Physics 5054/42 — May/June 2025
Cambridge O-Level · Alternative to Practical · worked solutions for every part, with the mark scheme
Topics Experimental Contexts · Observations and Measurements · Analysis, Conclusions and Evaluation · Use of Techniques, Apparatus and Materials · Planning Experiments and Investigations
A student investigates the refraction of a ray of light passing through a transparent block and determines the refractive index of the block.
The student's ray-trace sheet is shown full size in Fig. 1.1.
The outline of the transparent block is shown by the rectangle ABCD. A line SR that meets side AD of the block is also marked.
On Fig. 1.1, draw a normal to the block at the point R. Extend your normal 6 cm above side AD and below side BC.
Label the point where the normal crosses side BC of the block with the letter T.
Measure the angle between SR and the normal.
= ______
Answer
30
Walkthrough
The first task is to construct the normal at the point of incidence R. The normal is a line drawn perpendicular to the surface at the point where the ray meets it. Since side AD is horizontal, the normal at R is a vertical line. Extend this vertical line 6 cm above AD and below BC. Where it crosses the bottom side BC, label the point T.
Next, measure the angle between the incident ray SR and the normal RT. Using a protractor centred on R with the baseline along RT, the angle reads (accept to ).
Key Takeaways
- The normal is always drawn perpendicular to the surface at the point of incidence.
- Angles in optics are measured between the ray and the normal, not the surface.
Common Mistakes
- Drawing the normal to the side of the block rather than perpendicular to it.
- Measuring the angle between the ray and the surface of the block instead of the normal.
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure the protractor is correctly aligned with the normal RT.
- Read the angle to the nearest degree.
The student:
- positions an illuminated slit on the ray-trace sheet so that a ray of light passes along the line SR towards R
- marks with small crosses (x) two points on the ray that leaves side BC of the block
- removes the transparent block.
On Fig. 1.1, draw a straight line through the two crosses to meet side BC of the block.
Label the point where this line meets side BC with the letter E.
Label the other end of this line as F.
Draw a straight line from E to R.
This shows the path of the ray of light through the block.
Answer
See diagram
Walkthrough
A straight line is drawn through the two cross marks below side BC. This line represents the emergent ray. Extend it upwards until it meets side BC, and label this intersection point E. Extend the line further to the left and label the other end F.
Finally, draw a straight line connecting E to R. This line ER represents the path of the light ray inside the transparent block.
Key Takeaways
- The emergent ray is found by drawing a straight line through the two points marked on its path.
- The path inside the block connects the entry point R to the exit point E.
Common Mistakes
- Drawing a curved line instead of a straight line for the ray paths.
- Forgetting to label points E and F.
Things to Be Careful About
- Use a sharp pencil and a ruler for straight lines.
- Ensure the line through the crosses is extended accurately to meet BC.
Answer
2.3
Walkthrough
Use a ruler to measure the length of line ET, which is the horizontal distance from the normal RT to the exit point E along side BC. Read the measurement to the nearest millimetre (0.1 cm). The value is (accept to ).
Key Takeaways
- Lengths on ray-trace sheets are measured directly with a ruler.
- Readings should be taken to the precision of the instrument, which is for a standard ruler.
Common Mistakes
- Not reading to the nearest millimetre.
- Measuring from the wrong end of the line.
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure the ruler is aligned exactly along the line ET.
- Record the value with one decimal place (e.g., , not unless the scale demands it, but here is the precision).
Answer
6.4
Walkthrough
Use a ruler to measure the length of line ER, which is the path of the ray inside the block. Read the measurement to the nearest millimetre. The value is (accept to ).
Key Takeaways
- The hypotenuse of the triangle formed by the ray path and the normal is measured directly.
Common Mistakes
- Measuring the horizontal or vertical component instead of the hypotenuse ER.
Things to Be Careful About
- Align the ruler carefully along the line from E to R.
On Fig. 1.1, extend the line FE into the block, until it meets the line RT.
Label the point where FE meets RT with the letter G.
Measure the length of line EG on Fig. 1.1.
= ______
Answer
Extend line FE upwards to meet the normal RT at point G. Measure EG.
(candidate's measurement to nearest mm)
2.7
Walkthrough
Using a ruler, extend the line FE (the emergent ray) upwards into the block until it intersects the normal line RT. Label this intersection point G. Measure the length of line EG with a ruler to the nearest millimetre. Based on the geometry ( and ), , so a reading of is expected (accept any reasonable reading to the nearest mm).
Key Takeaways
- Extending the emergent ray backwards allows the construction of a right-angled triangle to find the refractive index using a different method.
Common Mistakes
- Not extending the line accurately to meet RT.
- Forgetting to label point G.
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure the line is extended straight and meets RT exactly.
Use your values from (c)(i) and (c)(ii) to calculate a first value for the refractive index of the block.
Use the equation shown.
= ______
Working
Answer
1.4
Walkthrough
Substitute the measured values and into the given equation .
Round to 2 significant figures to get (accept values in the range to depending on measurement precision).
Key Takeaways
- The refractive index can be calculated from geometric lengths on the ray-trace sheet.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to multiply by 2 in the denominator.
- Arithmetic errors in the division.
Things to Be Careful About
- Use the exact measured values, not rounded intermediate values if possible.
Use your values from (c)(ii) and (d) to calculate a second value for the refractive index of the block.
Use the equation shown.
= ______
Working
(Note: Using the geometrically expected value gives )
Answer
(from candidate's values)
2.4
Walkthrough
Substitute the measured values and (or the candidate's measured value) into the equation .
The mark scheme awards the mark for a correct calculation from the candidate's values. Using the exact geometric value gives .
Key Takeaways
- A second method for calculating the refractive index is provided by extending the emergent ray.
Common Mistakes
- Using the wrong values for and .
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure the calculation uses the candidate's own measured value for .
Two quantities can be considered to be the same within the limits of experimental accuracy if their values are within 10% of each other.
Compare your value for the refractive index calculated in (e)(i) with the value calculated in (e)(ii).
State if your two values can be considered to be the same.
Support your statement with a calculation.
calculation
statement ______
Working
Percentage difference:
Answer
calculation:
statement: The values are not the same (difference is greater than 10%)
Not the same; percentage difference is ~71%
Walkthrough
The question states that two quantities are the same within experimental accuracy if they are within 10% of each other. Calculate the percentage difference between and .
Using and :
Since , the two values cannot be considered the same.
Key Takeaways
- Experimental accuracy can be assessed by comparing percentage differences between repeated measurements or different methods.
Common Mistakes
- Calculating the percentage difference incorrectly (e.g., dividing by the sum instead of one value).
- Concluding the values are the same when the difference is large.
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme accepts any reasonable calculation justifying the statement. Use the candidate's own values for and .
One source of inaccuracy in this experiment is careless measurement.
Suggest another source of inaccuracy in this experiment.
Answer
- The thickness of the light rays / difficulty in aligning the incident ray exactly with SR
- Difficulty of placing the cross marks accurately
- The block may not be perfectly rectangular or its sides may not be parallel
Difficulty in aligning the incident ray with SR
Walkthrough
The question asks for a source of inaccuracy other than careless measurement. In ray-tracing experiments, common sources of error include:
- The light source (slit) produces rays with some thickness, making it difficult to align the incident ray exactly with the drawn line SR.
- The cross marks used to define the emergent ray have a finite size, making it difficult to place them accurately on the exact path of the ray.
- The transparent block may not be perfectly rectangular, or the sides AD and BC may not be perfectly parallel.
Any one of these is acceptable.
Key Takeaways
- Practical experiments have inherent limitations that affect accuracy.
- Identifying these limitations helps in suggesting improvements.
Common Mistakes
- Giving vague answers like "human error" or "be more careful".
- Repeating the source of error already given in the question (careless measurement).
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure the suggested error is specific to the experimental method (ray-tracing with a transparent block).
A student investigates the resistance of a thermistor at different temperatures.
The student constructs the circuit shown in Fig. 2.1.
The thermistor shown in Fig. 2.1 is placed in an empty beaker and is at room temperature.
The student measures the room temperature .
The thermometer is shown in Fig. 2.2.
Record the reading of on the answer line.
= ______
Answer
21.0
Walkthrough
The thermometer scale in Fig. 2.2 runs from 10 to 30 °C with major markings every 10 °C and minor markings every 1 °C. The top of the liquid column aligns exactly with the first minor mark above 20 °C. Reading to the precision of the scale gives 21 °C. A trailing zero (21.0) is often used to indicate the precision of the instrument, though 21 is also acceptable.
Key Takeaways
When reading a printed thermometer or ruler in Paper 4, always read to the smallest division shown on the scale. A trailing zero (e.g., 21.0) correctly communicates that the measurement is precise to the nearest 1 °C.
Common Mistakes
Reading the scale from the wrong direction or miscounting the minor divisions. Writing '21' without a trailing zero is generally accepted, but '21.0' is safer to show awareness of precision.
Things to Be Careful About
Ensure you are reading the top of the liquid column (meniscus) for liquid-in-glass thermometers. The scale here is linear and straightforward, but always verify which way the numbers increase.
The student:
- closes the switch
- records the potential difference across the thermistor while the thermistor is at room temperature in the top row of Table 2.1
- opens the switch.
The voltmeter is shown in Fig. 2.3.
Record the potential difference while the thermistor is at room temperature in Table 2.1.
Table 2.1
| thermistor at room temperature | ______ | 1.4 | ______ |
| thermistor at temperature of hot water | 1.2 | 3.3 | ______ |
Answer
3.1
Walkthrough
The voltmeter dial in Fig. 2.3 has a range of 0 to 5 V. The major numbered divisions are at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 V. Between each major division, there are 10 small subdivisions, meaning each small division represents . The pointer is exactly one small division past the 3 V mark. Reading to the precision of the smallest division gives .
Key Takeaways
Always determine the value of the smallest division on an analogue dial before reading. For a 0–5 V scale with 10 subdivisions per volt, each subdivision is 0.1 V.
Common Mistakes
Reading the pointer position incorrectly or assuming each subdivision is 0.2 V or 0.5 V. Forgetting to include the unit (V) in the final answer if the question requires it, though here it is already in the table heading.
Things to Be Careful About
Ensure your eye is directly in line with the pointer to avoid parallax error, even when reading a printed diagram. The pointer here is drawn clearly at 3.1 V.
The student:
- disconnects the voltmeter from points X and Y
- reconnects the voltmeter across the 220 resistor between points Y and Z
- closes the switch and records the potential difference across the 220 resistor while the thermistor is at room temperature in the top row of Table 2.1.
Re-draw the circuit shown in Fig. 2.1 on page 5 to show the voltmeter connected to measure the potential difference across the 220 resistor.
Answer
Voltmeter connected in parallel across the 220 Ω resistor between points Y and Z
Walkthrough
A voltmeter must always be connected in parallel with the component across which the potential difference is to be measured. To measure , the voltmeter must be connected between points Y and Z, in parallel with the resistor. The rest of the circuit (power source, switch, thermistor between X and Y, and the resistor between Y and Z) remains unchanged.
Key Takeaways
Voltmeters are connected in parallel; ammeters are connected in series. When repositioning a voltmeter, only move its two connecting wires to the new component.
Common Mistakes
Connecting the voltmeter in series with the resistor, which would disrupt the circuit and give an incorrect reading. Connecting the voltmeter across the power source or the switch.
Things to Be Careful About
Ensure the new connections are clearly drawn and do not cross over other wires ambiguously. Label the new connection points Y and Z if helpful, though the original labels are sufficient.
The student:
- pours some hot water into the beaker containing the thermistor
- places the thermometer into the hot water and stirs the water gently
- waits for 30 s
- measures the temperature of the hot water
- measures new values for potential differences and while the thermistor is at the temperature of the hot water .
The temperature of the hot water is .
The student's measurements are recorded in the bottom row of Table 2.1.
Explain why the student waits for 30 s before measuring the temperature of the hot water.
Answer
To allow the thermometric liquid time to expand and reach the maximum temperature, ensuring the temperature has stopped rising before it is recorded.
To measure the highest temperature reached / to allow the liquid to expand
Walkthrough
When hot water is poured into the beaker, the thermistor and the surrounding air inside the beaker are cooler than the water. Heat transfers from the water to the thermometer and the thermistor. Waiting for 30 seconds allows the thermometric liquid inside the thermometer to absorb heat, expand, and reach thermal equilibrium with the hot water. It also ensures that the water itself has reached its maximum temperature and is not still rising due to residual heat from the pouring process.
Key Takeaways
In temperature measurement experiments, waiting allows the system to reach thermal equilibrium. The recorded temperature should be the maximum temperature reached by the liquid.
Common Mistakes
Saying 'to make the water hotter' or 'to let it cool down'. The goal is to measure the true maximum temperature of the hot water, not to change it.
Things to Be Careful About
Acceptable answers focus on allowing time for expansion, reaching the maximum temperature, or ensuring the temperature has stopped rising. Avoid vague answers like 'to be accurate'.
Explain why the student stirs the water before reading the temperature of the hot water from the thermometer.
Answer
To ensure that the water is at a uniform temperature throughout the beaker.
To ensure uniform temperature
Walkthrough
Hot water can develop temperature gradients, with hotter water rising to the top and cooler water sinking to the bottom. Stirring the water mixes it, ensuring that the temperature is the same everywhere in the beaker. This means the thermometer and the thermistor will both experience the same temperature, giving a consistent and representative reading.
Key Takeaways
Stirring promotes convection and ensures a uniform temperature distribution in a liquid, which is essential for accurate and consistent measurements.
Common Mistakes
Saying 'to mix the water' without explaining why. The key point is uniformity of temperature.
Things to Be Careful About
The explanation must explicitly mention 'uniform temperature'. Simply saying 'to mix' is not sufficient for the mark.
Examine the data in Table 2.1.
Compare the reading for the potential difference across the thermistor at room temperature with the reading for the potential difference across the thermistor at the temperature of the hot water .
Suggest what causes the difference in the readings.
Answer
The potential difference across the thermistor decreases from 3.1 V at room temperature to 1.2 V at the higher temperature. Since the current in the series circuit increases (as shown by the higher ), the resistance of the thermistor must decrease. The resistance of the thermistor decreases as temperature increases.
The resistance of the thermistor decreases
Walkthrough
In the series circuit, the total potential difference from the power source is constant. The sum of the potential differences across the thermistor () and the resistor () equals the supply voltage. At room temperature, and . At the higher temperature, and . The decrease in and the increase in indicate that the current in the circuit has increased. By Ohm's law (), if the potential difference across a component decreases while the current through it increases, its resistance must have decreased. This is the characteristic behavior of an NTC (Negative Temperature Coefficient) thermistor.
Key Takeaways
In a series circuit with a constant supply voltage, a decrease in potential difference across one component (and a corresponding increase across another) indicates a decrease in resistance of the first component, assuming the current has increased.
Common Mistakes
Saying 'the voltage decreases so the resistance decreases' without mentioning current. Resistance is not simply proportional to voltage; it depends on both voltage and current (). You must consider the change in current as well.
Things to Be Careful About
Ensure you state that the resistance of the thermistor decreases, not just the potential difference. The question asks for the cause of the difference in readings, which is the change in resistance due to temperature.
The current in the circuit is calculated using the equation:
where .
Use the measurements recorded in Table 2.1 to calculate the current at room temperature and at the temperature of the hot water .
Record your answers in Table 2.1.
Working
At room temperature :
At the temperature of hot water :
Answer
| thermistor at room temperature | 3.1 | 1.4 | 0.00636 |
| thermistor at temperature of hot water | 1.2 | 3.3 | 0.015 |
0.00636 A and 0.015 A
Walkthrough
The current is the same everywhere in a series circuit. The resistor is a standard resistor with a known resistance, so the current can be calculated using the potential difference across it () and Ohm's law: .
For room temperature:
For hot water temperature:
These values are recorded in the column of Table 2.1.
Key Takeaways
In a series circuit, the current is uniform. Using a known resistor and its potential difference allows you to calculate the circuit current, which is then used to find the resistance of an unknown component.
Common Mistakes
Using the wrong potential difference (e.g., using instead of ) in the calculation. Forgetting to divide by 220, or using the wrong unit for resistance.
Things to Be Careful About
Give your answers to 2 or 3 significant figures. 0.00636 A is appropriate; 0.0064 A may also be accepted depending on the scheme's tolerance, but 0.00636 is more precise. 0.015 A is exact to 2 significant figures.
The resistance of the thermistor is calculated using the equation:
Use the data in Table 2.1 on page 6 to calculate at room temperature and at the temperature of the hot water .
at room temperature = ______
at temperature of hot water = ______
Working
At room temperature :
At the temperature of hot water :
Answer
at room temperature = 487 (any answer between 480 and 520 is acceptable)
at temperature of hot water = 80
487 Ω and 80 Ω
Walkthrough
The resistance of the thermistor is found using Ohm's law rearranged as , where is the potential difference across the thermistor and is the current calculated in part (e).
For room temperature:
Rounding to 3 significant figures gives 487 . The mark scheme accepts a range from 480 to 520 to allow for rounding differences in the current calculation (e.g., if a student used 0.0064 A, they would get ).
For hot water temperature:
Key Takeaways
The resistance of a component can be calculated from the potential difference across it and the current through it. For a thermistor, this resistance will change significantly with temperature.
Common Mistakes
Using the wrong potential difference (e.g., instead of ). Forgetting to use the current calculated in part (e) and instead trying to calculate resistance from the total voltage and total resistance.
Things to Be Careful About
Pay attention to the range of acceptable answers for the room temperature resistance. If you used a rounded value for the current (e.g., 0.006 A), your resistance will be off. Use at least 3 significant figures for intermediate calculations to avoid rounding errors.
Calculate , the average change in the resistance of the thermistor per degree Celsius, for the thermistor as the temperature of the thermistor rises from room temperature to the temperature of the hot water .
Use the equation shown.
Give your answer to 2 significant figures.
= ______
Working
Change in resistance of thermistor:
Change in temperature:
Average change in resistance per degree Celsius ():
Rounding to 2 significant figures:
Answer
6.6
Walkthrough
The question asks for the average change in resistance per degree Celsius, . This is calculated as the total change in resistance divided by the total change in temperature.
Change in resistance:
(Note: Using the unrounded value 487.4 gives )
Change in temperature:
Calculate :
The question specifically asks for the answer to 2 significant figures. Rounding 6.5645... to 2 significant figures gives 6.6.
Key Takeaways
When calculating a rate of change (like ), always find the difference in the dependent variable and divide by the difference in the independent variable. Pay close attention to the required number of significant figures in the final answer.
Common Mistakes
Forgetting to calculate the change in resistance and temperature, and instead dividing the final resistance by the final temperature. Failing to round to 2 significant figures as explicitly requested.
Things to Be Careful About
The mark scheme awards one mark for the correct substitution and one mark for the final answer to 2 significant figures. If you use 480 or 520 for the room temperature resistance, your final answer will be slightly different (e.g., or ), but the scheme typically allows a range. Stick to your calculated value of 487 for consistency. Ensure your final answer is exactly 2 significant figures: 6.6, not 6.56 or 7.
A student investigates the stretching of a spring.
The student suspends the spring from the clamp of a retort stand as shown in Fig. 3.1.
The student takes readings from the metre rule to determine the length of the spring.
On Fig. 3.2, take readings from the metre rule level with the top of the spring and level with the bottom of the spring.
Do not include the loops at the top and the bottom of the spring in your measurements.
Record your readings to the nearest 0.1 cm.
reading level with top of spring = ______
reading level with bottom of spring = ______
Answer
reading level with top of spring =
reading level with bottom of spring =
top: 39.0 cm, bottom: 41.1 cm
Walkthrough
- Locate the top of the coiled part of the spring (ignoring the top suspension loop as instructed). Look horizontally across to the metre rule scale. The line aligns exactly with the mark for .
- Locate the bottom of the coiled part of the spring (ignoring the bottom loop). Looking horizontally across to the rule, the line aligns one millimetre division below , which corresponds to .
- Record both values to the nearest , including the trailing zero for to indicate the scale's precision.
Key Takeaways
- When taking readings from an instrument with millimetre markings, always write the value to the nearest .
- Trailing zeros (like ) must not be omitted because they indicate the precision of the measurement.
Common Mistakes
- Including the loops at the top or bottom rather than measuring only the coiled section.
- Omitting the on and writing just .
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure you follow the scale direction carefully (the numbers increase downwards in this set-up: , , ).
Draw on Fig. 3.2 to show how the student uses a set-square to take a reading from the metre rule level with the bottom of the spring.
Answer
A set-square drawn with one straight edge horizontal and aligned with the bottom of the coiled part of the spring, and the perpendicular vertical edge flush against the metre rule.
Set-square drawn with right angle against the rule and horizontal edge aligned with bottom of spring coil
Walkthrough
To eliminate line-of-sight (parallax) errors when transferring a level from a suspended object to a vertical metre rule:
- Place one edge of a set-square flush against the vertical metre rule.
- Slide the set-square up or down until its perpendicular horizontal edge aligns precisely with the reference point (the bottom of the coiled section of the spring).
- The reading on the rule is then taken where the horizontal edge meets the scale.
Key Takeaways
- A set-square ensures that the line extending from the spring to the ruler is exactly at (perpendicular) to the scale, eliminating parallax error.
Common Mistakes
- Drawing the set-square tilted or not resting flat against the rule.
- Aligning to the bottom of the loop instead of the bottom of the coils.
Things to Be Careful About
- The right-angle corner of the set-square must touch the rule so that the edge extending to the spring is perfectly horizontal.
Calculate the length of the coiled part of the spring. Use the equation shown.
Show your working.
Record in Table 3.1 on page 12 for a load .
Working
Answer
(recorded in Table 3.1 under )
2.1 cm
Walkthrough
- Use the formula given:
- Substitute the values found in part (a)(i):
- Record (or ) in the first empty cell of Table 3.1 under load .
Key Takeaways
- The initial length (unstretched length ) of the coil is found by finding the difference between the two end markers.
Common Mistakes
- Subtracting in reverse giving a negative number.
- Rounding incorrectly or losing decimal precision.
Things to Be Careful About
- Match the decimal precision of the readings ( decimal place).
The student:
- places a load on the spring
- takes readings to determine the new length of the spring.
The top of the spring does not move but the bottom of the spring moves downwards.
The student determines that the new reading on the rule level with the bottom of spring is 45.2 cm.
Calculate the new length of the spring.
Record your answer for the new length for a load in Table 3.1 on page 12.
Working
Answer
(recorded in Table 3.1 under )
6.2 cm
Walkthrough
- The question states that the top reading does not move, so it remains at .
- The new bottom reading is .
- The new length is:
- Enter into Table 3.1 under .
Key Takeaways
- The stretched length is the distance between the fixed top of the coil and the new lower position of the bottom of the coil.
Common Mistakes
- Subtracting the original unstretched length () from instead of subtracting the top reading ().
Things to Be Careful About
- Keep units and decimal places consistent with the rest of the table ( decimal place).
The student repeats the procedure in (b)(ii) for loads , , and . The results are shown in Table 3.1.
Table 3.1
| 0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ______ | ______ | 10.0 | 14.0 | 18.2 | 21.9 |
On the grid provided in Fig. 3.3 on page 13, plot a graph of on the -axis against on the -axis.
Start from the origin (0, 0).
Draw the straight line of best fit.
Answer
- Axes and Labels:
- Horizontal axis: (or ), scaled from to at least (e.g. ).
- Vertical axis: (or ), scaled from to at least (e.g. or ).
- Scales: Linear, sensible, non-awkward intervals occupying more than half the grid.
- Plotting: All 6 points from Table 3.1 plotted accurately to within half a small square:
- Line of best fit: A single, thin, clear straight line drawn with a ruler passing evenly through the points.
Graph plotted with correctly labelled axes, linear scales, accurate points, and a straight line of best fit
Walkthrough
- Axes setup:
- The question specifies on the -axis and on the -axis.
- Label the -axis: .
- Label the -axis: .
- Choosing scales:
- Must start from the origin as instructed.
- -axis range is to . A convenient scale is (or ).
- -axis range is to (up to ). A convenient scale is or , ensuring the plot covers more than half the grid area.
- Plotting the points:
- Plot each of the pairs: , , , , , using neat small crosses ( or ) or encircled dots within small square.
- Line of best fit:
- Use a transparent ruler to draw a straight line that balances the points on either side. Note that this line has a -intercept around and does NOT pass through .
Key Takeaways
- In physics graph plotting, axes must be labelled with quantity and unit in the format .
- Scales must be linear (e.g. steps of ) and never awkward multiples like or .
- A best-fit line represents the underlying trend; do not join points dot-to-dot.
Common Mistakes
- Forcing the line of best fit to go through when the -intercept is the unstretched length .
- Inverting the axes ( on instead of ).
- Drawing a thick, fuzzy, or multiple-stroke line.
Things to Be Careful About
- The plotted points must cover more than half the available grid area in both directions.
Use the data in Table 3.1 and the graph in Fig. 3.3 to determine the extension of the spring when a load of 3.5 N is added to the spring.
Show your working.
extension = ______
Working
From the graph at :
Unstretched length of spring ():
(Values in the range to depending on candidate's line of best fit)
Answer
13.9 cm
Walkthrough
- Locate on the horizontal axis of Fig. 3.3.
- Project vertically upwards to intersect your line of best fit, then horizontally across to read the corresponding total length . From the best-fit line, (or ).
- Recall that extension is the increase in length beyond the unstretched length:
- Subtract the initial length :
Key Takeaways
- Extension is , not the total length .
- To use a graph for interpolation, read off from the line of best fit, not by averaging adjacent raw data points.
Common Mistakes
- Quoting the total length as the extension without subtracting the unstretched length .
Things to Be Careful About
- Show clear working so method marks are secured even if your graph read-off varies slightly.
A student suggests that the stretched length of the spring is proportional to load .
State if the data in Table 3.1 supports this suggestion. Justify your statement using the data in Table 3.1 or the graph in Fig. 3.3.
statement ______
justification ______
Answer
statement: No
justification: The graph of against does not pass through the origin (or the ratio is not constant / doubling does not double ).
statement: No; justification: The graph does not pass through the origin (the ratio l/L is not constant)
Walkthrough
- For two quantities to be directly proportional, their graph must be a straight line that passes through the origin , and the ratio of the quantities () must be constant.
- The graph of length against load has a non-zero -intercept ( at ). It does not pass through .
- Furthermore, testing values from Table 3.1:
- For , , ratio .
- For , , ratio .
Since the ratio is not constant and doubling the load does not double the length, is not proportional to .
(Note: It is the extension that is directly proportional to load, not the total length .)
Key Takeaways
- Direct proportionality requires two conditions: a straight line and passing through .
- If a linear graph has an intercept on the vertical axis, the relationship is linear, but not directly proportional.
Common Mistakes
- Stating 'Yes' because the graph is a straight line, forgetting that it must also pass through the origin.
- Confusing length with extension.
Things to Be Careful About
- The question specifically asks about the stretched length , not the extension.
Line of sight (parallax) errors can occur when readings are taken from the metre rule.
State one practical technique, other than using a set square, that ensures accurate readings are taken from a metre rule.
Answer
View the reading with the line of sight perpendicular () to the metre rule (or place the metre rule close to and parallel to the spring).
View the scale at eye level perpendicular (at 90 degrees) to the rule
Walkthrough
Parallax error occurs when an observer views a scale from an angle, causing the measured object to appear shifted relative to the markings.
To avoid or reduce parallax error without using a set-square, a student can:
- Ensure their line of sight is at eye level and perpendicular () to the rule when taking the reading.
- Position the metre rule as close as possible to the spring so there is minimal gap between the object and the scale.
Key Takeaways
- To prevent parallax errors, the line of sight must always be perpendicular to the scale.
- Reducing the physical distance between the scale and the measured object minimizes perspective shift.
Common Mistakes
- Giving vague answers such as 'look carefully' or 'use a magnifying glass'.
- Mentioning a set-square when the question specifically excluded it ('other than using a set square').
Things to Be Careful About
- State the condition clearly: 'perpendicular', 'at ', or 'at eye level'.
The student repeats the procedure described in (c) two more times and averages the readings before calculating the spring lengths for each load .
Explain why the student does this.
Answer
To reduce the effect of random errors (or to improve the reliability / precision of the results).
To reduce the effect of random errors and improve precision
Walkthrough
- In any experiment involving manual measurements, random errors (e.g. slight variations in aligning the rule, reading the meniscus, or minor oscillations of the spring) occur in both positive and negative directions.
- Repeating measurements and calculating a mean (average):
- Causes random variations above and below the true value to cancel each other out.
- Identifies anomalous readings so they can be discarded.
- Improves the reliability and precision of the calculated lengths.
Key Takeaways
- Repeating and averaging reduces the effect of random errors (it does not eliminate systematic errors or zero errors).
- It improves precision and reliability.
Common Mistakes
- Saying 'to eliminate all errors' or 'to avoid systematic errors' (systematic errors cannot be removed by averaging).
- Writing vague statements like 'to get the exact answer' or 'to make it correct'.
Things to Be Careful About
- Use precise scientific terms: 'reduce the effect of random errors' or 'improve precision/reliability'.
As a metal ball falls through a liquid, it experiences a frictional force from the liquid that opposes the motion of the metal ball.
Plan an experiment to determine the relationship between the density of a liquid contained in a measuring cylinder and the average speed of a metal ball falling through the liquid from the surface of the liquid to the bottom of the cylinder.
The average speed of the ball is calculated using the equation:
The arrangement of the apparatus is shown in Fig. 4.1.
The apparatus available includes:
- a measuring cylinder
- a metal ball
- a selection of different liquids whose densities are known.
You may also use any other apparatus commonly found in a school laboratory.
In your plan, include:
- any other apparatus needed
- a brief description of the method, including what you will measure and how you make sure that your measurements are accurate
- the variables you will control
- a results table to record your measurements (you are not required to enter any readings in the table)
- how you will process your results to draw a conclusion.
Answer
Additional apparatus needed:
- ruler (or measuring tape)
- stopwatch (or digital timer)
Method:
- Measure the height (distance) of the liquid in the measuring cylinder using the ruler.
- Drop the metal ball from rest at the surface of the liquid.
- Use the stopwatch to measure the time taken for the ball to fall to the bottom.
- Calculate the average speed using .
- Repeat the experiment for each of the other liquids with different known densities.
Control variables:
- Keep the height (or volume) of the liquid the same for all trials.
- Use the same metal ball (same mass, volume, and shape) for all trials.
Results table:
| Density of liquid / | Time taken / s | Average speed / |
|---|---|---|
Processing results and conclusion:
- Calculate the average speed for each liquid from the measured time and distance.
- Plot a graph of density of liquid (x-axis) against average speed (y-axis).
- Draw a line of best fit and observe whether the graph is horizontal (no effect) or has a gradient (density affects speed). Alternatively, compare the calculated average speeds for different densities to see if there is a clear relationship.
See working
Walkthrough
1. Additional apparatus:
The experiment requires measuring two quantities: the distance the ball falls and the time it takes. The distance is the height of the liquid in the measuring cylinder, which requires a ruler or measuring tape. The time requires a stopwatch or digital timer.
2. Method:
The candidate must describe the physical actions. First, measure the liquid height with the ruler. Then, drop the ball from rest at the surface and start the stopwatch simultaneously. Stop the timer when the ball reaches the bottom. Calculate the speed using the given formula. Finally, the method must include repeating the procedure for each of the different liquids to gather a range of data points.
3. Control variables:
To ensure that only the density of the liquid affects the ball's speed, all other factors must be kept constant. The height of the liquid must be the same for every trial so the distance is constant. The metal ball must be the same each time, meaning its mass, volume, and shape are unchanged. Changing the ball would change its mass and surface area, altering the frictional and gravitational forces.
4. Results table:
The table must record the independent variable (density of the liquid), the raw measured dependent variable (time taken), and the calculated derived variable (average speed). Crucially, units must be included in the column headings (e.g., , s, ). Blank rows are provided for the candidate to fill in their readings.
5. Processing and conclusion:
After calculating the average speed for each trial, the standard way to analyse the relationship between two variables is to plot a graph of density against average speed. Drawing a line of best fit allows the candidate to see the trend: a horizontal line means density has no effect, while a sloped line indicates a relationship. Alternatively, simply comparing the numerical values of the average speeds for different densities to identify a trend is an acceptable conclusion method.
Key Takeaways
- A planning question requires a structured response covering apparatus, method, control variables, a results table, and data processing.
- The results table must include units in the column headings; this is a separate mark.
- Control variables must be specific to the experiment. "Same apparatus" is too vague; specify "same ball" and "same liquid height".
- Data processing should involve either plotting a graph or explicitly comparing calculated values to draw a conclusion about the relationship.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting units in the table: The mark scheme awards a mark specifically for units in the table headings. Writing just "Time" and "Density" without units loses the mark.
- Vague control variables: Writing "keep the same conditions" or "use the same cylinder" does not score. The candidate must specify what is kept the same (e.g., liquid height, ball mass/shape).
- Missing the repeat for other liquids: The method must explicitly state that the procedure is repeated for the different liquids, not just that the ball is timed once.
- Confusing independent and dependent variables: Density is the independent variable (it is chosen/known), time is the raw dependent variable (measured), and speed is the derived dependent variable (calculated). The table and graph should reflect this.
Things to Be Careful About
- Precision of apparatus: A standard school ruler is precise to , and a stopwatch to . The method should imply reading to the appropriate precision (e.g., reading the meniscus at eye level if measuring liquid volume, though here we measure height from the top/bottom markings).
- Zero errors: If using a digital stopwatch, ensure it is reset to zero before each timing. If using a ruler, check for a zero error at the bottom of the cylinder.
- Repeatability: While the mark scheme focuses on repeating for different liquids, mentioning taking repeats for the same liquid and averaging the time is a good practice that demonstrates an understanding of accuracy, even if not explicitly marked here.







