Additional Mathematics 4037/12 — October/November 2025
Cambridge O-Level · Non-calculator · worked solutions for every part, with the mark scheme
Topics Calculus · Equations, inequalities and graphs · Quadratic functions · Logarithmic and exponential functions · Trigonometry · Factors of polynomials · +5 more
Approach
The cubic is already factorised, so the -intercepts come straight from the factors, and the -intercept from substituting . Since the leading term is (negative cubic), the curve falls from top-left to bottom-right with a minimum between and and a maximum between and .
Working
-intercepts: set each factor to zero.
-intercept: substitute .
Shape: the leading term is , so as and as . The curve crosses at , dips to a distinct minimum in the fourth quadrant between and , rises to cross at , reaches a distinct maximum in the first quadrant between and , then falls through into the fourth quadrant.
Answer
A negative cubic passing through , , and , with a minimum in the fourth quadrant between and and a maximum in the first quadrant between and .
Negative cubic crossing the x-axis at x = 1, 2.5 and 5, y-intercept 25, with a minimum between x = 1 and 2.5 and a maximum between x = 2.5 and 5
Walkthrough
The cubic is given in factorised form, which makes the intercepts immediate. Each factor , and gives one root: , and respectively. These are the three places the curve crosses the -axis.
For the -intercept we put : the product is , since the two negatives cancel. So the curve starts high on the -axis at .
To decide the overall shape, look at the leading term. Expanding just the leading parts, has leading term . A negative cubic comes down from the top-left and goes off to the bottom-right. Between consecutive roots the sign of alternates: positive for , negative for (a dip below the axis, the minimum in the fourth quadrant), positive for (a hump above the axis, the maximum in the first quadrant), and negative for .
Key Takeaways
- A factorised cubic hands you its -intercepts directly from the factors.
- The sign of the leading coefficient determines the end behaviour: negative cubic falls left-to-right overall.
- The -intercept is found by substituting into the factorised form — no expansion needed.
Common Mistakes
- Missing that the cubic is negative (leading term ) and sketching a positive cubic instead — this loses the shape mark.
- Taking as instead of .
- Sign slip at the -intercept: , not .
- Adding extra turns at the ends of the sketch — the mark scheme penalises "turning over at end points, suggesting further stationary points"; a cubic has at most two turning points.
- Omitting the stated intercept values; the marks for , , and are independent and must be marked or stated.
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme awards separate B1 marks for the shape (with a distinct minimum in the fourth quadrant and a distinct maximum in the first quadrant), for the three -intercepts, and for the -intercept — all three are needed for full marks.
- The turning points must be distinct and correctly placed; a flat or wrong-signed sketch scores zero for shape.
- No scale is required, but the intercept values must be marked on the axes or stated with no contradiction and no extra critical values.
Approach
"Hence" means use the sketch from part (a). The inequality holds wherever the curve is on or below the -axis.
Working
From the sketch: the curve is below the -axis for and for , and equals zero at , and . Since the inequality is , the endpoints are included.
Answer
1 <= x <= 2.5 or x >= 5
Walkthrough
The word "hence" tells us to use the graph from part (a) rather than testing intervals algebraically. The product is exactly the -value of the sketched curve, so the inequality asks: where is the curve at or below the -axis?
From the sketch, the curve dips below the axis between and , and again after . Because the inequality is (not ), the points where — the intercepts themselves — are included, giving the closed intervals and .
Key Takeaways
- A "hence" instruction requires using the previous result — here, the sketch.
- includes the roots; would exclude them.
- The solution set of a cubic inequality is generally two disjoint intervals, both of which must be stated.
Common Mistakes
- Omitting one of the two intervals — both and carry a separate B1 mark.
- Using strict inequalities and dropping the endpoints , , , which the sign requires.
- Including the region where the curve is above the axis (positive ).
- Solving algebraically from scratch instead of using the sketch, which wastes time and risks sign errors.
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme marks each interval separately as the final answer, so both must appear.
- Endpoints must be included because the inequality is ; writing or loses the mark.
The polynomial is such that , where and are integers.
It is given that is a factor of .
When is divided by there is a remainder of 6.
Approach
Since is a factor of , the factor theorem gives . Since division by leaves remainder , the remainder theorem gives . These two equations are then solved simultaneously for and .
Working
Using the factor theorem with :
Using the remainder theorem with :
Subtracting:
Then:
Answer
a = 7, b = 14
Walkthrough
The factor theorem says that if is a factor of , then substituting must give zero. Substituting into gives , which simplifies to . The remainder theorem says that when is divided by , the remainder equals ; here that remainder is given as , so , i.e. . Subtracting the second equation from the first eliminates , giving , so , and back-substitution gives .
Key Takeaways
- The factor theorem: is a factor of exactly when .
- The remainder theorem: dividing by leaves remainder .
- Two unknown coefficients require two independent conditions, each converted into a linear equation.
Common Mistakes
- Sign slips when substituting negative values such as or .
- Confusing the two theorems — using instead of for the factor .
- Forgetting that the remainder equation equals , not .
- Arithmetic errors in solving the simultaneous equations.
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme awards B1 for each correctly formed equation, so both substitutions must be shown explicitly before solving.
- Keep exact integer values throughout; no rounding is involved.
Approach
Use the known factor to write , then show the quadratic factor has a negative discriminant, so it has no real roots and the only real root comes from .
Working
With and :
Dividing by the known factor (or comparing coefficients):
Check: . ✓
For the quadratic factor , the discriminant is:
Since the discriminant is negative, has no real solutions. Therefore reduces to , giving the single real root .
Answer
The discriminant of the quadratic factor is , so it has no real roots; hence has only one real root, .
(x+2)(2x^2+3x+7) = 0; discriminant = -47 < 0, so the only real root is x = -2
Walkthrough
From part (a) we know and , and we already know is a factor. Dividing the cubic by (by long division or by matching coefficients) gives the factorisation . A product equals zero only when one of its factors equals zero. The linear factor gives the real root . For the quadratic factor we compute its discriminant: . Because this is negative, the quadratic never crosses the -axis and contributes no real roots. Hence the whole cubic has exactly one real root.
Key Takeaways
- A cubic with one known linear factor can be fully factorised by division or coefficient matching.
- The sign of the discriminant determines whether a quadratic has real roots: negative means none.
- Counting real roots of a polynomial can be done factor by factor.
Common Mistakes
- Sign errors in the discriminant formula, e.g. computing or mis-substituting , , .
- Factorising incorrectly and obtaining a quadratic with a non-negative discriminant.
- Stating "the discriminant is negative" without evaluating it — the mark scheme requires the correct value.
- Concluding without linking the negative discriminant back to the number of real roots of the original equation.
Things to Be Careful About
- This part depends on the values of and found in part (a); follow-through applies to your own quadratic factor, but it must have a negative discriminant for the argument to work.
- The conclusion must be stated explicitly: negative discriminant means no real roots from the quadratic, leaving only .
The sum of the first two terms of a geometric progression is 9.
The sum to infinity of this geometric progression is 25.
Approach
Let the first term be and the common ratio be . Write the sum of the first two terms and the sum to infinity as two equations, then divide one by the other to eliminate and solve for .
Working
Sum of the first two terms:
Sum to infinity (valid since ):
Factorising the first equation and dividing by the second:
Answer
r = 4/5 or r = -4/5
Walkthrough
A geometric progression with first term and common ratio has terms . The sum of the first two terms is , which the question tells us equals . The sum to infinity exists only when , and equals , which equals .
Rather than solving for first, the efficient route is to divide the two equations: the cancels, leaving an equation in alone. Dividing by gives , and the left side is the difference of two squares, . Rearranging gives , so . Both roots are valid since both satisfy , so both must be reported.
Key Takeaways
- The sum to infinity formula requires .
- Dividing two equations sharing an unknown is a quick way to eliminate it.
- is the difference of two squares.
- A squared equation generally yields two solutions; both must be checked and given.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the negative root and giving only (the mark scheme explicitly awards the final B1 for ).
- Using the wrong sum formula, e.g. with the wrong sign, giving with the wrong value.
- Not checking that both roots satisfy (here they both do).
- Cancelling incorrectly when dividing the fractions.
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme is dependent: the mark requires both earlier equations to be correct, and the final mark requires all previous marks — so both starting equations must be right.
- Both values of are required; giving only one loses the final mark.
- Keep exact fractions: or are both accepted, but the working should show the exact equation .
Find the first term of this geometric progression for each possible value of the common ratio.
Approach
Substitute each value of from part (a) into the sum-to-infinity equation and solve for .
Working
For :
For :
Answer
a = 5 or a = 45
Walkthrough
Carrying forward the sum-to-infinity equation from part (a), each value of gives a different first term.
When , the denominator is , so , giving .
When , the denominator is , so , giving .
A quick check: with , , the first two terms sum to ✓. With , , they sum to ✓.
Key Takeaways
- Each admissible value of the common ratio pairs with exactly one first term for fixed and fixed two-term sum.
- Dividing by a fraction means multiplying by its reciprocal: .
Common Mistakes
- Sign error in when is negative: , not .
- Pairing the wrong with the wrong ; the check catches this instantly.
- Dividing by incorrectly instead of multiplying by .
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme awards one B1 for each correct value, so both and must be given, matched to the two values of from part (a).
- Keep the arithmetic exact: gives exactly, no decimals needed.
Approach
Factor out the leading coefficient from the quadratic and linear terms, complete the square inside the bracket, and simplify the constant term to write the expression in the form .
Working
Answer
2(x + 5/4)^2 - 1/8
Walkthrough
- Factor out from the first two terms: .
- To complete the square for , halve the coefficient of , giving .
- Write the bracket as .
- Distribute the factor of : .
- Combine the constants: .
This gives and .
Key Takeaways
- When completing the square for , always factor out from the variable terms first: .
- Halve the middle term coefficient inside: .
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to multiply the squared term by when expanding the outer brackets.
- Halving incorrectly (e.g. getting instead of ).
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure exact fractions are retained throughout since this is on a non-calculator paper.
Approach
Use the completed square form from part (a). The squared term , so the minimum (stationary point) occurs when , giving and .
Working
From part (a):
At the stationary point:
Answer
(-5/4, -1/8)
Walkthrough
The question states 'Hence', meaning the result from part (a) must be used. For a quadratic written as , the vertex (stationary point) occurs at .
Using and , the coordinates are .
Key Takeaways
- For , the stationary point has coordinates .
- When a question says 'Hence', you must use the previous result; using calculus directly scores marks according to the mark scheme.
Common Mistakes
- Using differentiation (calculus) instead of the completed square form.
- Sign errors in the -coordinate, writing instead of .
Things to Be Careful About
- Write the answer clearly as a coordinate pair .
A function is such that , for , where is a constant.
It is given that exists.
Approach
For the inverse function to exist, must be a one-to-one function. A quadratic function has a turning point at its vertex. For the right-hand branch to be strictly increasing (and thus one-to-one), must be at least the -coordinate of the stationary point.
Working
From part (b), the stationary point is at .
Therefore, the least possible value of is:
Answer
-5/4
Walkthrough
A function has an inverse if and only if it is one-to-one. A parabola is many-to-one over its entire domain . To make one-to-one for , the domain must be restricted to one side of the vertex. The minimum point is at , so the function is strictly increasing for . Hence, the least value can take is .
Key Takeaways
- A quadratic function is one-to-one on either or .
- For a domain restricted in the form , the minimum valid value of is the -coordinate of the turning point.
Common Mistakes
- Giving the -coordinate () instead of the -coordinate ().
Things to Be Careful About
- The question asks for the value of , which is .
Using your value of , sketch the graphs of and .
Label each graph.
State the intercepts of each of the graphs with the axes.
Approach
Find the intercepts of for . Reflect the curve and its intercepts across the line to obtain the graph of .
Working
- For with :
- -intercept (set ):
- -intercepts (set ):
Since the domain is , is outside the domain.
Thus, the only -intercept is .
- For , the graph is the reflection of in the line :
- -intercept:
- -intercept:
Answer
Intercepts for :
- -intercept at (or )
- -intercept at (or )
Intercepts for :
- -intercept at (or )
- -intercept at (or )
y = f(x) has x-intercept -1 and y-intercept 3; y = f^-1(x) has x-intercept 3 and y-intercept -1
Walkthrough
- Calculate the intercepts of :
- When , , giving the -intercept .
- When , , so or . Because the domain is restricted to , the root is excluded, leaving only the -intercept .
- The graph of starts at the vertex , passes through and , and curves upwards in the first quadrant.
- The inverse function is the reflection of in the line . Swapping the coordinates of the intercepts gives:
- -intercept at
- -intercept at
- Starting point at .
- Sketch both curves on the axes, labelling and , showing their correct curvatures and clearly marking the intercepts.
Key Takeaways
- The graph of is always the reflection of across the line .
- Reflecting across swaps the coordinates of every point, so an intercept becomes and becomes .
- When the domain of is restricted, make sure to check which intercepts lie inside the domain.
Common Mistakes
- Including both roots and for even though lies outside .
- Drawing a full parabola instead of only the restricted branch .
- Drawing with incorrect curvature (not reflecting properly across ).
Things to Be Careful About
- Clearly label each graph ( and ).
- Explicitly state the numerical values of the intercepts on the axes.
Approach
Use the power rule to absorb the coefficients, write the constant 3 as , then combine using the subtraction rule.
Working
Apply the power rule to each term:
since . Combine using the subtraction rule:
Answer
lg(a^5 / (1000 b^4))
Walkthrough
The expression mixes multiples of logarithms with a plain number, so the goal is to make everything a logarithm first. The power rule absorbs the coefficients 5 and 4, giving . The constant 3 is not yet a logarithm, but since , we have . Now all three terms are logarithms, and the subtraction rule combines them in one step: subtracting divides by , and subtracting divides by 1000.
Key Takeaways
- The power rule moves a coefficient inside the logarithm as an exponent.
- Any integer can be written as , which is the key step for absorbing constants.
- Subtraction of logarithms corresponds to division of the arguments.
Common Mistakes
- Writing : the laws combine products and quotients, never sums or differences inside one logarithm.
- Forgetting to convert the constant 3 into , leaving a stray term outside the logarithm.
- Sign slips: becomes or division by , not in the numerator.
Things to Be Careful About
- The answer must be a single base-10 logarithm; any equivalent form such as is accepted.
- The mark scheme awards a B1 for recognising and a B1 for using the power rule, so both steps must be visible in the working.
Approach
Change the base of to base 5, giving a reciprocal. Setting the expression to zero produces a quadratic in , which yields two values of .
Working
By the change-of-base rule, , so the equation becomes:
Multiplying through by :
Case 1: gives , so:
Case 2: gives , so:
Both values give and , so both are valid.
Answer
x = 4 or x = -4/5
Walkthrough
The two logarithms have different bases — base 5 and base — so they cannot be combined directly. The change-of-base rule converts the second logarithm into base 5: . The equation is now where . Multiplying by gives , so — the negative root must not be discarded. Converting back: means , giving ; means , giving . Both are checked: each makes positive and not equal to 1, so both logarithms are defined.
Key Takeaways
- Change of base turns a logarithm with a variable base into a reciprocal of a fixed-base logarithm.
- An equation of the form is a disguised quadratic, .
- means , which is where the fractional answer comes from.
Common Mistakes
- Rejecting or crossing out : the mark scheme explicitly gives A0 if it is rejected — it is a valid solution.
- Forgetting the when taking the square root of and finding only .
- Not changing the base at all and trying to subtract logarithms of different bases directly.
- Failing to check that (a base cannot be 1); here both roots pass, but the check should be made.
Things to Be Careful About
- Both solutions must be given; the mark scheme awards one mark each and penalises rejecting the negative root.
- The change-of-base step earns the B1, so it must be shown explicitly in the working.
- The domain requirements and should be verified for each root found.
Solve the equation .
Approach
The equation splits into two cases: the expression inside the modulus equals , or it equals . Solve each quadratic and keep every root.
Working
Case 1:
Factorise:
Case 2:
Using the quadratic formula with , , :
Answer
x = 5/2, x = -3, x = (-1 + √41)/4, x = (-1 - √41)/4
Walkthrough
The modulus equals exactly when or , so the single equation becomes two ordinary quadratic equations.
For the first case, rearranges to . This factorises as , giving and . Both must be kept — the mark scheme explicitly penalises rejecting just because it is negative; there is no reason to reject it since substituting back gives .
For the second case, rearranges to . Its discriminant is , which is not a perfect square, so the quadratic formula gives the exact surd answers .
All four values satisfy the original equation, so all four are solutions.
Key Takeaways
- An equation of the form (with ) always splits into and .
- Every root from either branch is a genuine solution — never discard negative or irrational roots without checking them against the original equation.
- When factorisation fails (non-square discriminant), use the quadratic formula and leave the answer in exact surd form.
Common Mistakes
- Solving only one branch of the modulus and reporting just two roots instead of four.
- Rejecting because it is negative — the mark scheme awards A0 for this.
- Writing the second case's answer with a negative denominator, e.g. — the scheme requires the denominator to be positive.
- Sign slips forming the rearranged quadratics: forgetting that moving across changes its sign, or miscomputing as instead of .
- Rounding the surd answers to decimals when an exact form is expected.
Things to Be Careful About
- Both quadratics must be correctly written as three-term equations equal to zero before solving (this is what the M marks check).
- The final answers should be given in exact form: , and .
- Check each root against the original modulus equation if unsure — here all four genuinely work.
The point has coordinates .
The point has coordinates .
The point has coordinates .
Approach
Use the gradient formula for each pair of points.
Working
Answer
Gradient AB = 6/8, gradient AC = -2/14, gradient BC = -8/6
Walkthrough
For each pair of points, the gradient is the change in divided by the change in . For : from to , the rise is and the run is , giving . For : the rise is and the run is , giving . For : the rise is and the run is , giving . The mark scheme accepts these unsimplified forms, so there is no need to cancel.
Key Takeaways
- The gradient formula works for any ordered pair of points.
- Subtract coordinates in a consistent order (second point minus first point).
- Watch the double negative when a coordinate is negative, as with .
Common Mistakes
- Subtracting coordinates in opposite orders for the numerator and denominator, flipping the sign.
- Mishandling and writing instead of .
- Simplifying unnecessarily and risking arithmetic slips — the unsimplified fractions earn full marks.
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme pays B1 for two correct unsimplified gradients and B1 for all three, so accuracy on all three pairs matters.
- Keep the fractions exactly as formed; equivalent simplified forms are accepted (oe), but unsimplified is safest.
Approach
From part (a), , so and angle . By the angle in a semicircle, is a diameter of the circle. The centre is the midpoint of , and the radius follows from the distance from the centre to .
Working
Midpoint of :
Square of the radius, using centre and point :
Equation of the circle:
Answer
(x - 5)^2 + (y - 3)^2 = 50
Walkthrough
The word "Hence" tells us to use the gradients from part (a). Multiplying the gradients of and gives , so the lines and are perpendicular: the angle at is a right angle. A standard circle theorem says the angle in a semicircle is a right angle, so the right angle at must stand on a diameter — meaning is the diameter of the circle through , and .
The centre of a circle is the midpoint of any diameter, so the centre is the midpoint of : averaging the coordinates of and gives .
The radius is the distance from the centre to any point on the circle, for instance . Using the squared-distance form directly (the equation needs , so no square root is needed): .
Substituting centre and into gives the equation.
Key Takeaways
- If two gradients multiply to , the lines are perpendicular.
- A right angle inscribed in a circle subtends a diameter (angle in a semicircle theorem) — this is how three points determine the circle here.
- The centre of the circle through three points with a right angle is the midpoint of the hypotenuse-side (the diameter).
- The circle equation needs the centre and the square of the radius; working with avoids a square root entirely.
Common Mistakes
- Not using the part (a) result and instead solving simultaneous equations for the centre — slower and error-prone.
- Taking the wrong pair as the diameter (e.g. halving or ); the mark scheme only allows centres from the correct diameter, or / by a different (incorrect) route — the correct centre is .
- Forgetting to square the coordinate differences, or subtracting in the wrong order and introducing sign errors (squared, so order does not matter if done consistently).
- Writing instead of in the equation.
- Expanding the brackets instead of leaving the completed-square form — the standard form is expected.
Things to Be Careful About
- The M1 requires using the centre together with one of , or to get (or halving a full side length); the centre must not be one of , , .
- The A1 accepts in place of for .
- Leave the answer in the form ; expanding to is an equivalent form (oe) but the completed-square form is safest.
- Since is exact, no decimal rounding is involved.
On the axes, sketch the graph of .
State the intercepts with the axes.
State the equation of any asymptote.
Approach
To sketch the graph of :
- Find the vertical asymptote by setting the argument of the logarithm to zero: .
- Find the -intercept by setting .
- Find the -intercept by setting .
- Sketch a strictly increasing logarithmic curve in the third, second, and first quadrants that approaches the vertical asymptote as and passes through the calculated intercepts.
Working
Vertical asymptote:
-intercept:
Set :
So the -intercept is or .
-intercept:
Set :
So the -intercept is or .
Answer
- Asymptote: (or )
- -intercept: (or )
- -intercept:
- Graph: An increasing logarithmic curve starting from near the vertical line in the third quadrant, crossing the -axis at , crossing the -axis at , and extending into the first quadrant.
Asymptote: x = -3/4; x-intercept: x = -0.5; y-intercept: y = 5 ln 3; Sketch: increasing curve through (-0.5, 0) and (0, 5 ln 3) with asymptote x = -0.75
Walkthrough
-
Vertical Asymptote:
The natural logarithm function is only defined for . As , . Therefore, the vertical asymptote occurs where the argument is zero:On the sketch, draw a dashed vertical line at (in the second and third quadrants).
-
-intercept:
Setting gives , so . Using the exponential definition, , which leads to , so . The curve crosses the negative -axis to the right of the vertical asymptote (). -
-intercept:
Setting gives . Since , , so the curve crosses the positive -axis. -
Drawing the Curve:
Draw a smooth, concave-down, strictly increasing curve that approaches the vertical asymptote downwards into the third quadrant, passes through on the -axis, passes through on the -axis, and continues growing at a decreasing rate into the first quadrant.
Key Takeaways
- For any function of the form , the vertical asymptote is always found at .
- The domain is when .
- Always leave values in exact logarithmic form (e.g., ) when working on non-calculator papers.
Common Mistakes
- Confusing the asymptote equation with a horizontal line (e.g. writing instead of ).
- Forgetting that and setting to find the -intercept instead of the asymptote.
- Drawing the curve crossing the asymptote or curling backwards.
- Drawing the asymptote on the wrong side of the -axis.
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure the relative positions of the asymptote () and the -intercept () are clear and correct (the intercept must lie to the right of the asymptote).
- State the equation of the asymptote explicitly as and clearly mark or state both intercepts.
A curve is such that .
The curve has gradient at the point .
Approach
Integrate once to get , using the gradient condition at to find the constant . Integrate again to get , using the point to find the constant . Then solve for the stationary point and substitute into for its -coordinate.
Working
Integrating with respect to :
Use the gradient condition :
Integrating again:
Use the point :
Stationary point where :
Then
Answer
(-2, 0)
Walkthrough
We are given the second derivative and two conditions: the gradient is at the point . To recover the curve we integrate twice, and each integration introduces a constant that the conditions allow us to pin down.
First integration: the general rule for integrating is to divide by , raising the index by one. Here , so the new index is and we divide by , giving .
To find , substitute and set the derivative equal to : since , we get . So .
Second integration: integrating raises the index to and divides by , giving ; integrating the constant gives . So .
To find , substitute the point : , so .
A stationary point occurs where the gradient is zero. Setting gives , and raising both sides to the power (or simply inverting) gives , so . Substituting into : .
Key Takeaways
- Integrating a second derivative twice recovers the original function, with one constant of integration at each stage.
- Each given condition (a gradient value, a point on the curve) determines exactly one constant.
- Stationary points are found by solving ; the -coordinate comes from substituting into , not .
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the chain-rule factor when integrating — you must divide by (the coefficient of ) as well as by the new index; the scheme's M1 is specifically for the correct form.
- Forgetting the constants of integration, or using the wrong condition for each one: the gradient condition fixes in , the point fixes in .
- Sign errors: has a negative leading term; dropping the minus sign gives and everything downstream fails.
- Solving incorrectly — the answer is , not misapplied with a sign slip.
- Substituting into instead of to get the -coordinate.
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme requires each integration step in the correct form ( then ) with a visible attempt at substitution for each constant — show both substitutions in full.
- The scheme's Dep M1 notes mean the constant-finding marks depend on the earlier integration being in the right form.
- Note that , so the point lies in the domain where is defined — the stationary point is valid.
- Give the answer as a coordinate pair ; the -value alone is not the full answer.
Approach
Substitute into the given second derivative and interpret the sign.
Working
Since the second derivative is positive at , the curve is concave upwards there, so the stationary point is a minimum.
Answer
The stationary point is a minimum point.
Minimum point (since f''(-2) = 1 > 0)
Walkthrough
The second derivative was given in the question stem, so no differentiation work is needed here. Substituting the stationary point's -value, , gives . A positive second derivative means the gradient is increasing through the point, so the curve has a local minimum there. (Equivalently, the first-derivative test could be used with -values just greater than , where changes from negative to positive.)
Key Takeaways
- The second-derivative test: at a stationary point means a minimum, means a maximum.
- When the second derivative is given in the question, evaluating it at the stationary point is the quickest nature test.
Common Mistakes
- Stating "minimum" without showing the substitution — the mark scheme explicitly requires evidence of substitution (B1).
- Using an incorrectly obtained from part (a) scores B0 even if the test is otherwise right.
- Misinterpreting the sign: positive second derivative means minimum (concave up), not maximum.
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme requires visible substitution of into either the second-derivative test or the first-derivative test — the bare word "minimum" does not earn the mark.
- The value must be evaluated correctly; a negative-base slip would be impossible here since .
- This conclusion is consistent with part (a): the point is a minimum of the curve .
Show that
where is an integer to be found.
Approach
Expand both squares; the cross terms and cancel, leaving . Then integrate the constant between the given limits.
Working
Adding, the cross terms cancel:
So the integral becomes
Hence , which is an integer as required.
Answer
k = 2
Walkthrough
The integrand looks complicated, but expanding each square reveals massive cancellation. The first square gives and the second gives . When added, the cross terms cancel exactly, and the Pythagorean identity collapses everything to the constant . Integrating a constant is trivial: . Substituting the limits in radians gives , so comparing with shows .
Key Takeaways
- Expanding always gives — the cross terms cancel.
- The identity can reduce a trigonometric integrand to a constant before any integration happens.
- Definite integration of a constant: multiply by the difference of the limits.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to double when adding the two expansions, or mishandling signs on the cross term .
- Not recognising that the result must be simplified using — leaving the answer as an unsimplified trig expression loses the accuracy mark.
- Arithmetic slips with limits such as writing instead of evaluating at each limit first ().
- Giving a decimal value for the integral instead of keeping it as an exact multiple of .
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme awards M1 for expanding both terms and attempting simplification via the correct identity or eliminating the terms, A1 for the antiderivative , a dependent M1 for correct use of limits, and A1 for — every one of these steps must appear in your working.
- Work entirely in radians here since the limits are multiples of .
- The final answer must be left in the form with identified as the integer ; do not convert to a decimal.
Solve the equation .
Approach
Write each binomial coefficient in factorial form, cancel the common factors , simplify numerically, then solve the resulting linear equation.
Working
So the equation becomes
Since , the left side simplifies:
Multiplying both sides by :
Rearranging:
The numerical side is , and the algebraic side is :
Answer
n = 40
Walkthrough
The equation involves two binomial coefficients with unknown in their top entries. The only practical route is to expand each coefficient into its factorial definition.
First, because in the denominator uses . Similarly since .
Substituting these gives the printed first line. The key cancellation follows from noticing that , so multiplying the left side by cancels it entirely, leaving over on the left. Now both sides share the factor , which can be removed by multiplying through.
What remains is . Cross-multiplying gives . The right side collapses to because consecutive factorials differ by one factor; the left side is because . Hence , so .
Key Takeaways
- Every binomial coefficient can be written as a ratio of factorials, which is often the only way to compare two coefficients algebraically.
- Factorials of nearby numbers telescope: , so ratios like are just .
- Ratios like reduce to a short product rather than evaluating large factorials.
Common Mistakes
- Writing the bottom entry of the coefficient incorrectly: for the denominator needs , not — the mark scheme's B1 marks specifically reward correct simplification of both the numerical factorials ( or ) and the algebraic ones ().
- Failing to spot that , leaving an unsolvable-looking mess instead of cancelling.
- Trying to evaluate and as huge numbers instead of forming the simple ratio .
- Arithmetic slips such as writing or concluding without subtracting the .
Things to Be Careful About
- Both B1 marks here are awarded for intermediate simplifications ( and ), so those steps must be visible in your working — jumping straight to risks losing marks.
- Keep the factorial definitions exact: , and double-check for each coefficient separately.
- The final answer must be exactly (cao); check it is consistent, e.g. holds.
A curve has equation for .
Approach
Differentiate using the quotient rule, remembering that the derivative of is by the chain rule. Then substitute .
Working
By the quotient rule:
At , noting that :
Answer
-1/4
Walkthrough
The curve is a quotient: an exponential on top and a linear expression underneath. The right tool is the quotient rule, which needs the derivatives of both parts.
The top is . This is a composite function — the exponential of — so the chain rule gives its derivative as : differentiate the outer exponential (leaving it unchanged) and multiply by the derivative of the inner .
The bottom, , has derivative .
Applying the quotient rule gives
Substituting : the first term in the numerator vanishes because of the factor , leaving ; the denominator is . So the gradient at is .
Key Takeaways
- The quotient rule: .
- The chain rule for exponentials: .
- Evaluating a derivative at a point after differentiating in general form.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting the chain-rule factor when differentiating (the mark scheme awards B1 specifically for ).
- Reversing the order in the quotient rule numerator ( instead of ), giving a sign error.
- Writing incorrectly as or similar when evaluating at .
- Dropping the minus sign: the answer must be negative, and the mark scheme says "Must be from correct working".
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme accepts either the single-fraction quotient-rule form or the product-rule form ; both earn full method credit.
- The final A1 requires the value to come from correct working — a correct-looking from wrong differentiation scores nothing.
- Keep the exact fraction ; do not round.
When , is increasing at the rate of 0.5 units per second.
Find the corresponding rate of change of .
Approach
Use the chain rule for rates of change, , with and from part (a).
Working
Substituting the known values:
Solving for :
Answer
-2 units per second
Walkthrough
This part connects the rate of change of with respect to time to the rate of change of with respect to time. The bridge between them is the chain rule written in rate form:
We are told increases at units per second, so . From part (a), the gradient at is . Substituting and dividing through gives .
The negative sign makes sense: since the curve is decreasing at this point ( falls as rises), must be decreasing over time while increases.
Key Takeaways
- Connected rates of change via .
- Interpreting the sign of a rate: a negative means is decreasing.
Common Mistakes
- Inverting the relation and computing instead of solving correctly.
- Losing the negative sign and answering .
- Using a wrong value of from part (a); the M1 allows follow-through on the candidate's own value, but the final A1 requires the correct from correct working in part (a).
Things to Be Careful About
- The mark scheme explicitly follows through on the candidate's part (a) value for the method mark, but the accuracy mark requires the correct derivative from correct working — so part (a) must be right for full marks here.
- State the unit: the rate is in units per second, matching the wording of the question.
For it is given that and .
Find in terms of .
Approach
Eliminate between the two parametric equations. Express in terms of , then use trigonometric identities to write entirely in terms of .
Working
From :
Write using :
Using and substituting :
Dividing numerator and denominator by :
Answer
y = 3(9/(2-x)^2 - 1)
Walkthrough
The question gives and each in terms of a parameter , and asks for directly in terms of . The strategy is to eliminate : solve one equation for a trig function of , then rewrite the other equation so it only involves that same trig function.
First, rearrange : subtract 2 and divide by to get .
Next, express using , so .
Now use the Pythagorean identity to replace with , giving everything in terms of alone:
Finally simplify the compound fraction: split the big fraction into , and since dividing by is multiplying by , this becomes . Hence
Key Takeaways
- To eliminate a parameter, isolate a trig function of the parameter from one equation and substitute into the other.
- The identity converts any mixture of and into a single variable.
- Compound fractions should be simplified by splitting them or by multiplying top and bottom by a common factor — the final answer must not contain fractions within fractions.
Common Mistakes
- Sign errors when rearranging ; check that , not .
- Forgetting to square when substituting into — the whole of must be squared.
- Leaving the answer as a fraction within a fraction; the mark scheme explicitly requires no nested fractions.
- Dropping the factor of 3 outside the bracket, or expanding incorrectly at the end.
- The final mark is dependent on all earlier marks being correct, so an early slip loses everything downstream.
Things to Be Careful About
- All four marks are B marks with dependencies: the last two are only awarded if the earlier steps are correct, so every line must be shown clearly.
- The answer may be given in any equivalent form (oe), e.g. , but must be fully simplified with no fractions inside fractions.
- Keep intact rather than writing inconsistently — both are equal, but consistency avoids sign slips.


