The mole and the Avogadro constant
“
understand that amount of substance is an SI base quantity with the base unit mol; use molar quantities where one mole of any substance is the amount containing a number of particles of that substance equal to the Avogadro constant NA
Counting the uncountable
A laboratory flask of air holds roughly molecules — a 1 followed by twenty-two zeros, far beyond any everyday counting. Yet nearly every gas calculation in this topic ends with a question about those molecules: how many are there, what does each one weigh? Physics needs a bridge between the laboratory scale (grams, litres) and the molecular scale (masses of ), and the SI built one deliberately: a seventh base quantity called amount of substance, with base unit the mole (mol). Say that parallel explicitly, because it is the whole idea: amount of substance stands beside mass exactly as kilograms do — an independent base quantity, not something you derive from mass or volume.
One mole is defined as the amount of substance containing a number of particles equal to the Avogadro constant :
"Particles" means whatever the substance is actually made of — atoms for helium, molecules for oxygen and nitrogen, ions for a salt. The examiner's definition of the constant itself is worth memorising word-perfectly, because it is asked verbatim and paid as its own mark (9702/41 O/N 2024 Q3(a)(i), 9702/43 O/N 2024 Q3(a)(i)):
the number of particles per unit amount of substance (B1).
Notice the shape of that sentence: it defines as a conversion factor between a count (particles) and an amount (moles) — which is precisely the job it does in every formula below.
Amount of substance measures how many particles a sample contains, in units of moles; one mole contains particles, so converts counts into amounts and back.
Two bridges: mass → moles → molecules
Everything in §01 runs across two bridges. The first connects the molecular count to the amount :
— one line read in both directions: divide molecules by to get moles, multiply moles by it to get molecules. The second bridge connects a measured mass to an amount, through the molar mass (the mass of one mole, quoted in ):
Chain them and you can walk from "I weighed out 8.0 g" all the way to "my sample contains this many molecules". One unit discipline keeps the second bridge honest: molar masses are tabulated in grams per mole, but physics equations demand kilograms — so convert on sight. The mass of one mole in kg is the relative atomic/molecular mass : helium's becomes . Make that conversion its own line and it can never bite you.
Invented demo — bookkeeping a helium balloon
A small balloon holds of helium. Helium-4 is monatomic — its particles are single atoms — and its molar mass is . Calculate (a) the amount of helium in mol, (b) the number of helium atoms, and (c) the number of atoms in one gram of helium.
Show full working
- 1
(a) Convert the data to SI first, then cross the mass bridge:
Both masses go to kilograms before dividing — matching units cancel cleanly and the answer reads 'one mole', which is the sanity anchor for everything downstream.
- 2
(b) Cross the counting bridge:
One mole of atoms is, by definition, N_A atoms — the definition doing real work rather than sitting in a fact list.
- 3
(c) Scale down from the whole sample:
A single gram carries a hundred billion billion atoms — this is why the mole exists at all: no other counting unit survives these powers of ten.
(a) n = 4.0×10⁻³ / 4.0×10⁻³ = 1.0 mol. (b) N = 6.02×10²³ atoms. (c) 1.5×10²³ atoms per gram.
Mass → moles → molecules is the standard chain. Write each bridge as its own line — schemes pay the two steps separately, and merged working hides slips.
Answering "State what is meant by the Avogadro constant" with just "".
The number of particles per unit amount of substance (equal to 6.02×10²³ mol⁻¹).
The B1 is paid for the defining phrase, not the value. A bare number states no relationship between counts and amounts.
Treating the mole as a unit of mass ("a mole of helium weighs 6.02×10²³ g").
The mole counts amount of substance; the MASS of one mole depends on the substance (its molar mass).
One mole of helium is 4 g, one mole of oxygen is 32 g — but both contain the same number of particles. That contrast is the entire point of the unit.
Dividing a mass in grams by a molar mass in kg mol⁻¹ (or vice versa).
Match units first: grams pair with g mol⁻¹, kilograms with kg mol⁻¹ — convert one of the pair before dividing.
A stray factor of 1000 rides silently through the rest of the question. Convert molar mass to kg mol⁻¹ on sight.
Feeding (a molecule count) into , or (moles) into .
Check which letter the equation wants: lowercase n = moles, uppercase N = molecules. Preview of §02's biggest trap.
The two forms of the gas law differ only in their counting basis — mixing them is off by a factor of 6×10²³, never a near miss.
Your turn
The verbatim definition, a straight counting drill with big powers of ten, and the full mass-to-molecules chain.
- 19702/41 O/N 2024 Q3(a)(i)1 mark
State what is meant by the Avogadro constant.
Stuck? Show hint
Define it as a conversion: number of what, per unit of what?
Show solution
- 1
The number of particles per unit amount of substance (B1) — numerically .
The phrase is the mark; the value is decoration. 'Number of particles in one mole' also scores — same content, different wording.
AnswerThe number of particles per unit amount of substance (6.02×10²³ mol⁻¹).
- 1
- 21 mark
A sample of an ideal gas contains molecules. Calculate the amount of substance of the sample, in mol.
Stuck? Show hint
— watch the power of ten in the division.
Show solution
- 1
Cross the counting bridge:
Divide the front numbers, then subtract the powers: 3.4/6.02 = 0.56, and 10²²⁻²³ = 10⁻¹.
- 2
Fewer than one mole — correct, since the sample holds about a twentieth of Avogadro's number of molecules. This is the exact arithmetic the O/N 2025 paper pays an A1 for.
Answern = 3.4×10²² / 6.02×10²³ = 0.056 mol.
- 1
- 32 marks
Oxygen gas consists of diatomic molecules, , of molar mass . A vessel contains of oxygen gas. Calculate the number of oxygen molecules in the vessel.
Stuck? Show hint
Two bridges in sequence: mass → moles, then moles → molecules.
Show solution
- 1
Mass bridge first:
Grams against g mol⁻¹ pair consistently here, so no conversion is needed — but say WHY they pair rather than hoping.
- 2
Then the counting bridge:
A quarter of a mole times Avogadro's number. Note the particles here are MOLECULES — the question said diatomic, and 'atoms' would double the answer wrongly.
Answern = 8.0/32 = 0.25 mol, so N = 0.25 × 6.02×10²³ = 1.5×10²³ molecules.
- 1
The rest of this note
Can you do all of these?
Quote the Avogadro constant definition verbatim: number of particles per unit amount of substance
Decide n versus N BEFORE choosing the equation: n moles → pV = nRT; N molecules → pV = NkT — never mix R with k or vice versa
Convert BEFORE substituting: add 273 only to absolute temperatures (never to ΔT), and cm³ → m³ by ×10⁻⁶
Define an ideal gas with BOTH clauses: obeys pV ∝ T at all values of p, V and T, AND T is the thermodynamic temperature
Reproduce the kinetic-theory assumptions word-perfectly: constant random motion · perfectly elastic collisions · no forces except during collisions · negligible molecular volume · instantaneous collisions
Run the pressure chain in order: collide with wall → momentum changes → wall exerts force on molecule → molecule exerts force on wall → many molecules over the area → pressure
Rebuild the derivation on demand: Δp = 2mc → Δt = 2L/c → F = mc²/L → pV = Nmc² → replace c² by ⟨cx²⟩ = ⅓⟨c²⟩
Read ⟨c²⟩ as the mean of the SQUARES, and c_r.m.s. as its square root — r.m.s. speed is not the mean speed
On a pV-versus-kT graph: straight line through the origin ⇒ ideal gas; gradient = N
State E_K = ³⁄₂kT as depending on T alone — hydrogen and oxygen at the same T have equal molecular kinetic energies but different speeds
Use U = ³⁄₂pV as the fast internal-energy route when p and V are given
Explain U ∝ T in two clauses: no intermolecular forces ⇒ zero potential energy ⇒ internal energy is all kinetic, and KE ∝ T