5054/32

Physics 5054/32October/November 2022

Cambridge O-Level · Practical Test · worked solutions for every part, with the mark scheme

4
questions
30
marks
120
minutes

Topics Observations and Measurements · Experimental Contexts · Analysis, Conclusions and Evaluation · Use of Techniques, Apparatus and Materials · Planning Experiments and Investigations

Q15MObservations and MeasurementsExperimental ContextsPlanning Experiments and InvestigationsFree sample

In this experiment you will investigate factors affecting friction.

You are provided with:

  • a block of wood with a small nail at one end
  • a spring attached to a loop of thread
  • a ruler kept in place on the bench with a small amount of adhesive putty
  • 2×100 g2 \times 100\text{ g} masses on the block of wood and two other 100 g100\text{ g} masses.

The supervisor has arranged the apparatus as shown in Fig. 1.1.

Rearrange the apparatus so that the end X of the spring is lined up with the zero end of the scale on the ruler as shown in Fig. 1.2. The string loop between the nail and the spring should be as straight as possible.

Slowly pull end Y of the spring in the direction shown in Fig. 1.2.

Observe that the spring extends until the pulling force overcomes the friction between the block and the bench.

At this point the block will slide a small distance in the direction of the pulling force. Stop pulling the spring, holding end Y at its new position on the scale.

End X of the spring is now also at a new position on the scale.

(a)

Record the readings xx and yy where:

  • xx is the new position on the scale of end X of the spring
  • yy is the new position on the scale of end Y of the spring.

xx = ______ mm\text{mm}
yy = ______ mm\text{mm}

1M
DifficultyMedium-Easy
Worked solution

Answer

Candidate must perform the experiment and record their own readings to the nearest mm, ensuring x<yx < y.

Example values:
x=15 mmx = 15\text{ mm}
y=45 mmy = 45\text{ mm}

Final answer

Candidate-dependent readings to nearest mm, with x < y. Example: x = 15 mm, y = 45 mm

Detailed explanation

Walkthrough

The candidate is expected to physically perform the experiment described. They pull the spring until the block just begins to slide, then record the new positions of end X (xx) and end Y (yy) on the ruler. The reading must be taken to the nearest millimetre. Because end X has moved from zero but end Y has moved further to stretch the spring, xx must be less than yy. Since this is a practical paper, the exact numerical values will vary from candidate to candidate depending on their apparatus and technique.

Key Takeaways

  • Practical readings must be taken to the precision the instrument allows (nearest mm for a standard ruler).
  • In this setup, the extension of the spring is proportional to the pulling force, and the reading yy is always greater than xx because the spring itself is stretched.

Common Mistakes

  • Reading to the wrong precision (e.g., to the nearest 0.5 mm or 1 cm when the scale only allows mm).
  • Forgetting to state that x<yx < y.
  • Inventing fixed numerical values instead of recognising this as a candidate-dependent practical task.

Things to Be Careful About

  • Ensure readings are taken at eye level to avoid parallax error against the ruler.
  • The string loop must be as straight as possible so the pull is horizontal and along the ruler.
  • Stop pulling exactly when the block first slides; any further pulling will increase yy without changing the friction force.
Techniques used
read spring extension to the nearest mmrecord candidate-dependent experimental readings
(b)

A student claims that xx is directly proportional to yy.

Plan an experiment to find out if the student's claim is correct.

In your plan you should:

  • state two quantities that you will keep constant
  • describe how you will obtain different values of xx and yy
  • describe how the results will show if the student's claim is correct.

You do not have to do this experiment.

4M
DifficultyMedium
Worked solution

Answer

Control variables (state any two):

  • Same type of surface (the bench top)
  • Same block of wood (same size, mass, and surface material)
  • Same spring (same spring constant)

Method (manipulation):

  • Vary the mass added to the block by using the spare 100 g100\text{ g} masses (add them one by one or in different combinations). This changes the normal contact force and therefore the friction, giving different values of xx and yy.

How the results show if the claim is correct:

  • Plot a graph of xx against yy. If the student's claim is correct (that xx is directly proportional to yy), the graph will be a straight line passing through the origin. Alternatively, calculate the ratio x:yx : y for each set of readings; if it is constant, the claim is correct.
Final answer

Control: same surface, same block, same spring. Method: vary mass added to block. Conclusion: plot x vs y; straight line through origin or constant x/y ratio proves direct proportionality.

Detailed explanation

Walkthrough

To test whether xx is directly proportional to yy, the student must obtain multiple pairs of (x,y)(x, y) values. Since the apparatus is fixed, the only way to change the friction force (and thus the spring extensions xx and yy) is to change the normal force between the block and the bench. This is done by adding the spare 100 g100\text{ g} masses to the block.

To ensure a fair test, all other factors that could affect friction or the spring extension must be kept constant. These include the surface material, the block itself, and the spring used.

Once multiple pairs of readings are collected, direct proportionality is tested by plotting a graph of xx (dependent variable) against yy (independent variable). A directly proportional relationship produces a straight-line graph that passes through the origin (0,0)(0,0). Another valid check is to calculate the ratio x/yx/y for each trial; if it is constant, the variables are directly proportional.

Key Takeaways

  • In friction experiments, the normal force is varied by changing the mass on the surface.
  • Control variables must isolate the relationship being tested; here, surface, block, and spring must remain unchanged.
  • Direct proportionality is confirmed by a straight-line graph through the origin or a constant ratio between the two variables.

Common Mistakes

  • Suggesting to change the surface or the spring to get different values (this changes the constants, not just the friction).
  • Failing to explain how the results will be analysed (e.g., just saying "look at the numbers" instead of specifying a graph or ratio).
  • Confusing direct proportionality with a linear relationship that has a non-zero y-intercept.

Things to Be Careful About

  • The plan must explicitly state how to obtain different values (vary the mass), not just list the control variables.
  • When describing the graph, specify which variable is on which axis (xx on the y-axis, yy on the x-axis, or vice versa, but be consistent), and mention the origin.
  • Ensure the control variables are genuinely constant across all trials (e.g., use the same side of the block against the bench).
Techniques used
identify control variables for a friction experimentvary the normal force by adding massesplan a graph to test direct proportionality

The rest of this paper

3 more questions
  • Q2Experimental Contexts · Observations and Measurements · Analysis, Conclusions and Evaluation5M
  • Q3Observations and Measurements · Experimental Contexts · Analysis, Conclusions and Evaluation · Use of Techniques, Apparatus and Materials5M
  • Q4Experimental Contexts · Observations and Measurements · Analysis, Conclusions and Evaluation · Use of Techniques, Apparatus and Materials15M
Loading the full paper…