Chemistry 9701/41 — May/June 2013
Cambridge A-Level · A Level Structured Questions · worked solutions for every part, with the mark scheme
Topics Carboxylic Acids and Derivatives · Polymerisation · Electrochemistry · Equilibria · Reaction Kinetics · Transition Elements · +6 more
What is meant by the term standard electrode potential, SEP?
Answer
The potential of an electrode compared to that of a standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) (or the EMF of a cell composed of the test electrode and the SHE).
All measurement concentrations are and the temperature is (at pressure).
The potential of an electrode compared to a standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) under standard conditions ( concentrations, , ).
Background Concept
Electrode potentials are measured relative to a universal reference point. The standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) is assigned a standard electrode potential of exactly at all temperatures. To ensure that the measured potential is truly 'standard' and comparable across different half-cells, all species involved must be at standard states: solutes at , gases at (or ), and the temperature is conventionally ().
Understanding the Question
The question asks for the definition of 'standard electrode potential' (SEP) and awards 2 marks. This means two distinct pieces of information are required: the reference point (what it is compared to) and the standard conditions under which the measurement is made.
Approach
Recall the formal IUPAC definition of SEP. It is the electromotive force (EMF) of a cell where one electrode is the standard hydrogen electrode and the other is the electrode of interest, with all reactants and products at standard states. Break this into two clear points to match the 2-mark allocation.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Point 1 (1 mark): Define what the SEP is. It is the potential (or EMF of the cell) of a given electrode measured against the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE). The mark scheme accepts either 'potential of an electrode compared to SHE' or 'EMF of a cell composed of the test electrode and the SHE'.
- Point 2 (1 mark): State the standard conditions. The mark scheme requires both the concentration and temperature (and optionally pressure). 'All measurement concentrations of and / pressure'. Mentioning just 'standard conditions' is not specific enough; the actual values must be stated.
Key Takeaways
When defining any 'standard' thermodynamic or electrochemical quantity, always explicitly state the reference point and the numerical values of the standard conditions (concentration, temperature, pressure). Vague answers like 'standard conditions' will not score.
Common Mistakes
- Stating 'standard conditions' without giving the numerical values (, ).
- Forgetting to mention the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) as the reference.
- Confusing standard electrode potential with standard cell potential (which requires two half-cells).
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure you mention both concentration () and temperature (). Pressure () is often accepted as a bonus or alternative for the temperature point, but concentration and temperature are the critical ones for aqueous half-cells.
Draw a fully labelled diagram of the apparatus you could use to measure the SEP of the electrode.
See diagram for the fully labelled electrochemical cell setup.
Background Concept
To measure the standard electrode potential of a half-cell that does not involve a solid metal (like ), an inert electrode must be used to facilitate electron transfer. Platinum is the standard choice because it is unreactive and conducts electricity well. The half-cell is connected to a standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) to complete the circuit and allow the potential difference to be measured.
Understanding the Question
You are asked to draw and fully label the apparatus to measure the SEP of the electrode. This is a non-metal/metal-ion half-cell, so an inert platinum electrode is required. The diagram must show the complete cell setup including the SHE, the test half-cell, the connection between them, and the measuring device.
Approach
Recall the standard diagram for measuring an electrode potential. It consists of two half-cells connected by a salt bridge and a voltmeter. One half-cell is the SHE. The other is the test half-cell. Ensure all components are labelled according to the mark scheme criteria.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Hydrogen gas and delivery system (1 mark): The left side is the SHE. Draw a beaker with a platinum electrode, bubbling hydrogen gas () into the solution. Label the gas inlet.
- Test solution (1 mark): The right side is the half-cell. Draw a beaker containing the solution. Label it clearly.
- Platinum electrodes (1 mark): Both half-cells must have a platinum electrode. Label both as 'Pt'. For the half-cell, the electrode is inert and simply provides a surface for electron transfer.
- Salt bridge and voltmeter (1 mark): Draw a salt bridge (often a U-tube or filter paper strip) connecting the two solutions to maintain electrical neutrality. Draw a voltmeter (V) connecting the two electrodes to measure the potential difference.
- Acid in SHE (1 mark): The SHE contains an acid, typically or , providing the ions. Label the solution as '' or ''. Simply writing 'acid' is not sufficient; the specific ions or compounds must be named.
Key Takeaways
When drawing electrochemical cells for half-cells without a solid metal (like or ), always include an inert platinum electrode. The SHE diagram is a standard template that must be memorized.
Common Mistakes
- Using a metal electrode (like iron) for the half-cell. This would introduce the potential and ruin the measurement.
- Forgetting to label the acid in the SHE as specifically as required (e.g., just 'acid' instead of '').
- Omitting the salt bridge or voltmeter.
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure both electrodes are explicitly labelled as platinum (Pt).
- The salt bridge must connect the two solutions, not just the electrodes.
- The voltmeter should be clearly marked with a 'V'.
The reaction between ions and ions is an equilibrium reaction.
Use the Data Booklet to calculate the for this reaction.
Working
From the Data Booklet:
Answer
0.23 V
Background Concept
The standard cell potential () is calculated using the standard electrode potentials of the two half-cells involved. The formula is , where the cathode is where reduction occurs (higher/more positive ) and the anode is where oxidation occurs (lower/less positive ). Alternatively, you can write the half-equations, reverse the oxidation one and change its sign, then add the potentials.
Understanding the Question
You are given the overall redox equation and asked to calculate . You need to identify the two half-reactions, find their standard electrode potentials from the Data Booklet, and apply the correct formula.
Approach
- Identify the reduction half-reaction: is reduced to . .
- Identify the oxidation half-reaction: is oxidized to . The reduction potential for is .
- Calculate .
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Look up for : .
- Look up for : .
- Since is reduced and is oxidized, .
Key Takeaways
Always use the formula (reduction minus oxidation) to avoid sign errors. Do not multiply the values by the stoichiometric coefficients.
Common Mistakes
- Multiplying the electrode potential by the stoichiometric coefficient (e.g., using ). Electrode potentials are intensive properties and do not scale with amount.
- Subtracting in the wrong order (), which would incorrectly suggest the reaction is non-spontaneous.
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure you are using the correct values from the Data Booklet. The value for is , not to be confused with ().
Hence state, with a reason, whether there will be more products or more reactants at equilibrium.
Answer
Since is positive (), the forward reaction is favoured. Therefore, there will be more products than reactants at equilibrium.
More products, because E°cell is positive.
Background Concept
The relationship between the standard cell potential and the equilibrium constant is given by and . Combining these gives . A positive means is negative, which means . When , the equilibrium position lies to the right, meaning products are favoured over reactants.
Understanding the Question
You calculated in part (i). You need to use this value to deduce the position of equilibrium. The word 'hence' means you must base your answer directly on the positive value you just calculated.
Approach
A positive indicates a spontaneous forward reaction under standard conditions and a large value (). Therefore, at equilibrium, the concentration of products will be greater than that of reactants.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- State the reason: is positive ().
- State the conclusion: More products than reactants (or equilibrium lies to the right / forward reaction is favoured).
Key Takeaways
A positive always correlates with and products being favoured at equilibrium. A negative correlates with and reactants being favoured.
Common Mistakes
- Stating 'the reaction is spontaneous' without linking it to the equilibrium position. The question asks about the equilibrium position, not just spontaneity.
- Forgetting to give a reason. The mark scheme requires both the statement and the reason.
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure your reason directly references the value from part (i). 'Because ' is the required phrasing.
Write the expression for for this reaction, and state its units.
units ....................................................
Answer
units:
Kc = [Fe2+]^2[I2] / ([Fe3+]^2[I-]^2); units: mol^-1 dm^3
Background Concept
The equilibrium constant is the ratio of the concentrations of products to reactants, each raised to the power of their stoichiometric coefficients in the balanced equation. Pure solids and liquids are excluded, but aqueous ions and dissolved species (like ) are included. The units of are derived by substituting the units of concentration () into the expression and simplifying.
Understanding the Question
You need to write the expression for the given equilibrium and determine its units. The reaction is:
Approach
- Write the expression: products over reactants, raised to their coefficients.
- Substitute units: .
- Simplify the units.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Expression (1 mark): Numerator is . Denominator is . Ensure the powers match the stoichiometric coefficients (2, 1, 2, 2).
- Units (1 mark):
Numerator units:
Denominator units:
units =
Key Takeaways
Always raise concentrations to the power of their stoichiometric coefficients. When calculating units, treat as a single unit and simplify algebraically.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to square the concentrations of , , and .
- Writing as a solid or omitting it. It is aqueous () in this context.
- Incorrect unit simplification, e.g., writing instead of .
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme allows error carried forward (ecf) from an incorrect expression in (c)(iii) to the units calculation, but you must show the correct derivation for full marks. Ensure your unit calculation matches your expression.
An experiment was carried out using solutions of and of equal concentrations. of each solution were mixed together, and allowed to reach equilibrium.
The concentrations at equilibrium of and were as follows.
Use these data, together with the equation given in (c), to calculate the concentrations of and at equilibrium.
Answer
From the stoichiometry of the reaction:
For every of produced, of are produced. Since the initial concentrations of and were equal, and they react in a 1:1 molar ratio (), the amount of remaining equals the amount of remaining.
[Fe2+] = 0.02 mol dm^-3; [I-] = 2.0 x 10^-4 mol dm^-3
Background Concept
In a closed system where reactants are mixed in stoichiometric proportions (or in this case, equal initial concentrations reacting in a 1:1 ratio), the amounts of products formed and reactants remaining are linked by the stoichiometry of the balanced equation. This allows you to deduce unknown equilibrium concentrations without needing an ICE (Initial, Change, Equilibrium) table if the relationships are clear.
Understanding the Question
You are given that initial solutions of and had equal concentrations. When mixed in equal volumes ( each), their concentrations in the mixture are still equal. The reaction consumes them in a 2:2 (or 1:1) ratio. You are given equilibrium concentrations of and , and need to find and .
Approach
- Use the stoichiometry between and : for every 1 formed, 2 are formed. Since both start at 0, .
- Use the stoichiometry between and : they start at equal concentrations and react in a 1:1 ratio. Therefore, the amount remaining must be equal: .
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Calculate : The reaction produces and in a 2:1 ratio. Since both were initially 0, at equilibrium . Given , .
- Calculate : The reactants and start at equal concentrations and are consumed in a 2:2 (1:1) ratio. Therefore, whatever remains must be equal. Given , then .
Key Takeaways
When reactants are mixed in equal concentrations and react in a 1:1 ratio, their equilibrium concentrations will be equal. When products are formed from zero initial amounts, their equilibrium concentrations are linked by the product stoichiometric ratios.
Common Mistakes
- Trying to calculate the initial concentration and then using an ICE table unnecessarily. While valid, it's more error-prone and slower than using the direct stoichiometric relationships here.
- Forgetting the 2:1 ratio between and .
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure your units are correct ().
- The mark scheme explicitly states the relationships: '( must always be twice , so) ' and '( must always be equal to , so) '.
Calculate the for this reaction.
Working
Using the expression from (c)(iii) and the equilibrium concentrations:
Substitute the values:
Answer
2.5 x 10^9 mol^-1 dm^3
Background Concept
Once the equilibrium concentrations of all species are known, they can be substituted directly into the expression to calculate the equilibrium constant. This is a straightforward arithmetic calculation, but handling scientific notation and powers correctly is essential to avoid errors.
Understanding the Question
You have the expression from (c)(iii) and all four equilibrium concentrations from (c)(iv) and the question stem. You simply need to substitute and calculate.
Approach
- Write the expression.
- Substitute the values: , , , .
- Calculate the numerator and denominator separately.
- Divide and include units.
Step-by-Step Reasoning
- Numerator:
- Denominator:
- Division:
- Units: From (c)(iii), the units are .
Key Takeaways
Large values (like ) confirm the conclusion in part (ii) that products are heavily favoured at equilibrium. Always include units in your final answer for unless they cancel out to give a dimensionless quantity.
Common Mistakes
- Arithmetic errors with scientific notation, especially when squaring terms like .
- Forgetting to include the units in the final answer.
- Rounding errors: ensure you carry full precision through the calculation.
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme allows error carried forward (ecf) from an incorrect expression in (c)(iii) or incorrect concentrations in (c)(iv). If your expression or concentrations were wrong but your substitution and calculation were correct based on those wrong values, you can still earn the method and accuracy marks. However, for the correct answer, use the correct values.
- Significant figures: The data given has 2 significant figures (, ), so the answer should be given to 2 significant figures: .
The rest of this paper
7 more questions- Q2Reaction Kinetics9M
- Q3Transition Elements14M
- Q4Nitrogen Compounds · Organic Synthesis · Halogen Compounds · Carboxylic Acids and Derivatives15M
- Q5Hydroxy Compounds · Carboxylic Acids and Derivatives · Hydrocarbons17M
- Q6Polymerisation10M
- Q7Analytical Techniques10M
- Q8Polymerisation10M