the graph in (b)(ii), not a default value unless instructed.
- Keep at least 3 significant figures in intermediate calculations to avoid rounding errors.
Calculate the energy change, in J, when the amounts of reagents in (c)(i) neutralise each other. Show your working.
energy change = .............................. J
Working
Total volume of solution =
Assuming density = , mass .
Energy change
Answer
energy change = 418 J
418
Background Concept
The energy change (heat evolved) in a solution is calculated using , where is the mass of the solution, is the specific heat capacity (usually taken as 4.18 J g⁻¹ °C⁻¹ for aqueous solutions), and is the temperature change. For dilute aqueous solutions, we assume the density is 1.00 g cm⁻³, so mass in grams equals volume in cm³.
Understanding the Question
Part (c)(ii) asks for the energy change in Joules when the amounts of reagents neutralise each other. The mark scheme provides the formula: Energy = .
Approach
- Calculate total volume: 10.0 cm³ (FB 4) + 10.0 cm³ (water + FB 5) = 20.0 cm³.
- Assume mass = 20.0 g.
- Calculate = max T – initial T.
- Apply .
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Total volume = 20.0 cm³, so mass g.
- °C.
- J.
- The answer should be to 2–4 significant figures (418 has 3 sf).
Key Takeaways
- The total volume is always 20.0 cm³ in this experiment (10.0 cm³ alkali + 10.0 cm³ acid/water mixture).
- is the difference between the maximum temperature and the initial temperature of the alkali.
- Energy is in Joules, not kJ.
Common Mistakes
- Using the wrong (e.g., max T – min T).
- Forgetting to convert J to kJ in the next step.
- Using the wrong mass (e.g., only 10.0 g instead of 20.0 g).
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme explicitly uses 20 for the mass. Do not use a different value unless justified.
- Keep the sign positive here; the negative sign is added in part (iii) for enthalpy change.
Use your answer to (c)(ii) to calculate the enthalpy change, in , when one mole of FB 4 is neutralised by one mole of FB 5.
enthalpy change = .............................. (sign and value)
Working
Enthalpy change
where is in kJ and is moles.
Answer
enthalpy change = -41.8 kJ mol⁻¹
-41.8
Background Concept
Enthalpy change of neutralisation () is the energy change per mole of water formed (or per mole of acid/alkali reacted). It is calculated as , where is the heat energy in kJ and is the number of moles. The negative sign indicates that the reaction is exothermic (heat is released to the surroundings).
Understanding the Question
Part (c)(iii) asks for the enthalpy change in kJ mol⁻¹ when one mole of FB 4 is neutralised by one mole of FB 5. The mark scheme requires the correct formula, a negative sign, and answers to minimum 2 significant figures.
Approach
- Convert energy from J to kJ: divide by 1000.
- Divide by the moles of NaOH (or HCl) from part (c)(i).
- Add a negative sign because neutralisation is exothermic.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Energy J = 0.418 kJ.
- Moles mol.
- kJ mol⁻¹.
- The value is negative because the reaction is exothermic.
- Answer to 3 significant figures (-41.8).
Key Takeaways
- Always convert J to kJ by dividing by 1000.
- Neutralisation is exothermic, so must be negative.
- The value is typically around -57 kJ mol⁻¹ for strong acid/strong base; -41.8 kJ mol⁻¹ is a realistic experimental value (lower due to heat loss).
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the negative sign.
- Forgetting to convert J to kJ.
- Dividing by the wrong number of moles.
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme explicitly requires the negative sign. Omitting it will cost a mark.
- Ensure the number of significant figures is at least 2.
Qualitative analysis
For each test you should record all your observations in the spaces provided.
Examples of observations include:
- colour changes seen
- the formation of any precipitate and its solubility (where appropriate) in an excess of the reagent added
- the formation of any gas and its identification (where appropriate) by a suitable test.
You should record clearly at what stage in a test an observation is made.
Where no change is observed, you should write ‘no change’.
Where reagents are selected for use in a test, the name or correct formula of the element or compound must be given.
If any solution is warmed, a boiling tube must be used. If a solid is heated, a hard-glass test-tube must be used.
Rinse and reuse test-tubes and boiling tubes where possible.
No additional tests should be attempted.
FB 6, FB 7 and FB 8 are aqueous solutions of different compounds that each contain at least one oxygen atom.
Carry out the following tests and record your observations in Table 3.1. Three of the tests have been done for you. Use a depth of solution in a test-tube for each test.
Table 3.1
| test | observations for FB 6 | observations for FB 7 | observations for FB 8 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test 1 Add a small spatula measure of manganese(IV) oxide. | No change. | No change. | |
| Test 2 Add a length of magnesium. | No change. | ||
| Test 3 Add a few drops of aqueous iron(II) sulfate. |
Answer
Observations to record in Table 3.1:
| test | FB 6 | FB 7 | FB 8 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test 1 (add MnO) | no change | no change | fizzing; heat released; gas relights a glowing splint |
| Test 2 (add Mg) | fizzing; heat released; gas pops with a lit splint | no change | no change |
| Test 3 (add FeSO) | no change | green precipitate; turns brown on standing | solution turns yellow/orange-brown; fizzing; gas relights a glowing splint |
Observations recorded in Table 3.1 (see working)
Background Concept
This part is about carrying out and recording qualitative tests. Three reagents are used, each probing a different property.
Manganese(IV) oxide, MnO(s), is a catalyst for the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide:
A catalyst provides an alternative reaction pathway of lower activation energy and is chemically unchanged at the end. The oxygen produced relights a glowing splint.
Magnesium metal reacts with acids to release hydrogen gas:
Hydrogen burns with a squeaky pop when a lit splint is held at the mouth of the tube. Magnesium does not react appreciably with alkalis or hydrogen peroxide under these conditions.
Iron(II) sulfate, FeSO(aq), contains Fe ions. With hydroxide ions it forms a green precipitate of iron(II) hydroxide, Fe(OH), which slowly oxidises in air to brown iron(III) hydroxide, Fe(OH). Fe is also a reducing agent: it reduces hydrogen peroxide to water and is itself oxidised to Fe, which gives a yellow/orange-brown solution.
Understanding the Question
You are given three unlabelled aqueous solutions (FB 6, FB 7, FB 8), each containing at least one oxygen atom. You must carry out three tests — adding MnO, adding Mg, and adding FeSO — and record all observations in Table 3.1. The instructions stress recording the stage at which each observation is made, naming reagents, and writing “no change” where nothing happens.
Approach
Rather than guessing, predict the chemistry of each solution with each reagent. The three solutions are ethanoic acid (CHCOOH), sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and hydrogen peroxide (HO). For each test ask: does this reagent react with an acid, an alkali, or with an oxidising agent such as HO?
Step-by-Step Reasoning
Test 1 — add MnO. Only HO is decomposed by the catalyst: expect fizzing (bubbles of O), heat released, and the gas relighting a glowing splint. The acid and alkali give no change.
Test 2 — add Mg. Only the acid reacts: fizzing (H), heat released, and a pop with a lit splint. NaOH and HO give no change.
Test 3 — add FeSO.
- With FB 6 (acid): no change.
- With FB 7 (NaOH): green precipitate of Fe(OH) forms; on standing it turns brown as it is oxidised to Fe(OH).
- With FB 8 (HO): the solution turns yellow/orange-brown (Fe → Fe) and fizzes as O is released; the gas relights a glowing splint.
Key Takeaways
The three tests are diagnostic: MnO detects HO (O given off), Mg detects an acid (H given off), and FeSO detects both an alkali (green Fe(OH) precipitate) and an oxidising agent (Fe → Fe, brown colour). Always pair a colour change or precipitate with the gas test that confirms the gas.
Common Mistakes
- Writing “bubbles” instead of “fizzing” — the mark scheme wants the specific observation.
- Recording a gas without testing it (e.g. “gas given off” without “relights a glowing splint” or “pops with a lit splint”).
- Forgetting to record “no change” for the solutions that do not react.
- Confusing the two gas tests: oxygen relights a glowing splint; hydrogen pops with a lit splint.
Things to Be Careful About
- Record observations at the correct stage (e.g. “on standing” for the Fe(OH) colour change).
- If a solution is warmed, a boiling tube must be used; if a solid is heated, a hard-glass test-tube.
- Name or give the correct formula of every reagent used.
- The mark scheme awards 2 asterisks per mark and rounds down, so partial observations still earn marks.
Use your observations in Table 3.1 to suggest a possible formula for each of FB 6, FB 7 and FB 8.
FB 6 ..............................
FB 7 ..............................
FB 8 ..............................
Answer
FB 6 = CHCOOH(aq)
FB 7 = NaOH(aq)
FB 8 = HO(aq)
FB 6 = CH3COOH; FB 7 = NaOH; FB 8 = H2O2
Background Concept
The observations in Table 3.1 are diagnostic fingerprints of the three compounds. An acid reacts with Mg to give H; an alkali gives a green Fe(OH) precipitate with Fe; hydrogen peroxide is catalytically decomposed by MnO to give O and oxidises Fe to Fe.
Understanding the Question
Using only the observations you recorded, suggest a possible formula for each of the three solutions. The mark scheme accepts any acid containing oxygen for FB 6 and any Group 1 hydroxide for FB 7, but the intended answers are CHCOOH, NaOH and HO.
Approach
Work backwards from each distinctive observation: FB 6 fizzes with Mg → acid; FB 7 gives a green precipitate with FeSO → alkali (OH); FB 8 fizzes with MnO and turns FeSO brown → HO.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- FB 6: reacts with Mg releasing H → contains H, i.e. an acid. The intended compound is ethanoic acid, CHCOOH.
- FB 7: gives a green precipitate with Fe → contains OH, i.e. an alkali. The intended compound is sodium hydroxide, NaOH.
- FB 8: decomposed by MnO to give O and oxidises Fe to Fe → hydrogen peroxide, HO.
Key Takeaways
Each qualitative test gives a unique fingerprint; matching observations to known chemistry identifies the compound.
Common Mistakes
- Suggesting a compound that does not fit all observations.
- Forgetting the “at least one oxygen atom” condition — any formula suggested must contain oxygen.
Things to Be Careful About
The mark scheme allows any acid containing oxygen for FB 6 and any Group 1 hydroxide for FB 7, so a correct but different formula still scores.
FB 9 contains two anions and two cations, three of which are listed in the Qualitative analysis notes.
To a small spatula measure of FB 9 in a test-tube, add a depth of dilute nitric acid. Record your observations.
Keep the resulting solution for the test in (b)(ii).
Answer
Fizzing/effervescence.
Solid dissolves to give a colourless solution.
Gas evolved turns limewater milky (white precipitate) — carbon dioxide.
Fizzing; gas gives white ppt with limewater (CO2)
Background Concept
Carbonates react with dilute acids to release carbon dioxide:
CO is confirmed by bubbling it through limewater (aqueous calcium hydroxide), which turns milky/cloudy due to the white precipitate of CaCO.
Understanding the Question
You add dilute nitric acid to solid FB 9 and must record what you see — fizzing, dissolution, and the limewater test on any gas. The solution is kept for part (b)(ii).
Approach
Expect a carbonate: fizzing (CO), the solid dissolving to a colourless solution, and the gas turning limewater milky.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
Solid FB 9 fizzes when nitric acid is added → CO is evolved. The solid dissolves to give a colourless solution. Passing the gas through limewater gives a white precipitate/milky appearance, confirming CO and hence carbonate ions.
Key Takeaways
The carbonate test: dilute acid → fizzing (CO) → limewater turns milky.
Common Mistakes
- Not attempting the limewater test — the mark scheme explicitly rewards “attempts limewater test”.
- Writing “bubbling” instead of “fizzing”.
- Confusing CO with other gases.
Things to Be Careful About
- Keep the resulting solution for part (b)(ii).
- Acid added to a solid: use a test-tube; if warming is needed use a boiling tube.
To the solution from (b)(i), add a few drops of aqueous silver nitrate. Then add excess aqueous ammonia. Record your observations.
Answer
Cream/off-white precipitate forms.
The precipitate is partially soluble (insoluble) in excess aqueous ammonia.
Cream ppt, insoluble in excess aqueous ammonia
Background Concept
Silver nitrate precipitates silver halides: AgCl is white, AgBr is cream/off-white, AgI is yellow. The precipitates differ in solubility in aqueous ammonia: AgCl dissolves in dilute ammonia, AgBr dissolves only in concentrated ammonia (partially soluble/insoluble in dilute), AgI is insoluble. Here excess aqueous ammonia is added.
Understanding the Question
Add a few drops of AgNO to the acidic solution from (b)(i), then excess aqueous ammonia, and record observations. A cream precipitate insoluble in ammonia indicates bromide.
Approach
Add AgNO → precipitate forms; add excess NH → observe whether it dissolves.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
AgNO with Br gives a cream/off-white precipitate of AgBr:
On adding excess aqueous ammonia, the cream precipitate is partially soluble/insoluble — consistent with AgBr (AgCl would dissolve). This confirms bromide ions.
Key Takeaways
Halide test: AgNO → precipitate colour; ammonia solubility distinguishes Cl (soluble), Br (partially soluble), I (insoluble).
Common Mistakes
- Describing the precipitate as white (that is AgCl) instead of cream.
- Saying the precipitate dissolves completely in ammonia (that would be AgCl).
Things to Be Careful About
- The solution from (b)(i) is acidic (contains HNO) — this is fine for the AgNO test.
- Record the colour precisely: cream/off-white.
Make an aqueous solution of FB 9 by adding a depth of distilled water to a spatula measure of FB 9 in a test-tube. Carry out the following tests on the aqueous solution of FB 9 and record your observations in Table 3.2.
Table 3.2
| test | observations |
|---|---|
| Test 1 To a depth in a boiling tube, add aqueous sodium hydroxide, then warm. | |
| Test 2 To a depth in a test-tube, add a few drops of dilute hydrochloric acid, then add a few drops of aqueous chlorine. Empty and rinse the test-tube with water immediately after use. |
Answer
Test 1 (NaOH then warm): no precipitate; on warming a gas is evolved which turns damp red litmus paper blue (ammonia).
Test 2 (dilute HCl then chlorine water): the solution turns brown/yellow.
Test 1: ammonia gas turns litmus blue; Test 2: brown/yellow solution
Background Concept
Two tests are used:
- Ammonium ion test: NH + OH → NH + HO on warming; ammonia gas turns damp red litmus blue.
- Bromide test: Cl oxidises Br to Br: Cl + 2Br → 2Cl + Br; bromine is brown/orange in solution.
Understanding the Question
Two tests on the aqueous solution of FB 9: (1) add NaOH then warm — tests for NH; (2) add dilute HCl then chlorine water — tests for Br.
Approach
Predict: NH gives ammonia on warming with NaOH; Br is oxidised to brown bromine by chlorine.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
Test 1: No precipitate forms (no metal cation that precipitates with OH); on warming, ammonia gas is evolved which turns damp red litmus blue → NH present.
Test 2: Chlorine water oxidises bromide to bromine, giving a brown/yellow solution → Br present.
Key Takeaways
NH is the common cation that gives a gas (NH) with NaOH on warming; Br is detected by displacement with chlorine to give brown bromine.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to warm for the NH test.
- Not testing the gas with litmus.
- Saying the brown colour is due to iodine (only if I present).
Things to Be Careful About
- Rinse the test-tube immediately after Test 2 (chlorine is hazardous).
- Use a boiling tube for the warming in Test 1.
Use your observations in (b)(i), (b)(ii) and Table 3.2 to deduce the formulae of the cations and anions in FB 9. If you are unable to identify an ion, write ‘unknown’.
cations .............................. and ..............................
anions .............................. and ..............................
Answer
cations: NH and unknown (Na)
anions: Br and CO
cations: NH4+ and unknown; anions: Br- and CO3^2-
Background Concept
Deduce ions from all observations: (b)(i) carbonate (CO with acid), (b)(ii) bromide (cream precipitate insoluble in ammonia), Table 3.2 Test 1 ammonium (NH on warming with NaOH), Test 2 bromide confirmed. The second cation is not detected by any test — it is the sodium ion (Na) from NaCO, hence “unknown” is acceptable.
Understanding the Question
Combine all evidence to name two cations and two anions. The mark scheme: NH and unknown; Br and CO.
Approach
List the ions each test identifies, then fill the gaps.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- (b)(i) fizzing with acid + limewater milky → CO.
- (b)(ii) cream precipitate insoluble in ammonia → Br.
- Table 3.2 Test 1 ammonia on warming with NaOH → NH.
- Table 3.2 Test 2 brown solution with chlorine → Br (confirms).
- The second cation is not identified by any test — it is Na (the compound is NaCO + NHBr), so write “unknown”.
Key Takeaways
Systematic deduction: each test identifies one ion; the remaining cation is inferred (Na) or left unknown.
Common Mistakes
- Writing Na without evidence (it is acceptable as “unknown”).
- Missing one of the four ions.
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme accepts “unknown” for the second cation.
- Ensure both cations and both anions are given.
Answer
Ag+(aq) + Br-(aq) -> AgBr(s)
Background Concept
Silver bromide is a sparingly soluble salt; the ionic equation for its precipitation removes spectator ions (NO and Na).
Understanding the Question
Write the ionic equation for the reaction in (b)(ii) — AgNO + Br → AgBr.
Approach
Identify the ions that react: Ag and Br combine to form AgBr(s).
Step-by-Step Reasoning
State symbols: Ag(aq), Br(aq), AgBr(s).
Key Takeaways
Ionic equations show only the species that change; spectator ions are omitted. State symbols are required.
Common Mistakes
- Including NO or Na in the equation.
- Missing state symbols.
- Writing AgBr(aq) instead of AgBr(s).
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme requires state symbols.
- The equation must be balanced in charge and atoms.
