Chemistry 9701/35 — May/June 2024
Cambridge AS Level · Advanced Practical Skills · worked solutions for every part, with the mark scheme
Topics Presentation of Data and Observations · Analysis, Conclusions and Evaluation · Manipulation, Measurement and Observation · Qualitative Analysis
Iodide ions in aqueous solution are oxidised to iodine by a variety of oxidising agents. One of these is the peroxodisulfate ion, , which reacts as shown.
Sodium thiosulfate is added to the reaction mixture to react with iodine as it is produced. When all of the thiosulfate has reacted, further iodine produced reacts with starch indicator to give a dark colour.
You will carry out two experiments to investigate how the rate of this reaction is affected by changing the concentration of the peroxodisulfate ion.
- FA 1 is potassium peroxodisulfate, .
- FA 2 is sodium thiosulfate, .
- FA 3 is potassium iodide, .
- FA 4 is starch indicator.
Method
Experiment 1
- Label one of the beakers A and the other beaker B.
- Fill one burette with FA 1. Label this burette FA 1.
- Run of FA 1 from the burette into beaker A.
- Fill the second burette with FA 2. Label this burette FA 2.
- Run of FA 2 from the burette into beaker B.
- Use the measuring cylinder to add of FA 3 to beaker B.
- Add 10 drops of FA 4 to beaker B.
- Add the contents of beaker A to beaker B and start timing immediately.
- Stir the mixture once and place the beaker on the white tile.
- Stop timing as soon as the solution turns a dark colour.
- Record this time to the nearest second in the space for results.
- Wash out both beakers and dry them using paper towel.
Experiment 2
- Run of FA 1 from the burette into beaker A.
- Run of FA 2 from the burette into beaker B.
- Use the measuring cylinder to add of FA 3 into beaker B.
- Use the same measuring cylinder to add of distilled water to beaker B.
- Add 10 drops of FA 4 to beaker B.
- Add the contents of beaker A to beaker B and start timing immediately.
- Stir the mixture once and place the beaker on the white tile.
- Stop timing as soon as the solution turns a dark colour.
- Record this time to the nearest second.
Record all your data in a table. You should include the volume of FA 1, the volume of distilled water, the reaction time and the rate of reaction for both experiments.
Use the following formula to calculate the rate of reaction.
Results
Answer
Example table using illustrative times (use your own recorded times):
| Experiment | volume FA 1 / cm | volume distilled water / cm | reaction time / s | rate / s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20.00 | 0.0 | 40 | 25 |
| 2 | 10.00 | 10.0 | 80 | 12.5 |
Ratio .
Example table: Experiment 1 rate = 25 s^-1; Experiment 2 rate = 12.5 s^-1; t2/t1 = 2.00 (illustrative).
Background Concept
This is an iodine-clock reaction. The peroxodisulfate ion oxidises iodide to iodine:
The iodine produced is immediately removed by thiosulfate:
Only when all thiosulfate has been used does iodine remain and form a dark blue-black complex with starch. The time measured is therefore the time needed to produce a fixed amount of iodine — the amount that reacts with all the thiosulfate present. The faster the reaction, the shorter this time. The rate is defined here as , so it is proportional to .
Understanding the Question
The question asks you to record your results from two experiments in a single table, including the volume of FA 1, the volume of distilled water, the reaction time and the rate. It also expects correct units, correct precision and correct calculation of rate using rate = . The ratio of the two times is then used to check the expected relationship.
Approach
First set up a table with four columns and correct headings with units. Record your readings with the required precision. Then calculate the rate for each experiment using the given formula. Finally compare the two times by calculating ; because Experiment 2 uses half the concentration of FA 1, you expect the rate to halve and the time to double, giving a ratio close to 2.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Table headings: volume of FA 1 / cm, volume of distilled water / cm, reaction time / s, rate / s.
- Experiment 1: FA 1 = 20.00 cm, water = 0.0 cm. Suppose time = 40 s. Rate = s.
- Experiment 2: FA 1 = 10.00 cm, water = 10.0 cm. Suppose time = 80 s. Rate = s.
- Ratio . This is within the expected range 1.90–2.10, consistent with rate being proportional to FA 1 concentration.
Your actual times will differ; the ratio should still be about 2.
Key Takeaways
- A results table must include all measured and calculated quantities with units.
- Precision matters: burette volumes to 2 decimal places ending in 0 or 5, measuring-cylinder volumes to 1 decimal place ending in 0 or 5, times to the nearest second.
- Rate = .
- The ratio of times gives a quick check of the concentration–rate relationship.
Common Mistakes
- Leaving out units or headings.
- Recording FA 1 volume as 20 instead of 20.00.
- Recording water volume as 10 instead of 10.0.
- Calculating rate as time/1000 instead of 1000/time.
- Using times not to the nearest second.
Things to Be Careful About
- The total volume must be the same in both experiments; water is used to compensate.
- The unit of rate is s, not cm s.
- The mark scheme accepts a range of ratios because times are candidate-dependent; the key is correct processing and precision.
Explain why the concentration of potassium peroxodisulfate used in each experiment is proportional to the volume of FA 1 used.
Answer
The total volume of the reaction mixture is the same in both experiments: of FA 1/water + FA 2 + FA 3 = . Therefore the amount (moles) of peroxodisulfate is proportional to the volume of FA 1 used, and since total volume is constant, its concentration is also proportional to the volume of FA 1.
Total volume is the same in both experiments, so [S2O8^2-] is proportional to volume FA1.
Background Concept
Concentration is amount of solute per unit volume: . If the total volume of a solution is kept constant, then doubling the volume of a stock solution added doubles the amount of solute and therefore doubles its concentration. If the total volume changed, the concentration would not be simply proportional to the volume added.
Understanding the Question
The question asks why the concentration of potassium peroxodisulfate in each experiment is proportional to the volume of FA 1 used. You need to compare the two reaction mixtures and notice that the total volume is the same in both, while the volume of FA 1 changes and is compensated by distilled water.
Approach
Calculate the total volume of each reaction mixture from the method. Show that in Experiment 1 and Experiment 2 the total volume is identical. Since concentration = amount/total volume, and the amount of is proportional to the volume of FA 1, concentration is proportional to the volume of FA 1.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
Experiment 1: 20.00 FA 1 + 0 water + 10.00 FA 2 + 20.0 FA 3 = 50.00 cm.
Experiment 2: 10.00 FA 1 + 10.00 water + 10.00 FA 2 + 20.0 FA 3 = 50.00 cm.
The total volume is the same. The amount of = concentration of FA 1 × volume of FA 1. Since the concentration of FA 1 is fixed, amount volume of FA 1. Dividing by the same total volume gives concentration volume of FA 1.
Key Takeaways
- Constant total volume is essential for concentration to be proportional to volume added.
- Water is used to keep the total volume constant when a smaller volume of FA 1 is used.
Common Mistakes
- Saying concentration is proportional to volume because “more FA 1 means more moles” without mentioning constant total volume.
- Forgetting that water is added to keep the total volume constant.
Things to Be Careful About
- Use “amount” or “moles” rather than “mass” when discussing concentration.
- The mark scheme accepts either “total volume was the same” or “volume of water + FA 1 is 20 cm in both experiments.”
A student thinks that the rate of reaction is proportional to the concentration of FA 1.
Complete Table 1.1 to suggest volumes of reactants that could be used in a further experiment to confirm whether the student is correct. Do not carry out this experiment.
Table 1.1
| volume / | volume | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA 1 | FA 2 | FA 3 | distilled water | FA 4 |
| 10 drops |
Answer
One suitable further experiment:
| FA 1 / cm | FA 2 / cm | FA 3 / cm | distilled water / cm | FA 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.00 | 10.0 | 20.0 | 15.00 | 10 drops |
FA1 5.00 cm3, FA2 10.0 cm3, FA3 20.0 cm3, water 15.00 cm3, FA4 10 drops.
Background Concept
To test whether rate is proportional to , you need a third experiment with a different concentration of FA 1 while keeping all other concentrations and the total volume the same. This is done by changing the volume of FA 1 and compensating with distilled water so the total volume stays 50.00 cm. The volumes of FA 2 and FA 3 must stay the same so that the amount of thiosulfate and the concentration of iodide are unchanged.
Understanding the Question
Complete Table 1.1 with volumes for a further experiment. The table already has FA 4 = 10 drops. You must choose a volume of FA 1 different from 20.00 and 10.00, and a volume of water that makes FA 1 + water = 20.00 cm, while keeping FA 2 = 10.0 cm and FA 3 = 20.0 cm.
Approach
Choose a convenient new volume of FA 1, e.g. 5.00 cm. Then set water = 20.00 − 5.00 = 15.00 cm. Keep FA 2 and FA 3 unchanged. Check that the total volume remains 50.00 cm.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- FA 1 = 5.00 cm (different from 20.00 and 10.00, and at least 2.5 cm).
- Water = 15.00 cm, so FA 1 + water = 20.00 cm.
- FA 2 = 10.0 cm, FA 3 = 20.0 cm.
- Total = 5.00 + 15.00 + 10.0 + 20.0 = 50.00 cm.
- This gives a concentration of FA 1 one quarter of that in Experiment 1.
Key Takeaways
- A dilution series keeps total volume constant by replacing part of the stock solution with water.
- All other reactant volumes must be kept constant to isolate the effect of FA 1.
Common Mistakes
- Choosing FA 1 + water not equal to 20.00 cm.
- Changing FA 2 or FA 3.
- Choosing FA 1 = 0 or too small to give a measurable time.
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme requires FA 1 + water = 20.00 cm and FA 1 at least 2.5 cm.
- FA 2 and FA 3 must be 10.0 and 20.0 cm respectively.
A student correctly carried out the method in (a) but had been given a more concentrated solution of sodium thiosulfate.
State how you would expect the student's times to differ from yours. Explain your answer.
Answer
The times would be longer. A more concentrated thiosulfate solution contains more thiosulfate, so it reacts with more iodine before the starch can turn dark; more iodine must therefore be produced, which takes longer.
Times increase; more thiosulfate reacts with more iodine, so more iodine must be produced before the blue colour appears.
Background Concept
Thiosulfate acts as a “clock” reagent: it removes iodine as it forms. The starch indicator only changes colour after all thiosulfate has been consumed. Therefore the time measured depends on the amount of thiosulfate present as well as on the rate of iodine production. More thiosulfate means more iodine must be produced before the colour change, so the time is longer.
Understanding the Question
A student used a more concentrated solution of sodium thiosulfate but otherwise the same method. You need to state how the times would differ and explain why.
Approach
Consider what thiosulfate does in the reaction. A more concentrated solution contains more moles of thiosulfate in the same volume. It will react with more iodine before the starch can show a colour. Therefore the reaction time increases.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- More concentrated thiosulfate = more moles of .
- Each mole of thiosulfate consumes iodine: .
- More iodine must be produced by the peroxodisulfate–iodide reaction before any iodine remains to react with starch.
- At the same rate, producing more iodine takes longer, so the recorded time increases.
Key Takeaways
- The measured time is not simply the time for the reaction to finish; it is the time to produce a fixed amount of iodine determined by the thiosulfate.
- The amount of thiosulfate affects the endpoint time even if the reaction rate is unchanged.
Common Mistakes
- Saying time would decrease because “more thiosulfate speeds up the reaction”.
- Forgetting that thiosulfate removes iodine rather than affecting the rate of the main reaction.
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme requires both “time would increase” and the reason “more thiosulfate reacts with more iodine / more iodine must be formed before it can react with starch.”
The potassium iodide is in a large excess in Experiments 1 and 2. Suggest why a large excess of iodide ions is needed in these experiments.
Answer
A large excess of iodide ions keeps the concentration of (or KI) almost constant throughout the reaction, so any change in rate is caused only by the change in concentration of .
Keeps [I-] effectively constant, so only [S2O8^2-] affects the rate.
Background Concept
In rate experiments, to investigate the effect of one reactant's concentration, all other reactant concentrations must be kept effectively constant. If a reactant is present in large excess, its concentration changes only very slightly during the reaction, so it can be treated as constant. This is sometimes called pseudo-first-order conditions.
Understanding the Question
The question asks why potassium iodide is in large excess in Experiments 1 and 2. The aim is to investigate how changing affects the rate. If iodide concentration also changed significantly, you could not tell which reactant was causing the rate change.
Approach
Explain that a large excess of iodide keeps almost constant throughout the reaction. Therefore any change in rate between experiments is due only to the change in .
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Iodide is consumed as the reaction proceeds: .
- If iodide is in large excess, the amount used up is tiny compared with the total, so stays almost constant.
- The only concentration that differs between Experiments 1 and 2 is .
- Hence any difference in rate can be attributed solely to .
Key Takeaways
- Excess reagent is used to keep its concentration effectively constant.
- This allows the effect of a single variable to be isolated.
Common Mistakes
- Saying “to make sure iodide is not the limiting reagent” without mentioning constant concentration.
- Not linking to the aim of investigating only the peroxodisulfate concentration.
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme accepts “concentration of KI/I remains almost constant” or “only the concentration of /KSO affects the rate.”
You will carry out an experiment to determine the enthalpy change, , when one mole of ammonium chloride dissolves in water.
FA 5 is ammonium chloride, .
Method
- Weigh the container with FA 5. Record the mass in the space for results.
- Support the cup in the beaker.
- Use the measuring cylinder to transfer of distilled water into the cup.
- Place the thermometer in the water and tilt the cup, if necessary, so that the bulb of the thermometer is fully covered. Record the temperature of the water at time .
- Start the stop-clock and leave it running for the whole experiment.
- Measure and record the temperature of the water in the cup every half minute for 2 minutes.
- At minutes, tip all the FA 5 into the cup. Stir the contents of the cup.
- Measure and record the temperature of the contents of the cup at minutes and then every half minute up to and including minutes.
- Weigh the container with any residual FA 5. Record the mass.
- Calculate and record the mass of FA 5 added.
Results
Answer
The candidate must record data in a clear, structured table. A representative example table is shown below.
Results Table
| Time / min | Temperature / °C | Mass of container + FA 5 / g | Mass of container + residual FA 5 / g |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 21.5 | 15.234 | 14.856 |
| 0.5 | 21.5 | ||
| 1.0 | 21.5 | ||
| 1.5 | 21.5 | ||
| 2.0 | 21.5 | ||
| 2.5 | — | ||
| 3.0 | 17.0 | ||
| 3.5 | 17.0 | ||
| 4.0 | 16.5 | ||
| 4.5 | 17.0 | ||
| 5.0 | 17.0 | ||
| 5.5 | 17.5 | ||
| 6.0 | 17.5 | ||
| 6.5 | 18.0 | ||
| 7.0 | 18.0 | ||
| 7.5 | 18.5 | ||
| 8.0 | 18.5 |
Calculations from recorded data:
Mass of FA 5 added =
Recording Conventions:
- Thermometer readings must be recorded to or (at least one of each type in the set).
- Balance readings must be consistent to 2 or 3 decimal places.
- All columns must have clear headings with quantities and units.
- The mass of FA 5 added is calculated by subtraction and must include the unit (g).
See working / candidate-dependent practical data recording
Background Concept
In calorimetry experiments, accurate recording of temperature and mass is essential for determining enthalpy changes. The temperature change () is typically small, so the precision of the thermometer and the consistency of decimal places in mass readings directly affect the reliability of the final result. Data must be presented in a clear table with unambiguous headings, quantities, and units.
Understanding the Question
Part (a) requires the candidate to record their experimental data during the dissolution of ammonium chloride in water. The mark scheme rewards correct data recording conventions: 16 temperature readings at half-minute intervals, two balance readings (initial and residual), the calculated mass of FA 5, and appropriate decimal places and units.
Approach
Since this is a practical paper (Paper 3), the candidate's actual data is not known. The solution demonstrates the correct format, conventions, and calculations that a candidate should produce to earn full marks for data recording.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Thermometer Readings: The candidate records the temperature every 0.5 minutes from to minutes (excluding when the solid is added). This gives 15 readings before and after mixing, plus the initial reading, totaling 16 readings. Readings must be to or (since the thermometer typically has graduations, readings are estimated to the nearest or ).
- Balance Readings: The mass of the container with FA 5 is recorded before adding the solid, and the mass of the container with residual FA 5 is recorded after. Both must be to the same number of decimal places (2 or 3).
- Mass Calculation: The mass of FA 5 added is the difference between the two balance readings. This must include the unit (g).
- Table Formatting: Columns must have clear headings with units (e.g., "Time / min", "Temperature / °C").
Key Takeaways
- Always include units in table headings.
- Maintain consistent decimal places for repeated measurements.
- Calculate derived quantities (like mass added) and include units.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to include units in table headings.
- Recording thermometer readings to when the instrument only has graduations.
- Inconsistent decimal places in balance readings (e.g., one to 2 d.p. and one to 3 d.p.).
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme allows accuracy marks based on how close the candidate's is to the supervisor's value. Ensure readings are taken correctly and recorded without transcription errors.
Plot a graph of temperature (-axis) against time (-axis) on the grid. You should choose a scale that allows you to plot below the minimum temperature reached.
Label any points you consider to be anomalous.
Draw two straight lines of best fit. One line is for the temperature before adding FA 5 and the other line is for the warming of the solution once the minimum temperature has been reached.
Extrapolate both these lines to minutes.
Answer
The graph must be plotted with the following conventions:
- Axes: -axis = Temperature / °C, -axis = Time / min. Both must have unambiguous labels and units.
- Scales: Use linear scales based on 1, 2, or 5. The scale must be chosen so that plotted points occupy more than half the available space along each axis. The -axis must extend at least below the minimum temperature recorded.
- Plotting: All temperature points must be plotted correctly to within half a small square. A minimum of 9 temperatures must be plotted (excluding the point at ).
- Lines of Best Fit: Draw two straight lines of best fit:
- One for the temperature before adding FA 5 (should be roughly horizontal or slightly sloping due to heat exchange with surroundings).
- One for the warming of the solution after the minimum temperature is reached (should have a positive slope).
- Extrapolation: Both lines must be extrapolated to minutes. The temperature at minutes read from the extrapolated lines must be less than or equal to the lowest temperature recorded.
Working
Example Graph Construction:
- -axis: 0 to 9 min, 1 cm = 0.5 min.
- -axis: 14 to 24 °C, 1 cm = 1 °C (ensures > half space and includes 2 °C below minimum).
- Plot points: (0.0, 21.5), (0.5, 21.5), ..., (2.0, 21.5), (3.0, 17.0), (3.5, 17.0), (4.0, 16.5), (4.5, 17.0), ..., (8.0, 18.5).
- Line 1 (pre-mixing): passes through points at to , extrapolated to → .
- Line 2 (post-minimum): passes through points at to , extrapolated to → .
- .
See diagram / candidate-dependent graph plotting
Background Concept
In calorimetry, heat is exchanged between the reaction and the surroundings (including the cup, thermometer, and air). This causes the temperature to drift slightly before and after the reaction. To find the true temperature change at the moment of mixing ( min), we use extrapolation. We draw a line of best fit through the pre-mixing data and another through the post-minimum data, and extrapolate both to min. The difference between these extrapolated temperatures gives the corrected .
Understanding the Question
Part (b) requires the candidate to plot a temperature-time graph, draw two lines of best fit, and extrapolate them to minutes. The mark scheme specifies strict rules for axis labels, scales, plotting accuracy, and line drawing.
Approach
Describe the correct graph plotting technique: choose appropriate scales, plot points accurately, draw two distinct lines of best fit for the pre- and post-mixing phases, and extrapolate to the mixing time.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Axis Labels and Units: The -axis must be labeled "Temperature / °C" and the -axis "Time / min". Unambiguous labels are required.
- Scale Selection: Use linear scales based on 1, 2, or 5. The plotted points must occupy more than half the available space. The -axis must extend at least below the minimum recorded temperature to allow for clear extrapolation.
- Plotting Points: Plot all valid temperature readings. Points at min are not plotted (the solid is being added). A minimum of 9 temperatures must be plotted.
- Lines of Best Fit:
- Line 1: Fit through the initial temperature readings ( to ). This line accounts for any heat loss/gain before mixing.
- Line 2: Fit through the warming phase after the minimum temperature ( to ). This line accounts for heat gain from the surroundings after mixing.
- Extrapolation: Extend both lines to min. The temperature read from Line 1 at is the corrected initial temperature (). The temperature read from Line 2 at is the corrected final temperature (). The corrected .
Key Takeaways
- Extrapolation corrects for heat exchange with surroundings during the time taken to add the solid and start stirring.
- The extrapolated temperature at min must be less than or equal to the lowest recorded temperature (since the minimum occurs at or after min).
Common Mistakes
- Using a non-linear scale.
- Failing to extend the -axis below the minimum temperature.
- Drawing only one line of best fit instead of two.
- Not extrapolating the lines to min.
- Reading the temperature from the graph at min that is higher than the lowest recorded temperature.
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure the lines of best fit are straight and pass as close to the points as possible, with an equal number of points on either side.
- The extrapolated temperature at min from the post-mixing line should be the minimum temperature (or lower than the lowest recorded point if the minimum occurred slightly after 2.5 min).
Diagram Description for Part (b):
A temperature-time graph for the dissolution of ammonium chloride.
- -axis: Time / min, ranging from 0 to 9, with major divisions every 1 min and minor divisions every 0.5 min.
- -axis: Temperature / °C, ranging from 14 to 24, with major divisions every 2 °C and minor divisions every 1 °C.
- Data points: Plotted at (0.0, 21.5), (0.5, 21.5), (1.0, 21.5), (1.5, 21.5), (2.0, 21.5), (3.0, 17.0), (3.5, 17.0), (4.0, 16.5), (4.5, 17.0), (5.0, 17.0), (5.5, 17.5), (6.0, 17.5), (6.5, 18.0), (7.0, 18.0), (7.5, 18.5), (8.0, 18.5).
- Line 1 (pre-mixing): A horizontal line at from to .
- Line 2 (post-minimum): A line with a positive slope passing through the points from to , extrapolated back to where .
- Extrapolation: Both lines meet at min, showing and .
Answer
From the extrapolated lines on the graph at minutes:
- Initial temperature (extrapolated from pre-mixing line):
- Final temperature (extrapolated from post-mixing line):
Working
4.5
Background Concept
The temperature change () in a calorimetry experiment is the difference between the initial temperature (before mixing) and the final temperature (after the reaction is complete and the solution has reached thermal equilibrium). In practice, because mixing takes time and heat is exchanged with the surroundings, the true is found by extrapolating the temperature-time graph to the moment of mixing ( min).
Understanding the Question
Part (c)(i) asks the candidate to determine at minutes using the extrapolated values from the graph drawn in part (b). The value must be given to 1 decimal place.
Approach
Read the extrapolated temperatures from the two lines of best fit at minutes and calculate the difference.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Read Extrapolated Temperatures: At min, read the temperature from Line 1 (pre-mixing extrapolation) and Line 2 (post-minimum extrapolation).
- Calculate : . Since the dissolution is endothermic, the temperature drops, so is positive.
- Example Calculation: If and , then .
Key Takeaways
- is always a positive value for endothermic reactions (initial - final).
- Use the extrapolated values, not the directly recorded temperatures.
Common Mistakes
- Reading the temperature from the graph at min instead of extrapolating.
- Calculating as final - initial, resulting in a negative value.
- Not giving the answer to 1 decimal place.
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure the extrapolated temperature at min from the post-mixing line is less than or equal to the lowest recorded temperature.
- The value must be read accurately from the graph to 1 decimal place.
Working
The energy change () in the solution is calculated using the equation:
where:
- = mass of water = (assuming density of water = )
- = specific heat capacity of water =
- = temperature change from (c)(i) =
Answer
Energy change = (or )
(Accept answers to 2–4 significant figures: 470, 470.3)
470
Background Concept
The energy change () absorbed or released by a solution in a calorimetry experiment is calculated using the formula , where is the mass of the solution, is the specific heat capacity, and is the temperature change. For dilute aqueous solutions, we assume the density is (so ) and the specific heat capacity is the same as water (). We ignore the mass of the dissolved solid and the heat capacity of the cup and thermometer.
Understanding the Question
Part (c)(ii) asks the candidate to calculate the energy change in Joules using the volume of water, the specific heat capacity of water, and the from part (c)(i).
Approach
Use with , , and .
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Identify Variables: , , .
- Substitute: .
- Calculate: .
- Significant Figures: The mark scheme allows 2–4 significant figures, so or is acceptable.
Key Takeaways
- Always use the mass of the solution (or water, for dilute solutions) in grams.
- The specific heat capacity of water is .
- The energy change is in Joules (J).
Common Mistakes
- Using the volume in cm³ instead of mass in g (though numerically the same for water, the unit must be g).
- Forgetting to multiply by .
- Not converting the final answer to the correct number of significant figures.
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme specifically states: . Ensure you use 25, not 25.0 + mass of solute.
- The answer must be in J, not kJ.
Working
The amount of ammonium chloride () is calculated using:
where:
- = mass of FA 5 added from (a) =
- of =
Answer
Amount of ammonium chloride = (or )
(Accept answers to 2–4 significant figures: 0.00707, 0.007065)
0.00707
Background Concept
The amount of substance in moles () is calculated from the mass () and the relative formula mass () using the equation . For ammonium chloride (), .
Understanding the Question
Part (c)(iii) asks the candidate to calculate the amount of ammonium chloride used in moles, using the mass recorded in part (a).
Approach
Use with the mass from (a) and .
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Identify Variables: (from part a), .
- Substitute: .
- Calculate: .
- Significant Figures: The mark scheme allows 2–4 significant figures, so or is acceptable.
Key Takeaways
- Always calculate correctly from the chemical formula.
- Use the mass added (difference between initial and residual masses), not the initial mass alone.
Common Mistakes
- Using the wrong (e.g., forgetting the chlorine atom).
- Using the initial mass of the container + FA 5 instead of the mass of FA 5 added.
- Incorrect significant figures.
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme states: . Ensure you use the correct mass value.
Calculate the enthalpy change, , in , when one mole of ammonium chloride dissolves in water.
Working
The enthalpy change () is calculated using:
where:
- = energy change from (c)(ii) =
- = amount of from (c)(iii) =
- The factor converts J to kJ.
Since the temperature decreased, the reaction is endothermic, so is positive.
Answer
(Accept answers to 2–4 significant figures with correct sign: +67, +66.6, +66.56)
+66.6
Background Concept
The enthalpy change () per mole is calculated by dividing the energy change () by the amount of substance () and converting to kJ mol⁻¹. For endothermic reactions (temperature decreases), is positive. For exothermic reactions (temperature increases), is negative.
Understanding the Question
Part (c)(iv) asks the candidate to calculate in kJ mol⁻¹, including the correct sign. The energy change is from (c)(ii) and the amount is from (c)(iii).
Approach
Use , ensuring the sign is correct based on whether the temperature increased or decreased.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Identify Variables: , .
- Substitute: .
- Calculate: .
- Determine Sign: The temperature dropped (endothermic), so is positive: .
- Significant Figures: The mark scheme allows 2–4 significant figures, so , , or is acceptable.
Key Takeaways
- Always include the sign for (+ for endothermic, - for exothermic).
- Convert J to kJ by dividing by 1000 (or multiplying by 1000 when the formula is set up as ).
- Use the values from previous parts, even if they are wrong (error carried forward).
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the sign (mark scheme explicitly requires correct sign).
- Forgetting to convert J to kJ.
- Using the wrong value for or .
- Incorrect significant figures.
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme states: . Ensure you follow this exactly.
- The sign must be explicitly stated: + or -.
Use your results in (a) to calculate the maximum percentage error for the temperature change from 0 to 4 minutes.
Assume that the maximum uncertainty in a single thermometer reading is .
Show your working.
Working
The temperature change is calculated from two thermometer readings ( at and at min).
- Uncertainty in a single reading =
- Absolute uncertainty in = (since two readings are subtracted)
The maximum percentage error is:
Using the example values from the graph:
- (recorded at min)
Answer
Maximum percentage error =
(Accept any correct expression and candidate-dependent value)
20
Background Concept
When a quantity is calculated from two measurements (e.g., ), the absolute uncertainties add together. If each reading has an uncertainty of , the uncertainty in the difference is . The percentage error is then calculated as (absolute uncertainty / measured value) .
Understanding the Question
Part (d) asks the candidate to calculate the maximum percentage error for the temperature change from 0 to 4 minutes, given that the uncertainty in a single thermometer reading is .
Approach
Determine the absolute uncertainty in by adding the uncertainties of the two readings, then calculate the percentage error using the formula.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Identify Readings: (at min) and (at min).
- Calculate : .
- Determine Absolute Uncertainty: Since is a difference of two readings, the absolute uncertainty is .
- Calculate Percentage Error: .
- Example Calculation: If and , then . Percentage error = .
Key Takeaways
- Uncertainties in addition or subtraction add together.
- Percentage error = (absolute uncertainty / measured value) .
- The mark scheme accepts the general expression: .
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to double the uncertainty (only using instead of ).
- Calculating percentage error using the wrong (e.g., using the extrapolated instead of the recorded from 0 to 4 min).
- Not multiplying by 100.
Things to Be Careful About
- The question specifically asks for the temperature change from 0 to 4 minutes, not the extrapolated .
- Use the recorded temperatures at and min for this calculation.
- The mark scheme gives the expression: .
Qualitative analysis
For each test you should record all your observations in the spaces provided.
Examples of observations include:
- colour changes seen
- the formation of any precipitate and its solubility (where appropriate) in an excess of the reagent added
- the formation of any gas and its identification (where appropriate) by a suitable test.
You should record clearly at what stage in a test an observation is made.
Where no change is observed, you should write 'no change'.
Where reagents are selected for use in a test, the name or correct formula of the element or compound must be given.
If any solution is warmed, a boiling tube must be used. If a solid is heated, a hard-glass test-tube must be used.
Rinse and reuse test-tubes and boiling tubes where possible.
No additional tests should be attempted.
FA 6 is a salt containing a Group 1 ion and an anion that consists of a transition metal and a non-metal element.
Transfer FA 6 into a hard-glass test-tube. Heat the tube gently at first and then strongly. Record all your observations and identify the gas produced.
The residue is FA 7. You will use FA 7 in (a)(ii).
Answer
- FA 6 is dark purple crystals.
- On gentle then strong heating the solid jumps around and becomes darker; a black residue forms.
- A gas is produced that relights a glowing splint — this is oxygen.
Oxygen; observations: purple crystals, solid jumps around, black residue forms
Background Concept
Potassium manganate(VII), , is a purple crystalline ionic solid. When heated strongly it undergoes thermal decomposition:
The residue contains potassium manganate(VI) (, dark green) and manganese(IV) oxide (, black). The gas evolved is oxygen, a colourless gas that supports combustion — a glowing splint relights in it.
Understanding the Question
FA 6 is described as a salt containing a Group 1 ion (potassium) and an anion made of a transition metal and a non-metal — this is . The task is to heat the solid gently then strongly, record all observations, and identify the gas produced. This is a classic qualitative-analysis gas test.
Approach
Heat gently first, then strongly. Watch for colour changes of the solid, physical movement (decrepitation), and gas evolution. Test the gas with a glowing splint and record the result.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Initial appearance: dark purple crystals — record this as the starting observation.
- On gentle heating: the crystals jump/spit (decrepitation) as gas is released; the solid begins to darken.
- On strong heating: a black residue () forms.
- Gas test: insert a glowing splint into the tube — it relights, confirming oxygen.
Each of these is a separate mark: two observations about the solid (purple crystals, jumping, black residue — any two), one for the splint relighting, and one for identifying the gas as oxygen.
Key Takeaways
- decomposes on strong heating to , and .
- Oxygen relights a glowing splint — the definitive test.
- The black residue is .
Common Mistakes
- Failing to test the gas — you must carry out and record the splint test to identify oxygen.
- Writing "brown gas" — oxygen is colourless; the colour change is in the solid, not the gas.
- Not stating the stage at which the observation occurs (e.g., "on gentle heating" vs "on strong heating").
Things to Be Careful About
- Use a hard-glass test-tube when heating a solid.
- Record the colour of the solid before, during and after heating.
- The splint test must be described as "relights a glowing splint".
Allow FA 7 to cool before starting (a)(ii).
While FA 7 is cooling you may wish to continue with (b)(i).
Put a depth of acidified aqueous potassium manganate(VII) in a test-tube. Add the same depth of aqueous sodium hydroxide. Then add FA 7 and stir using the glass rod for about 30 seconds. Filter the mixture and collect the filtrate.
Record your observations.
Put a depth of the filtrate in a test-tube. Add sulfuric acid until in excess.
Record your observations.
Answer
- The filtrate is dark green.
- On adding excess sulfuric acid, the solution turns pink/purple.
Filtrate dark green; turns pink/purple on acidification
Background Concept
Manganate(VII), , is purple. In strongly alkaline solution, in the presence of manganese(IV) oxide (, which is FA 7, the residue from (a)(i)), manganate(VII) is reduced to manganate(VI), , which is dark green. On acidification, manganate(VI) disproportionates:
The green solution therefore turns back to pink/purple (manganate(VII)) with a dark precipitate of .
Understanding the Question
The procedure is: acidified is made alkaline by adding sodium hydroxide, then FA 7 (the residue from (a)(i)) is added and the mixture stirred for about 30 seconds. The mixture is filtered, and the filtrate is then acidified with excess sulfuric acid. You must record what you see at each stage.
Approach
Track the colour of the solution through the stages: purple (alkaline ) → dark green (after adding FA 7, ) → pink/purple (after acidification, back to ).
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- The acidified is made alkaline with — it remains purple.
- Adding FA 7 () reduces to — the solution becomes dark green. This is M1.
- Filtering removes the excess solid; the filtrate is dark green.
- Adding excess sulfuric acid acidifies the solution; disproportionates back to — the solution turns pink/purple. This is M2.
Key Takeaways
- is purple; is dark green.
- disproportionates in acid to and .
- catalyses the reduction of manganate(VII) in alkaline solution.
Common Mistakes
- Saying the filtrate is purple — it is dark green before acidification.
- Missing the colour change on acidification (pink/purple).
- Confusing the two stages and reporting the colours in the wrong order.
Things to Be Careful About
- The filtrate is dark green, not purple.
- On acidification the solution turns pink/purple — record this as a distinct observation.
- The question asks for observations in two places: after filtration and after adding acid.
FA 8 and FA 9 are both aqueous solutions of salts. FA 8 contains one cation and one anion. FA 9 contains two cations and one anion. One of the cations and both anions are listed in the Qualitative analysis notes.
Carry out the following tests and record your observations in Table 3.1.
For each test use a depth of FA 8 or FA 9 in a test-tube.
Table 3.1
| test | observations: FA 8 | observations: FA 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Test 1 Add sulfuric acid. | ||
| Test 2 Add aqueous sodium hydroxide, then | ||
| transfer the mixture into a boiling tube and warm. | ||
| Test 3 Add a few drops of aqueous barium chloride or aqueous barium nitrate, then | ||
| add nitric acid. | ||
| Test 4 Add FA 8 with shaking until in excess. |
Answer
| test | observations: FA 8 | observations: FA 9 |
|---|---|---|
| Test 1 — add | Effervescence; gas turns limewater milky () | No change / solution stays blue |
| Test 2 — add , then warm | No change; on warming, no change / no gas | Pale blue precipitate, insoluble in excess; on warming, precipitate turns black |
| Test 3 — add / , then | White precipitate; effervescence with acid; precipitate dissolves | White precipitate; insoluble in acid / no change |
| Test 4 — add FA 8 in excess | — | Effervescence; pale blue precipitate |
Completed observation table (see working)
Background Concept
This part tests three anions and one cation using standard qualitative tests:
- Carbonate, : with acid it effervesces, giving , which turns limewater milky.
- Copper(II), : with it gives a pale blue precipitate of , which is insoluble in excess ; on warming, decomposes to black .
- Sulfate, : with it gives a white precipitate of , which is insoluble in acid.
- Hydrogen ion, : makes the solution acidic; it reacts with carbonate to give .
FA 8 is and FA 9 is .
Understanding the Question
You must carry out four tests on FA 8 and FA 9 and record your observations in Table 3.1. The tests probe for carbonate, copper(II), sulfate and acidity. Record observations at the correct stage (e.g., before/after warming, before/after adding acid).
Approach
Run each test on both solutions and record what you see. Use the standard tests: acid for carbonate (test gas with limewater), for cations (note colour, solubility in excess, effect of warming), for sulfate (then add acid to distinguish from ).
Step-by-Step Reasoning
Test 1 — add sulfuric acid:
- FA 8 (): effervescence as is released; the gas turns limewater milky.
- FA 9 (): already acidic, so no change; the solution stays blue.
Test 2 — add , then warm:
- FA 8: does not precipitate with and does not react with — no change; on warming, no gas.
- FA 9: — pale blue precipitate, insoluble in excess ; on warming, , so the precipitate turns black.
Test 3 — add / , then :
- FA 8: — white precipitate; on adding acid, dissolves with effervescence ().
- FA 9: — white precipitate; is insoluble in acid, so no change.
Test 4 — add FA 8 in excess (to FA 9):
- The in FA 9 reacts with from FA 8 — effervescence ().
- Then reacts with — pale blue precipitate of .
Key Takeaways
- : effervescence with acid; turns limewater milky.
- : pale blue precipitate with , insoluble in excess, turns black on warming.
- : white precipitate with , insoluble in acid.
- dissolves in acid with effervescence; does not.
Common Mistakes
- Confusing (acid-soluble, effervesces) with (acid-insoluble).
- Not recording the black colour of on warming.
- Saying dissolves in excess — it does not (unlike or ).
- Forgetting to test the gas with limewater in Test 1.
Things to Be Careful About
- Record each observation at the correct stage (before/after warming, before/after adding acid).
- Include gas tests (limewater) where relevant.
- Write "no change" where no visible change occurs — it is a valid observation.
- The mark scheme allows a rounded total: 16 available points cap at 7 marks.
Deduce the identity of the three ions listed in the Qualitative analysis notes that are present in FA 8 and FA 9. Suggest the identity of one other cation.
Give the formula of each ion.
If you cannot identify an ion write 'unknown'.
- FA 8 contains .............................. and .............................. .
- FA 9 contains .............................. and .............................. and .............................. .
Answer
- FA 8 contains unknown (sodium ion) and .
- FA 9 contains , and .
FA8: unknown (Na+) and CO3^2-; FA9: Cu2+, H+ and SO4^2-
Background Concept
Each observation in (b)(i) maps to a specific ion. Effervescence with acid indicates carbonate; a pale blue precipitate with that turns black on warming indicates copper(II); a white precipitate with that is insoluble in acid indicates sulfate; a solution that reacts with carbonate to release is acidic, indicating .
Understanding the Question
FA 8 contains one cation and one anion; FA 9 contains two cations and one anion. You must identify the three ions listed in the Qualitative analysis notes (carbonate, copper(II), sulfate) plus one other cation (hydrogen ion).
Approach
Work through the observations from (b)(i) and match each to the ion responsible.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- FA 8 + acid → effervescence, : carbonate, , present.
- FA 8 + → no precipitate: the cation is a Group 1 ion — call it unknown (sodium, ).
- FA 9 + → pale blue ppt, black on warming: copper(II), .
- FA 9 + → white ppt, insoluble in acid: sulfate, .
- FA 9 + → effervescence: the solution is acidic — hydrogen ion, .
So FA 8 is an unknown Group 1 carbonate (sodium carbonate), and FA 9 is copper(II) sulfate with sulfuric acid.
Key Takeaways
- Observations are evidence: each positive test identifies a specific ion.
- FA 9 has three ions — don't stop after finding copper(II).
Common Mistakes
- Writing "Na+" when the mark scheme accepts "unknown" — either is fine, but "unknown" is safer.
- Missing in FA 9 — the effervescence with carbonate in Test 4 is the clue.
- Giving FA 8 only one ion when it has two.
Things to Be Careful About
- FA 9 contains THREE ions: , and .
- FA 8 contains TWO: unknown (sodium) and .
- The mark scheme gives 2 marks for all correct, 1 mark for three correct.
Write an ionic equation for one reaction that occurred in Test 2 in Table 3.1. Include state symbols.
Answer
Cu2+(aq) + 2OH-(aq) → Cu(OH)2(s)
Background Concept
In Test 2, adding to FA 9 causes copper(II) ions to precipitate as copper(II) hydroxide. The ionic equation shows only the reacting species, with spectator ions (sodium and sulfate) omitted.
Understanding the Question
Write an ionic equation for one reaction that occurred in Test 2. The mark scheme accepts either the precipitation of or its decomposition to on warming.
Approach
Identify the reacting ions and balance both atoms and charge.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- reacts with to form .
- Balance: one needs two for charge and atom balance.
- Add state symbols: .
The alternative accepted equation is the thermal decomposition: .
Key Takeaways
- Ionic equations omit spectator ions.
- Both atoms and charge must balance.
- State symbols are essential.
Common Mistakes
- Missing state symbols — the mark scheme requires them.
- Writing the full equation with spectator ions (sodium, sulfate) — the question asks for ionic.
- Unbalanced charges (e.g., ).
Things to Be Careful About
- Use (aq) for aqueous ions and (s) for the precipitate.
- Either accepted equation scores — choose the precipitation one for simplicity.
