Physics 5054/31 — October/November 2024
Cambridge O-Level · Practical Test · worked solutions for every part, with the mark scheme
Topics Observations and Measurements · Analysis, Conclusions and Evaluation · Use of Techniques, Apparatus and Materials · Experimental Contexts · Planning Experiments and Investigations
In this experiment, you will measure the volume of a straw by two different methods.
You are provided with:
- two identical round straws
- two set squares
- a 30 cm ruler
- a 50 measuring cylinder
- scissors
- paper towels to mop up any spillage.
A container of water is available for you to use.
Method 1
Measure and record the length of one of the straws. Give your answer to the nearest 0.1 cm.
= ______
Answer
= 20.0 cm (candidate-dependent reading to nearest 0.1 cm)
20.0 cm
Walkthrough
The candidate is asked to measure the length of a straw using a 30 cm ruler. The mark scheme requires the reading to be given to the nearest 0.1 cm. A typical straw length is around 20 cm, so a reading of 20.0 cm is realistic.
Key Takeaways
When measuring with a ruler, always record to the precision of the smallest division. If the smallest division is 1 mm (0.1 cm), record one decimal place.
Common Mistakes
Forgetting the trailing zero (e.g. writing 20 cm instead of 20.0 cm) or reading to the wrong precision (e.g. 20.05 cm).
Things to Be Careful About
Always read the ruler from the zero mark or subtract the starting position. Ensure the eye is directly above the marking to avoid parallax error. The value must be within ±0.2 cm of the supervisor's actual measurement.
Cut one of the straws into 5 pieces that are approximately equal in length.
Line up the pieces of straw as shown in Fig. 1.1.
Ensure the pieces of straw are touching.
Length is the width of the 5 pieces of straw placed side by side.
Measure and record the length for your 5 pieces of straw.
= ______
Answer
= 3.0 cm (candidate-dependent reading to nearest 0.1 cm)
3.0 cm
Walkthrough
Five pieces of straw are lined up side by side. The total width is measured. A typical straw diameter is about 0.6 cm, so five pieces would be about 3.0 cm wide.
Key Takeaways
When measuring the combined width of multiple identical small objects, the total width is larger and easier to measure accurately than a single object's width, reducing percentage error.
Common Mistakes
Reading the scale incorrectly or not lining the pieces up tightly together.
Things to Be Careful About
The pieces must be touching and aligned straight. Read to the nearest 0.1 cm. Ensure the ruler is parallel to the line of straws.
Working
Answer
= 0.60 cm
0.60 cm
Walkthrough
The diameter of one straw is found by dividing the total width of 5 straws by 5. Using the representative value cm, cm.
Key Takeaways
Averaging over multiple identical objects (here, dividing by 5) gives a more accurate measurement of a single object's dimension than measuring one object directly.
Common Mistakes
Dividing by the wrong number or forgetting to use the candidate's own value from (a)(ii).
Things to Be Careful About
Carry forward the candidate's value from (a)(ii). The answer should have an appropriate number of significant figures (2 or 3).
Some of the apparatus on your bench is used to ensure that your measurement of is as accurate as possible.
Explain how you use this apparatus to make sure your measurement of is as accurate as possible.
You may draw a diagram to help your explanation.
Answer
Place a set square at each end of the line of straw pieces, with the straight edge against the ruler. This ensures the ends of the straws are aligned vertically with the ruler markings, avoiding parallax error when reading the width .
Use set squares at each end lined up with the ruler to avoid parallax error
Walkthrough
To measure accurately, the ends of the straw pieces must be read against the ruler. If reading directly, the eye might not be directly above the edge, causing a parallax error. By placing a set square at each end with one edge against the ruler and the other touching the straw, the position is projected vertically onto the ruler, eliminating parallax error.
Key Takeaways
Set squares are used as right-angled guides to project measurements onto a scale accurately.
Common Mistakes
Saying "to make it straight" without explaining the alignment with the ruler. Not mentioning both set squares.
Things to Be Careful About
The explanation must mention using the set squares at each end and aligning them with the ruler. A diagram showing the set squares is also acceptable.
The volume of the straw is given by the equation:
Use your answers from (a)(i) and (a)(iii) to calculate . Give your answer to two significant figures.
= ______
Working
Answer
= 5.7 cm
5.7 cm^3
Walkthrough
The volume of the straw (treated as a solid cylinder) is calculated using the formula . Substituting cm and cm gives cm. The mark scheme requires the answer to be given to 2 significant figures, so it is rounded to 5.7 cm.
Key Takeaways
When using a given formula, substitute the values carefully and round the final answer to the required number of significant figures.
Common Mistakes
Forgetting to square the diameter, using the radius instead of the diameter, or not rounding to 2 significant figures.
Things to Be Careful About
Use the candidate's own values from (a)(i) and (a)(iii). The value 3.14 is an approximation of , so use 3.14 exactly as given.
Method 2
Take the second straw.
Immerse the straw fully in the container of water as shown in Fig. 1.2.
Move the straw backwards and forwards in the water several times so that the water enters the straw.
Put a finger firmly over one end of the straw and remove the straw from the water.
Put the straw above the open end of the measuring cylinder and remove the finger so that the water is transferred into the measuring cylinder.
Repeat this process 5 more times for a total of 6 transfers.
Answer
= 24 cm (candidate-dependent reading to nearest 1 cm, must be less than 35 cm)
24 cm^3
Walkthrough
The water transferred from the straw is collected in a measuring cylinder. The volume is read from the cylinder. A typical internal volume of a straw is about 4 cm, so 6 transfers would give about 24 cm. The mark scheme requires the reading to be to the nearest 1 cm and less than 35 cm.
Key Takeaways
When reading a measuring cylinder, read the bottom of the meniscus at eye level. The precision depends on the smallest division of the cylinder.
Common Mistakes
Reading the top of the meniscus or not reading at eye level.
Things to Be Careful About
The volume must be less than 35 cm to stay within the capacity of the 50 cm cylinder and avoid spillage. Read to the nearest 1 cm.
Working
Answer
= 4.0 cm
4.0 cm^3
Walkthrough
The average volume of water in one straw is found by dividing the total volume by the number of transfers (6). Using cm, cm.
Key Takeaways
Averaging over multiple measurements reduces the effect of random errors.
Common Mistakes
Dividing by the wrong number (e.g. 5 instead of 6).
Things to Be Careful About
Carry forward the candidate's value from (b)(i). The answer should have an appropriate number of significant figures.
Answer
- Air bubbles may be trapped inside the straw in Method 2, reducing the volume of water collected.
- The internal volume of the straw is smaller than the external volume used in Method 1.
(Any two from: straw became squashed/damaged; small amount of water may remain in the straw; water sticks to the finger; some water falls out during transfer in Method 2; straw not completely filled.)
Air bubbles in the straw; internal volume is smaller than external volume
Walkthrough
Method 1 calculates the external volume of the straw (treating it as a solid cylinder). Method 2 measures the internal volume (the volume of water it can hold). These will differ because the straw has thickness, so the internal volume is smaller. Additionally, practical errors in Method 2 (air bubbles, water remaining in the straw, spillage) can cause further differences.
Key Takeaways
When comparing two different measurement methods, consider both systematic differences (e.g. measuring external vs internal dimensions) and random errors (e.g. spillage, bubbles).
Common Mistakes
Saying "human error" or "be more careful" without specifying the actual source of error.
Things to Be Careful About
The reasons must be specific and physically meaningful. Distinguish between the systematic difference (internal vs external volume) and practical errors (bubbles, spillage).
In this experiment you will investigate series and parallel combinations of resistors.
You are provided with:
- the circuit shown in Fig. 2.1 which includes two resistors X and Y
- two extra connecting leads.
The resistors are not identical.
The circuit shown in Fig. 2.1 has been assembled for you.
Close the switch.
Measure and record the potential difference across X and the current in the circuit.
Open the switch.
= ______
= ______
Answer
(example value; must be and to at least 1 decimal place)
(example value; must be and to at least 2 decimal places)
Candidate records to 1 d.p. and to 2 d.p.
Walkthrough
The candidate closes the switch briefly, reads the voltmeter across X and the ammeter in the circuit, and records both values with the correct units. The switch must be opened immediately after reading to prevent the resistors from overheating and the cell from draining.
Key Takeaways
Candidates must read analogue or digital meters to the precision demanded by the scale and record values with their units. Switches should be opened quickly during electrical measurements to avoid altering the components or the power supply.
Common Mistakes
- Recording readings without units.
- Reading the ammeter to only 1 decimal place when the scale requires 2.
- Leaving the switch closed for too long, causing the resistors to heat up and their resistance to change.
Things to Be Careful About
The mark scheme requires to at least 1 decimal place and , and to at least 2 decimal places and . Ensure trailing zeros are recorded if the scale demands them (e.g., , not ).
Calculate the resistance , the resistance of resistor X, using the equation:
= ______
Working
Answer
4.0 Ω (using candidate's values)
Walkthrough
The resistance of X is calculated using the equation . The candidate substitutes the values recorded in part (a)(i). Using the example values and , the calculation is .
Key Takeaways
Ohm's law is used to find resistance from measured potential difference and current. The result must include the unit ohms ().
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to include the unit in the final answer.
- Carrying forward an incorrect value from part (a)(i) without showing the substitution (though ecf is usually allowed in marking schemes).
Things to Be Careful About
Ensure the values substituted are from the candidate's own readings. If the candidate's or is outside the acceptable range, the calculation will be marked incorrect.
Suggest why the switch is opened after the readings of potential difference and current are taken.
Answer
To prevent the overheating of the resistors and to stop the cell from running down.
To prevent overheating of resistors / cell running down
Walkthrough
When a current flows through resistors, electrical energy is transferred to thermal energy stores. If the switch is left closed for too long, the resistors can overheat, potentially changing their resistance or becoming a burn hazard. Additionally, the cell will discharge more quickly than necessary.
Key Takeaways
In practical electrical experiments, switches should be opened as soon as readings are taken to preserve apparatus and ensure accurate, repeatable results.
Common Mistakes
- Saying "to save energy" without specifying what is being saved (the cell or the resistors from overheating).
- Saying "to avoid electric shock" which is not relevant for a 3 V cell.
Things to Be Careful About
Acceptable answers must mention overheating of resistors or the cell running down. "Heat" alone is often rejected in favour of "thermal energy" or "overheating".
Disconnect the voltmeter and reconnect it across Y.
Close the switch.
Measure and record the potential difference across Y.
Open the switch.
Calculate the resistance of Y.
= ______
= ______
Working
(example value)
Answer
Candidate records and calculates , which must be .
Walkthrough
The voltmeter is disconnected from X and connected in parallel across Y. The switch is closed briefly, and is recorded. Since X and Y are in series, the current is the same. The resistance is calculated using . The mark scheme requires , which is consistent with the example values ().
Key Takeaways
In a series circuit, the current is the same through all components, but the potential difference across each depends on its resistance. A larger resistance has a larger potential difference across it.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting that the current is the same for both resistors and using a different value.
- Not ensuring that the calculated is greater than as required by the mark scheme.
Things to Be Careful About
The voltmeter must be connected across Y only, not across both X and Y. Ensure the voltmeter terminals are connected correctly (positive to positive, negative to negative) to avoid a negative reading.
Complete the circuit diagram in Fig. 2.2 to show the resistors X and Y connected in parallel between W and Z.
Draw the voltmeter connected to measure the potential difference across both resistors.
Answer
X and Y are drawn in parallel between W and Z. The voltmeter is connected in parallel across the combination (between W and Z).
See diagram for parallel connection of X and Y between W and Z, with voltmeter across the combination.
Walkthrough
The candidate must complete Fig. 2.2 to show X and Y in parallel. This means drawing two separate branches between W and Z, one containing X and the other containing Y. The ammeter remains in the main circuit. The voltmeter must be connected in parallel across the entire parallel combination (i.e., between W and Z), not across just one resistor.
Key Takeaways
In a parallel circuit, the potential difference across each branch is the same. The voltmeter must measure this common potential difference by being connected across both branches.
Common Mistakes
- Drawing X and Y in series instead of parallel.
- Connecting the voltmeter across only one resistor instead of the combination.
- Forgetting to label the resistors X and Y.
Things to Be Careful About
Use standard circuit symbols. The voltmeter symbol is a circle with a V inside. The resistor symbol is a rectangle (or zigzag, but rectangle is standard for 5054). Ensure the connections cross cleanly without false junctions.
Disconnect the resistors and the voltmeter from the circuit on your bench and rearrange them to make the circuit shown in your circuit diagram in (b)(i).
Close the switch.
Measure and record the potential difference across the resistors and the total current through the resistors .
Open the switch.
Calculate the total resistance of the resistors in parallel, using the equation:
= ______
= ______
= ______
Working
(example value; must be )
(example value; must be )
Answer
Candidate records and , then calculates .
Walkthrough
The candidate rearranges the circuit to match the diagram in (b)(i). The switch is closed, and the potential difference across the parallel combination () and the total current through the combination () are recorded. The total resistance is calculated using . The mark scheme requires and .
Key Takeaways
In a parallel circuit, the total current is the sum of the currents in the branches, and the total resistance is less than the resistance of any individual branch.
Common Mistakes
- Reading the ammeter as the current through one branch instead of the total current.
- Forgetting that is the same across both branches.
Things to Be Careful About
The ammeter must be in the main circuit to measure the total current . Ensure readings are within the specified limits (, ).
Theory suggests that, if the two resistors are arranged in parallel, the total resistance of the resistors is given by:
Use the equation and your values of and from (a)(ii) and (a)(iv) to calculate .
= ______
Working
Answer
2.2 Ω (using candidate's values)
Walkthrough
The theoretical total resistance for two resistors in parallel is calculated using the given formula . Substituting the example values and gives .
Key Takeaways
The formula for two resistors in parallel can be used to calculate the theoretical total resistance. This value can then be compared with the experimental value .
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to add and in the denominator.
- Multiplying instead of dividing in the formula.
Things to Be Careful About
Use the candidate's own values of and from parts (a)(ii) and (a)(iv). Round the final answer to a sensible number of significant figures (usually 2 or 3, matching the data).
Two quantities can be considered to be equal within the limits of experimental accuracy if their values are within 10% of each other.
State whether your value of from (b)(ii) can be considered equal to calculated in (c)(i).
Support your statement with a calculation.
calculation
statement ______
Working
Since , the values are equal within the limits of experimental accuracy.
Answer
calculation: (or similar using candidate values)
statement: equal
Candidate calculates percentage difference between and and states whether they are equal within 10%.
Walkthrough
The candidate must determine if and are equal within 10% of each other. This is done by calculating the percentage difference: . Using the example values, . Since , the statement is that they are equal. The calculation must use both values and the statement must match the result of the calculation.
Key Takeaways
Experimental values often differ slightly from theoretical values due to measurement errors and component tolerances. A comparison within a specified tolerance (e.g., 10%) is used to judge if the results are consistent with theory.
Common Mistakes
- Calculating the percentage difference incorrectly (e.g., using in the denominator instead of , or forgetting the absolute value).
- Making a statement that does not match the calculation (e.g., saying 'not equal' when the difference is ).
Things to Be Careful About
The mark scheme requires a correct calculation to support the statement and a statement that matches the results. Ensure the calculation clearly shows the use of both and . The percentage can be calculated using either value as the denominator, but the standard approach is to use the theoretical value .
In this experiment you will determine the mass of a metre rule.
You are provided with:
- a metre rule
- a fixed mass taped to the rule at the 5.0 cm mark
- a pivot
- six 10 g slotted masses
- a piece of modelling clay.
The fixed mass has been taped to the metre rule at the 5.0 cm mark. Do not change the position of this mass.
Place the pivot below the 25.0 cm mark on the metre rule, as shown in Fig. 3.1.
Place two 10 g masses together to make a 20 g mass.
Place the 20 g mass on the metre rule and adjust the position of the mass until the rule is as close to balance as possible.
Determine the distance of the centre of the 20 g mass from the pivot when the metre rule is as close to balance as possible.
= ______
Working
Record the distance from the pivot (at ) to the centre of the mass to the nearest (e.g. ).
Answer
40.0 cm
Walkthrough
In this step, the candidate balances the metre rule horizontally on the pivot placed at the mark with a mass placed on the short side (or as needed to balance the fixed mass at the mark and the rule's own weight acting at the centre of mass).
The position of the centre of the mass on the metre rule is noted, and the distance from the pivot at is determined by subtracting the mark positions:
The reading must be recorded to the precision of the metre rule scale, which is to the nearest (or ), and must be less than . A typical value is around .
Key Takeaways
- All length readings taken from a standard metre rule must include one decimal place ( precision), including trailing zeros.
- The distance is measured relative to the pivot, not from the zero end of the rule.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to record the measurement to (e.g. writing "40" instead of "40.0").
- Recording the mark on the rule instead of the distance from the pivot.
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure the rule is balanced horizontally before taking the reading.
- Avoid parallax error by looking directly perpendicular to the ruler markings when reading the position of the centre of the slotted mass.
Answer
Move the mass backwards and forwards along the rule by small amounts until the rule balances horizontally.
Move the mass backwards and forwards along the rule until balanced
Walkthrough
To find the exact position of balance on a pivot, the candidate gently slides or shifts the movable mass back and forth in small increments until the metre rule rests horizontally without tilting to either side.
Key Takeaways
- Finding an equilibrium point practically requires fine adjustment around the balance position.
- Clearly describe the action taken ("moving backwards and forwards").
Common Mistakes
- Vague statements such as "just put it on the rule" or "look at it".
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure the phrase conveys an iterative adjustment (moving back and forth) to pinpoint the balance position.
Record in Table 3.1 the distance of the centre of the mass from the pivot for mass .
Find the distance of the centre of the mass from the pivot for values of mass , 40 g, 50 g and 60 g, using the 10 g masses provided.
Record all values of in Table 3.1.
Calculate for each mass and record all values in Table 3.1.
Give your answers to an appropriate number of significant figures.
Table 3.1
| 20 | ||
| 30 | ||
| 40 | ||
| 50 | ||
| 60 |
Working
Representative values of recorded to , decreasing as mass increases, and corresponding calculated values of to 2 significant figures:
Answer
| 20 | 40.0 | 0.025 |
| 30 | 28.5 | 0.035 |
| 40 | 22.0 | 0.045 |
| 50 | 18.0 | 0.056 |
| 60 | 15.0 | 0.067 |
Table completed with d values to 0.1 cm (decreasing with increasing m) and 1/d values to 2 significant figures
Walkthrough
- For each added mass (), the position of balance is found, and the distance from the pivot is measured and recorded.
- As mass increases, the required distance to balance the clockwise and anticlockwise moments must decrease ( approximately).
- Every entry in the column must be recorded to the nearest (e.g. , , etc.).
- For each row, calculate :
- Record all values consistently to 2 significant figures (or 3 significant figures matching the precision of ).
Key Takeaways
- Increasing load requires a shorter distance from the pivot to maintain equilibrium of moments.
- Precision rule: all raw length readings must have consistent decimal places (). Derived quantities like must maintain appropriate significant figures (typically 2 or 3 s.f.).
Common Mistakes
- Inconsistent number of significant figures in the column (e.g. mixing and ).
- Omitting the ".0" for whole-number readings.
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure that calculated values are rounded correctly to 2 significant figures without truncation errors.
Answer
The required balance distance would be greater than , which is off the end of the metre rule.
The distance d would be off the end of the rule (greater than 75 cm)
Walkthrough
The pivot is positioned at the mark on the rule. The maximum possible distance from the pivot to the long end of the rule is:
To balance the fixed anticlockwise moment with a smaller mass of only , the required moment arm would exceed (e.g. roughly ). Therefore, the mass would fall off the end of the rule before balance could be achieved.
Key Takeaways
- Practical apparatus has physical boundary constraints (here, the length of the metre rule beyond the pivot).
- Smaller loads require larger lever arms to provide the necessary counteracting moment.
Common Mistakes
- Vague explanations like "the mass is too small" or "it won't balance" without explaining why (i.e. the balance point is beyond the end of the rule).
Things to Be Careful About
- Explicitly state that the position is beyond the physical length/end of the ruler (or ).
Using the grid provided in Fig. 3.2 on page 11, plot a graph of on the y-axis against on the x-axis.
Start your axes from the origin (0, 0).
Draw the straight line of best fit.
Answer
- Axes: Label y-axis as (or ) and x-axis as .
- Scales: Both axes start from . Use sensible, linear scales occupying more than half the grid (e.g. x-axis: up to ; y-axis: up to ).
- Plotting: Plot all five points accurately to within half a small square.
- Best-fit line: Draw a single, thin, straight line of best fit that passes evenly through the plotted points.
Linear graph of 1/d against m plotted from (0,0) with best-fit straight line drawn
Walkthrough
To plot the graph correctly:
- Axes and Units: Clearly write on the vertical (y) axis and on the horizontal (x) axis.
- Origin & Scale: The question explicitly requires starting axes from . Choose convenient scales:
- x-axis: to , where 1 major grid division () represents .
- y-axis: to , where 1 major grid division represents .
Both scales are linear, easy to read, and occupy well over half of the provided graph grid.
- Plotting: Mark each point with a small neat cross ( or ) or a dot in a circle, positioned within small square of its correct value.
- Line of Best Fit: Use a clear ruler to draw a straight line that has a balanced distribution of points on either side and follows the overall trend.
Key Takeaways
- Always ensure scales use more than half the grid in both directions and avoid awkward ratios (such as 3s, 7s, etc.).
- When instructed to start from , the origin must be .
- Best-fit lines should be thin, straight (not multiple lines or sketchy), and reflect the trend of all points.
Common Mistakes
- Using non-linear scales or awkward scales (e.g. 1 major division = 3 units).
- Forgetting to include units on axis labels.
- Drawing a thick, feathered, or point-to-point line.
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure the line is drawn using a sharp pencil and a 30 cm ruler.
Calculate the gradient of your line.
Indicate on the graph the points you use.
Show all your working.
= ______
Working
Select two points on the line of best fit separated by more than half the line ():
- Point 1:
- Point 2:
Answer
0.0011 cm^-1 g^-1
Walkthrough
- Mark the Triangle: Draw a large right-angled triangle on the graph grid with its hypotenuse lying on the best-fit line. The horizontal base must span at least half the length of the drawn line ().
- Read Coordinates: Read the coordinates and directly from the line of best fit (do not use raw data points unless they lie precisely on the line).
- Compute Gradient: Substitute the values and compute (typically around ).
Key Takeaways
- Gradient is calculated as from points on the line, never as a single coordinate .
- Use a large triangle covering at least half the drawn line to minimize read-off errors.
Common Mistakes
- Using a triangle that is too small ( of the line length).
- Inverting the ratio (calculating instead of ).
- Choosing original data points that do not lie on the line.
Things to Be Careful About
- Clearly indicate the chosen points on the graph by dashed lines or coordinates.
The mass of the metre rule can be calculated using the equation:
Use your value of in (b)(ii) to calculate .
= ______
Working
Using the formula given with :
Answer
120 g
Walkthrough
- Use the equation provided in the question:
- Substitute your calculated gradient from part (b)(ii):
- Subtract from 160:
- The expected value of for a typical wooden metre rule falls within the range .
Key Takeaways
- Accurately substitute values into empirical or derived physics relations.
- Quote the final answer to an appropriate number of significant figures (2 or 3 s.f.).
Common Mistakes
- Arithmetic or rounding errors when computing .
- Omitting the unit (grams).
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure error-carried-forward from the gradient value in (b)(ii) is maintained if was slightly different.
Remove all the 10 g masses from the metre rule. Do not remove the mass fixed to the rule.
You have been provided with a piece of modelling clay.
Use the apparatus in (a) and your graph in (b)(i) to find the mass of the piece of modelling clay.
Record any measurements you make and show your working.
mass of piece of modelling clay = ______
Working
- Place the piece of modelling clay on the metre rule and adjust its position until the rule balances horizontally.
- Measure the distance from the centre of the modelling clay to the pivot:
- Calculate :
- Locate on the y-axis of the graph in (b)(i), move horizontally to intercept the best-fit line, and read down to the x-axis to find the mass .
Answer
35 g
Walkthrough
- The candidate places the piece of modelling clay on the ruler and shifts it until the ruler balances horizontally, identical to the procedure in part (a).
- Measure the distance from the pivot to the centre of the clay (e.g. ).
- Compute the reciprocal value:
- Use the calibration graph plotted in (b)(i):
- Find the value of on the vertical axis.
- Draw a horizontal line across to the straight line of best fit.
- From this intersection point, project vertically downwards to read the mass of the modelling clay on the horizontal () axis.
- Record the mass of the clay corresponding to the graph read-off.
Key Takeaways
- Calibration curves/graphs can be used to determine an unknown quantity by measuring an accessible dependent variable and interpolating.
- Working must clearly show the measurement of , the calculation of , and the graphical interpolation.
Common Mistakes
- Reading the mass directly without calculating .
- Omitting the recorded measurement of or the calculation of .
Things to Be Careful About
- Show clear dashed construction lines on the graph in Fig. 3.2 showing how the reading was obtained.
A student uses ice cubes to investigate the time taken for different masses of ice to melt when the ice cubes are placed in water.
Plan an experiment using ice cubes to investigate how the mass of ice affects the time taken for the ice to melt.
You are not required to do this experiment.
The following apparatus is available:
- top pan balance
- supply of ice cubes
- 250 beaker
- supply of cold water
- stopwatch.
You may also use other apparatus and materials that are usually available in a school laboratory.
In your plan, you should:
- explain briefly how to do the investigation
- state the key variables to keep constant
- draw a table, with column headings, to show how to display readings (you are not required to enter any readings in the table)
- explain how to use these readings to reach a conclusion.
You do not have to include a diagram of the apparatus you use but you may do so if it helps your plan.
Method
- Measure the mass of one or more ice cubes on the top pan balance.
- Put a fixed volume (e.g. 250 ) of cold water into the beaker.
- Add the ice cubes to the water and start the stopwatch.
- Stop the stopwatch when the last piece of ice has melted; record the time taken.
- Repeat using different masses (or different numbers) of ice cubes, keeping all other variables constant.
Variables to keep constant
- initial temperature of the water
- volume (or mass) of the water
- room temperature
- size of the individual ice cubes
Results table
| Mass of ice / g | Time for ice to melt / s |
|---|---|
Conclusion
Compare the melting times for the different masses of ice. If larger masses take longer to melt, then the mass of ice does affect the time taken. Alternatively, plot a graph of time against mass of ice and read the trend from its shape.
Plan: measure the mass of ice, add it to a fixed volume of cold water and time how long it takes to melt; repeat for different masses of ice; keep the initial water temperature, volume of water, room temperature and ice cube size constant; table of mass against time; compare the times (or plot a graph of time against mass) to reach a conclusion.
Walkthrough
This is a planning question — you do not perform the experiment, you just describe how it would be done. The mark scheme rewards six separate things, so work through each in turn.
First identify the variables. The aim is "how the mass of ice affects the time taken for the ice to melt", so the mass of ice is the independent variable (the thing you change) and the time taken to melt is the dependent variable (the thing you measure). Everything else that could affect the melting time must be kept constant.
The method: take a fixed volume of cold water in the beaker and measure the mass of one or more ice cubes on the top pan balance. Add the ice to the water, start the stopwatch, and stop it when the last piece of ice has melted — this is the time taken. Repeat for different masses of ice (for example 1, 2, 3, 4 cubes), keeping the starting conditions the same each time so that only the mass changes.
Key variables to keep constant: the initial temperature of the water, the volume (or mass) of the water, the room temperature, and the size of the individual ice cubes. Any of these could change the melting time by themselves, so they must not vary between runs.
The table needs two columns: the mass of ice (or number of ice cubes) with its unit (g), and the time taken with its unit (s). The units go in the column headings; the readings go in the cells below.
For the conclusion, compare the melting times for different masses. If larger masses take longer, the mass of ice does affect the time taken. Alternatively plot a graph of time against mass and look at its trend — both routes are accepted.
Each of the six marking points is covered: measure the mass and add ice to water (MP1), time the melting (MP2), repeat for different masses (MP3), give at least one key variable (MP4), table with units (MP5), and a way to reach the conclusion (MP6).
Key Takeaways
- In a planning question, cover every area the stem asks for: method, variables, table, conclusion — each is a separate credit.
- Identify the independent and dependent variables before writing anything.
- A results table has the quantity name and its unit in the heading, with readings in the cells.
- Conclusions are drawn by comparing readings or by reading the trend of a graph.
Common Mistakes
- Missing the first step of measuring the ice's mass — the mark scheme explicitly requires "measure the mass of the ice cubes" and "add ice to water" (MP1).
- Forgetting to repeat for different masses — repetition over a range of masses is a credited point (MP3).
- Leaving units out of the table headings — the table mark (MP5) requires "appropriate units".
- Listing no key variables, or listing irrelevant ones — the mark scheme wants a genuine control such as initial water temperature, water volume, room temperature or insulation.
- Writing a method that describes everything except actually timing the melting (MP2).
- Stating the conclusion without reference to the readings, e.g. just writing "mass affects the time" with no comparison or graph.
Things to Be Careful About
- This is a Paper 3 planning task, so you are not taking readings — describe what would be done, not what you got.
- State each control variable as a factor that stays the same; do not treat it as something to change.
- In the table, the unit is written in the column heading, not repeated in every cell.
- The conclusion must link the data back to the aim ("does mass affect the time") — either a comparison of readings or a graph is allowed by MP6.
- This question carries 6 marks, so a complete plan covering method, variables, table and conclusion is expected; a single-sentence answer cannot reach all six marking points.





