Mathematics (Syllabus D) 4024/21 — May/June 2017
Cambridge O-Level · Calculator · worked solutions for every part, with the mark scheme
Topics Algebra and Graphs · Geometry · Mensuration · Number · Trigonometry · Probability · +2 more
Trevor has a collection of 54 toy vehicles.
Of these, 24 are cars, 12 are vans and the rest are trucks.
Write the ratio of cars to vans to trucks in its simplest form.
______ : ______ : ______
Approach
First, determine the number of trucks in Trevor's collection. Then, write the ratio of cars to vans to trucks using the counts for each type. Finally, simplify this ratio to its lowest terms.
Working
Total vehicles =
Cars =
Vans =
Calculate the number of trucks:
Write the ratio of Cars : Vans : Trucks:
Simplify the ratio. The highest common factor (HCF) of 24, 12, and 18 is 6. Divide each term by 6:
The simplified ratio is:
Answer
4 : 2 : 3
Walkthrough
We are given the total number of toy vehicles and the specific counts for cars and vans. To find the count for trucks, we subtract the known counts from the total. This gives us three numbers representing the quantities of each vehicle type. A ratio compares these quantities side-by-side. To put a ratio in its simplest form, we divide all parts by their greatest common divisor (or Highest Common Factor). In this case, dividing 24, 12, and 18 by 6 yields the simplest integer ratio.
Key Takeaways
- When given a total and some parts, the remaining part is found by subtraction: .
- A ratio should always be expressed in its simplest whole-number form by dividing all terms by their HCF.
Common Mistakes
- Forgetting to calculate the number of trucks and using the total (54) or just one of the other numbers as the third term in the ratio.
- Simplifying the ratio incorrectly (e.g., only dividing two of the terms).
- Writing the ratio in the wrong order (e.g., Trucks : Cars : Vans instead of Cars : Vans : Trucks).
Things to Be Careful About
- Ensure you identify which quantities correspond to 'cars', 'vans', and 'trucks' before writing the ratio, as the question specifies the order "cars to vans to trucks".
Trevor decides that it is time to reduce his collection of vehicles.
He sells cars, vans and trucks.
He finds that the ratio of cars to vans to trucks is now .
Find , and , given that he has sold
- at least one of each type of vehicle
- the smallest possible number of vehicles.
= ______
= ______
= ______
Approach
Let , , and be the number of cars, vans, and trucks sold respectively. We know the initial counts: Cars = 24, Vans = 12, Trucks = 18. The remaining counts are , , and . These remaining counts must be in the ratio . We need to find integer values for such that at least one of each is sold () and the total number sold () is minimized.
Working
Initial counts:
Cars =
Vans =
Trucks =
Remaining counts after selling:
Cars =
Vans =
Trucks =
The problem states the new ratio is . This means there exists a positive multiplier such that:
From these equations, we can express in terms of :
Constraints:
-
must be positive integers (since at least one of each is sold).
Combining these, the maximum possible integer value for is . Also, since the remaining vehicles must exist, , so .
So, can be any integer from to . -
We want to minimize the total number of vehicles sold, .
To minimize , we need to maximize . The largest valid integer is .
Substitute into the expressions for :
Check validity:
- Sold: . All are . Correct.
- Remaining: Cars = , Vans = , Trucks = .
- Ratio: . Dividing by 5 gives . Correct.
- Total sold: . If we tried , total sold would be , which is larger. So gives the minimum.
Answer
c = 14, v = 2, t = 13
Walkthrough
The key to this problem is introducing a scaling factor (often called or ) to represent the units in the new ratio . Since the remaining vehicles are in the ratio , we can say the remaining cars are , remaining vans are , and remaining trucks are . We then relate these back to the original counts by subtracting the sold amounts (). This gives us three equations linking the sold amounts to .
Next, we use the constraint "at least one of each type is sold" to find the range of possible integer values for . Specifically, the number of vans sold () provides the tightest constraint because there are fewer vans initially than cars or trucks. Once we have the possible values for , we look at the expression for the total number of vehicles sold. The total sold is the original total minus the remaining total (). To sell the smallest number of vehicles, we must keep the largest number of vehicles. Therefore, we choose the largest possible valid .
Key Takeaways
- Ratios can be converted into algebraic expressions by multiplying each part by a constant .
- Constraints like "at least one sold" translate into inequalities for the variables.
- Minimizing a sum of variables related linearly to a parameter often involves maximizing or minimizing that parameter within its valid range.
Common Mistakes
- Assuming the ratio applies to the sold vehicles instead of the remaining ones.
- Failing to check that the calculated sold amounts () are positive integers.
- Choosing the smallest (e.g., ) instead of the largest, leading to the maximum rather than minimum number of vehicles sold.
- Not verifying that the resulting remaining counts actually form the ratio.
Things to Be Careful About
- Remember that must be an integer because you cannot have a fraction of a vehicle.
- Double-check the direction of the inequality when solving for from the condition . Since , increasing decreases , so there is an upper bound on .
- The question asks for specifically, not just the total sold.
The rest of this paper
11 more questions- Q2Number6M
- Q3Probability5M
- Q4[Legacy] Matrices6M
- Q5Algebra and Graphs12M
- Q6Trigonometry · Geometry10M
- Q7Algebra and Graphs9M
- Q8Algebra and Graphs · Mensuration12M
- Q9Geometry · Trigonometry12M
- Q10Geometry · Mensuration · Algebra and Graphs12M
- Q11Statistics12M
- Q12Geometry · Mensuration12M