Making amines: four routes
“
recall reactions (reagents and conditions) producing primary and secondary amines: (a) halogenoalkanes + NH₃ in ethanol heated under pressure (b) halogenoalkanes + primary amines in ethanol, heated in a sealed tube / under pressure (c) reduction of amides with LiAlH₄ (d) reduction of nitriles with LiAlH₄ or H₂/Ni
Four doors into the amine family
Amines are this topic's gateway group: the amides of §02, the basicity ladder of §03, the diazonium chemistry of §§05–06 and the amino acids of §§08–10 are all amines wearing extra groups. The syllabus lists exactly FOUR ways of making them, and the exam examines them as a set — a typical question prints a two-step scheme and asks you to name the intermediate or quote the reagent. The four doors split into two families, and the families answer different questions: the two substitution doors swap a halogen for a nitrogen group (carbon count unchanged), while the two reduction doors build a onto an existing nitrogen (and differ in whether a carbon is added on the way).
Both routes are the AS Halogenoalkanes note's nucleophilic substitution, now with a nitrogen nucleophile and examinable conditions.
Route (a): halogenoalkane + ammonia → primary amine. Reagents and conditions, in full: in ethanol, heated under pressure (a sealed tube — ammonia is a gas, and pressure lets the mixture be heated above its boiling point). The substitution itself:
Two things the mark scheme always checks:
- Excess . The product amine is ITSELF a nucleophile — if ammonia runs short, the product attacks more halogenoalkane and you get a soup of and amines. A large excess of ammonia makes the nucleophile that wins every collision.
- The second ammonia. is expelled in the substitution; a second mops it up as . Equations written 1:1 with lose the co-product mark.
Route (b): halogenoalkane + primary amine → secondary amine. Same mechanism, but the nitrogen nucleophile arrives already carrying an R group — so the product's nitrogen carries TWO: conditions are the primary amine in ethanol, heated in a sealed tube / under pressure:
The attacking nitrogen keeps its methyl: the product is the secondary amine , and the second amine molecule takes the away as the methylammonium salt — the same mopping-up bookkeeping as route (a).
Both reductions add four hydrogens across a multiple bond next to the nitrogen — equations write them as the symbol — and both use the strongest hydride on the course.
Route (c): amide reduction. in dry ether reduces the group of an amide to — the nitrogen and its substituents ride through untouched:
Count the carbons: the carbonyl carbon STAYS, so an amide reduction never changes the chain length. A substituted amide reduces the same way, keeping its N-substituent: — the reaction §04 returns to.
Route (d): nitrile reduction. in dry ether, or with a Ni catalyst and heat:
Here the nitrile carbon becomes the — the one door that ADDS a carbon, unlike route (c). Pair it with the AS substitution in ethanol and you have the standard two-step that takes a halogenoalkane to an amine with ONE EXTRA CARBON:
Note is too weak for BOTH reduction routes: nitriles and amides need or .
Four-route map into the amine family. Centre: the target hub R–NH₂ (primary amine), with a note that a 2° amine RNHR′ exits route 2 instead. Four numbered cards feed the hub. Route 1, substitution: RX + 2NH₃ (excess), ethanol, heat under pressure → RNH₂ + NH₄X, tagged 'carbon count unchanged'. Route 2, substitution: RX + 2R′NH₂, ethanol, sealed tube → RNHR′ + R′NH₃X, tagged 'gives the SECONDARY amine'. Route 3, reduction: RCONH₂ + LiAlH₄ (dry ether) → RCH₂NH₂, tagged 'same carbon count'. Route 4, reduction: RCN + LiAlH₄ or H₂/Ni → RCH₂NH₂, tagged '+1 carbon', with the KCN detour shown beneath it: RX + KCN in ethanol → RCN. A footer bar reads: choose the door by carbon count and by which N substituents the target carries.
route | reagents and conditions | product | carbon count |
|---|---|---|---|
(a) RX + NH₃ | NH₃ in ethanol, heated under pressure (excess NH₃) | 1° amine RNH₂ | unchanged |
(b) RX + 1° amine | R′NH₂ in ethanol, sealed tube / pressure | 2° amine RNHR′ | unchanged |
(c) amide reduction | LiAlH₄ in dry ether | 1° (or substituted) amine | unchanged (CO → CH₂) |
(d) nitrile reduction | LiAlH₄ in dry ether, OR H₂/Ni + heat | 1° amine RCH₂NH₂ | +1 (via KCN detour) |
The four doors at a glance. The carbon-count column is the fastest route-picker in a synthesis question.
- 1
Compare carbon counts: starting material vs target amine. One extra carbon in the target forces the nitrile detour ( with in ethanol, then reduce); same count rules it out.
The count is printed in the formulae — a 10-second comparison decides the entire route before any chemistry is quoted.
- 2
Check the target's nitrogen: a amine can come from routes (a), (c) or (d); a amine needs route (b) — or the reduction of a substituted amide (§02).
Route (b) is the ONLY substitution door to a secondary amine — questions exploit it as the odd one out.
- 3
Quote conditions in full: ethanol + heat under pressure for the substitutions; dry ether for ; heat for the option.
Conditions marks are separate credit lines — 'NH₃' alone scores the reagent mark and drops the conditions mark every time.
- 4
If an equation is asked for, write it with the mopping-up second equivalent () or with for the reductions.
The 2-equivalent form is the credited skeleton in this family; the [H] form is how the reductions are printed in mark schemes.
Worked demo — two plans for one amine
Devise a synthesis of propylamine, :
(a) from 1-bromopropane, ;
(b) from bromoethane, .
In each case give the reagents and conditions of every step, and write the equation for the final step of route (a).
Show full working
- 1
(a) Count carbons: , no change — the direct substitution door works: in ethanol, heated under pressure, with the ammonia in excess.
Same carbon count rules out the nitrile immediately — no KCN anywhere in this route.
- 2
(a) Equation: .
Two NH₃ in, amine plus NH₄Br out — the second ammonia's mopping-up job earns its own credit line.
- 3
(b) Count carbons: — ONE extra carbon is needed, so the nitrile detour is forced: step 1, in ethanol (substitution): .
The CN carbon JOINS the chain — this is where the extra carbon enters. Forgetting the KCN step and reducing bromoethane directly is impossible: there is no N to reduce.
- 4
(b) Step 2, reduce the nitrile: in dry ether (or , heat): .
4[H] across the C≡N gives the −CH₂NH₂ — the nitrile carbon becomes the new CH₂, completing the chain extension.
(a) excess NH₃ in ethanol, heat under pressure → CH₃CH₂CH₂NH₂ + NH₄Br · (b) KCN in ethanol, then LiAlH₄/dry ether (or H₂/Ni) → CH₃CH₂CH₂NH₂
Carbon count first, nitrogen substituents second, conditions third — the same order the marks are paid in.
Your turn
Two route-planning drills and one equation-writing set — all invented, all on the four-door map.
- 12 marks
Devise a synthesis of butan-1-amine, , starting from 1-bromopropane, . Give the reagents and conditions of each step.
Stuck? Show hint
Compare carbon counts first — the answer is forced before any chemistry is quoted.
Show solution
- 1
Count: — one extra carbon, so the nitrile detour is mandatory: in ethanol .
KCN's carbon becomes part of the chain — the substitution that ADDS a carbon rather than swapping a group.
- 2
Reduce the nitrile: in dry ether (or , heat): .
The C≡N takes 4[H] to become −CH₂NH₂; the direct route (a) would have kept three carbons — the wrong product.
AnswerKCN in ethanol → CH₃CH₂CH₂CN; then LiAlH₄ in dry ether (or H₂/Ni, heat) → CH₃CH₂CH₂CH₂NH₂
- 1
- 22 marks
(a) Write the equation for the reaction of bromoethane with an excess of ethylamine, , in ethanol in a sealed tube.
(b) Name the organic product and state its amine class.
Stuck? Show hint
The attacking nitrogen arrives carrying an ethyl group — and keeps it.
Show solution
- 1
(a) — the second amine molecule mops up the .
Same skeleton as the ammonia route: two nucleophile equivalents in, product plus ammonium salt out.
- 2
(b) The product is diethylamine — a secondary amine (its nitrogen carries two ethyl groups and one H).
Route (b) is the syllabus's only substitution door to a 2° amine: the nucleophile's own R group is what makes the product secondary.
Answer(a) C₂H₅Br + 2C₂H₅NH₂ → (C₂H₅)₂NH + C₂H₅NH₃Br · (b) diethylamine, a secondary amine
- 1
- 32 marks
Complete each reduction with reagents and conditions, and state what happens to the carbon count in each:
(a) an amine;
(b) an amine.
Stuck? Show hint
One keeps the count, one adds it — and NaBH₄ is too weak for both.
Show solution
- 1
(a) in dry ether: — propanamide to propylamine, carbon count UNCHANGED (the carbonyl C becomes the ).
Amide reduction swaps C=O for CH₂ — the carbon stays aboard, so C₃ in gives C₃ out.
- 2
(b) in dry ether OR with heat: — propanenitrile to propylamine, carbon count +1 relative to the halogenoalkane it came from (the CN carbon joins the chain).
Both routes land on the same amine here — the difference is invisible in the product and lives entirely in the count bookkeeping.
Answer(a) LiAlH₄/dry ether → CH₃CH₂CH₂NH₂ + H₂O (count unchanged) · (b) LiAlH₄ or H₂/Ni → CH₃CH₂CH₂NH₂ (nitrile route adds a C)
- 1
Writing 'NH₃ (aq)' for route (a)
NH₃ in ETHANOL, heated under pressure.
The syllabus names the solvent and the pressure — conditions marks are paid per clause, and aqueous ammonia is not the credited card.
Writing with one ammonia
(excess NH₃).
The second ammonia is both the neutralising agent and the reason the product stays a 1° amine — the equation and the 'why excess' clause are the same mark family.
Reducing a nitrile or amide with NaBH₄
LiAlH₄ in dry ether (or H₂/Ni for the nitrile).
NaBH₄ reduces aldehydes and ketones only — nitriles and amides need the stronger hydride, and the wrong reagent forfeits the whole step.
Using the nitrile detour when the carbon count is unchanged
Count first: nitrile adds one carbon; direct substitution keeps it.
The KCN step is the examiner's favourite trap in reverse — inserting it where the count says 'same' gives the next homologue, not the target.
The rest of this note
Can you do all of these?
I can write all four amine routes with their conditions (ethanol + pressure for the substitutions; dry ether for LiAlH₄) and choose between them by carbon count
I can explain why EXCESS NH₃ is used in route (a) and why a second amine/NH₃ molecule appears in every equation (mopping up HX)
I can write both acyl-chloride-to-amide equations cold, with NH₄Cl / amine salt as the paid co-product, and name N-substituted amides
I can rank amide < phenylamine < ammonia < alkylamine and give all four lone-pair clauses, link clause first
I can hydrolyse an amide with aq acid AND aq alkali, switching products correctly (acid + ammonium salt vs carboxylate + amine), and reduce one with LiAlH₄
I can take benzene to phenylamine in three stages and write the 6[H] equation, remembering the NaOH step exists because the reduction runs in acid
I can state the bromine-water observations for phenylamine (white ppt) and ethylamine (nothing) and name 2,4,6-tribromophenylamine
I can diazotise below 10 °C and warm the salt with water to phenol — reagents, temperatures and the reason for the ice
I can run the azo coupling in NaOH(aq) and spot the –N=N– group in any printed dye structure
I can draw an amino acid's cation, zwitterion and anion against pH, define the isoelectric point, and predict the dominant form at any pH
I can draw a dipeptide with a fully displayed peptide bond in the correct N-terminal-first order, and read an electrophoresis plate from charge and